Serie A players ratings (3 Viewers)
- Thread starter mate
- Start date
He had an amazing season, and is ok to say he was the best serie A player, but is actually the first season he is like this. Last year 4 example the best (he even won the best player oscar) was Treze, and this season we are all blaming him.
I think in the lasts years ther's not any player who can be considered THE KING in serie A, it change season by season and it depends on many things.
Anycase, I don't see Mutu as a possible golden ball winner, but he rocks
I think in the lasts years ther's not any player who can be considered THE KING in serie A, it change season by season and it depends on many things.
Anycase, I don't see Mutu as a possible golden ball winner, but he rocks
Every week in www.gazzetta.it it was possible 4 peaple to rate the players of every match (If I remember good votes went from 3 to 9) so at the end it came out 2 different averages one from the journalists "pagelle di gazzetta" and one from the peaple "pagelle dei tifosi".
Also i found the statistics 4 the referees:
http://www.gazzetta.it/speciali/statistiche/2002/arbitri/index_arbitri.shtml
But in this case ther's no "peaple ratings" and you can see just the average not check the single rate match by match like 4 the players...
Also i found the statistics 4 the referees:
http://www.gazzetta.it/speciali/statistiche/2002/arbitri/index_arbitri.shtml
But in this case ther's no "peaple ratings" and you can see just the average not check the single rate match by match like 4 the players...
++ [ originally posted by dpforever ] ++
De Santis single-handedly led Udine to the UEFA .. Mutu is good, but there were other protagonists in the Parma team, like Frey, Adriano, and Nakata (on his day) .. Another point that made me put De Santis over Mutu, is that the GK played greatly even against the big teams (gave Inter, Juve, and Milan a hard time) .. whereas Mutu supposedly shone only against small-middle teams .. Mutu also scored many of his goals from penalties and free-kicks .. but I still rate him highly .. I mean 3rd best isn't that bad at all
De Santis single-handedly led Udine to the UEFA .. Mutu is good, but there were other protagonists in the Parma team, like Frey, Adriano, and Nakata (on his day) .. Another point that made me put De Santis over Mutu, is that the GK played greatly even against the big teams (gave Inter, Juve, and Milan a hard time) .. whereas Mutu supposedly shone only against small-middle teams .. Mutu also scored many of his goals from penalties and free-kicks .. but I still rate him highly .. I mean 3rd best isn't that bad at all
Pizarro, Jankulovski, Jorgensen and Muzzi all played an important role too. Even Spalletti really did an excellent job, from taking a team that saved itself from relegation last season, to a team competiting for europe.I think Nakata has been quite disappointing this season, most probably cos he was being played out of position (on the right wing whereas he's more of a central midfielder that can dictate the game).
Mutu only had 4 penalties against Del Piero's 7, so therefore Mutu scores more from open play and freekicks than DP does. There was a time when DP used to score loads of goals from freekicks, but nowadays sadly enough he lost his touch. On the other hand Mutu is quite lethal from those spot kicks.
I do not think Mutu is that hard to obtain. Lippi is a keen admirer of his, and I believe that he is a possible target.