Seven against the world (34 Viewers)

[Bjerknes]

You did not ban him for ten days, though, right Zlatan?

 

Buy on AliExpress.com

[Zlatan]

++ [ originally posted by Andy ] ++
You did not ban him for ten days, though, right Zlatan?

Nope.

Like I said, one or two arent enough for a ban, only if I see that the user has continued creating dual accounts after being warned.

 

[Seven]

++ [ originally posted by Zlatan ] ++



Thats not what I ment. What I ment is that he knows that dual accounts are a no no under the new management. One or two can be tolerated (altho the dual accounts will be banned), but keep on doing it and a ban will follow.

I never used Centro to fight my own battles and it's completely unfair that he was banned because certain members felt the need to act as if he had said something terrible. They only acted that way because they think I'm Centro. The Nick against the world group is laugable.

 

[JCK]

++ [ originally posted by Andy ] ++
I guess Seven logged into the wrong account.

He's done that several times :dielaugh:

 

[JCK]

++ [ originally posted by Seven ] ++


I never used Centro to fight my own battles and it's completely unfair that he was banned because certain members felt the need to act as if he had said something terrible. They only acted that way because they think I'm Centro. The Nick against the world group is laugable.

We are there to please you

 

[Zlatan]

++ [ originally posted by Seven ] ++


I never used Centro to fight my own battles and it's completely unfair that he was banned because certain members felt the need to act as if he had said something terrible. They only acted that way because they think I'm Centro. The Nick against the world group is laugable.

And you are telling me this because... ?

 

[Tom]

Was he banned solely on the basis of being a dual account, Z, or inflammatory posting?

btw, cool custom title

 

[Zlatan]

Thanks


I didnt ban him btw

 

[Tom]

oh alright fair enough. Just didn't see any reason for the banning thats all

 

[Zlatan]

I dont comment or question other mods decisions.


It's a mod thing, you wouldnt understand

 

[Tom]

I wouldn't actually. I would be quite happy to question a poor decision, which this seems to be. Come on Z you're my only hope

 

[swag]

++ [ originally posted by Zlatan ] ++
I dont comment or question other mods decisions.


It's a mod thing, you wouldnt understand

Does this mod rock or what?

Thanks for backing me up on the mod oath, Z.

 

[swag]

++ [ originally posted by Tom ] ++
Was he banned solely on the basis of being a dual account, Z, or inflammatory posting?

btw, cool custom title

As basically stated here:

http://www.juventuz.com/forum/showthread.php?threadid=4407&postid=829063#post829063

it was more of a pattern of repeated disrespect and antagonism against other forum members which, perhaps insufficient solely, was pushed over the edge by dual account shenanigans.

And Z's title most definitely fits, even if he doesn't do all (just most) of the banning around here.

 

[Seven]

FFS Swag, there was no pattern of repeated disrespect. He has been respectful to those members who were respectful to him. You'll have to ban IncuboRossonero and Andy as well if you're going to play the game like this. So I'll be here waiting for you to do so. Antagonism is acceptable, but even so he wasn't guilty of it. You're full of shit towards this issue and you're incredabily biased.

 

[swag]

But Andy has been banned for dual account shenanigans. Nick hasn't. As I said, the antagonism in itself, while a real cause for concern (as it is in your case), I did not see as sufficient. If I was truly that biased, I would have banned your behind a long time ago.

(You still forget that I actually agree with some of Centro's posting content.)

 

[Seven]

But the thing is swag, he never really disrespected anyone. Only those who attacked him in the first place. So banning him for that and something that isn't proven seems harsh.

 

[Bjerknes]

Well, I'll guess you will be waiting forever Seven, because the decision is Final.

 

[swag]

++ [ originally posted by Seven ] ++
But the thing is swag, he never really disrespected anyone. Only those who attacked him in the first place. So banning him for that and something that isn't proven seems harsh.

Combined, they presented enough of a detriment to these forums for me to take action and not sit idly by while things got more suspicious, ridiculous, and down the toilet. And if I had 100% complete evidence that they were dual accounts, you wouldn't be posting here either.

 

[swag]

++ [ originally posted by Andy ] ++
Well, I'll guess you will be waiting forever Seven, because the decision is Final.

Though let's also be clear that you and Nick are far from innocent parties here either. This is a black eye for everybody involved.

 

[Zlatan]

++ [ originally posted by Tom ] ++
I wouldn't actually. I would be quite happy to question a poor decision, which this seems to be. Come on Z you're my only hope

Sorry

++ [ originally posted by swag ] ++


Does this mod rock or what?

Thanks for backing me up on the mod oath, Z.

No problem