[Serie A] Lazio 1-1 Juventus [10th May, 2025 18:00 CEST] (111 Viewers)
- Thread starter icemaη
- Start date
If Kalulu's red was correct, I did not see any major incident that could help Lazio. VAR called offside instead of penalty for Lazio, no arm called on Thuram which were correct decisions. Once again we have ourselves to blame.
- - - Updated - - -
I did not expect us to beat Lazio or Bologna. Im surprised we did not lose considering how terrible this side is and that probably our most creative player did not play. We can still qualify but Atalanta has to beat Roma.
- - - Updated - - -
I did not expect us to beat Lazio or Bologna. Im surprised we did not lose considering how terrible this side is and that probably our most creative player did not play. We can still qualify but Atalanta has to beat Roma.
I mainly agree.
But the ref was so inconsistent with yellows to our disadvantage. Lazio players should have been booked in the first half in early in the second. A pattern seemed to be their player would foul us on the break, the ref would play minimal advantage and the Lazio player avoided a booking. When reversed, the ref stopped the game and booked our player. Having so many players on yellows hampered us.
I also think their no. 10 looked offside on the equaliser and was interfering with play, but not seen the replay.
But the ref was so inconsistent with yellows to our disadvantage. Lazio players should have been booked in the first half in early in the second. A pattern seemed to be their player would foul us on the break, the ref would play minimal advantage and the Lazio player avoided a booking. When reversed, the ref stopped the game and booked our player. Having so many players on yellows hampered us.
I also think their no. 10 looked offside on the equaliser and was interfering with play, but not seen the replay.
this was posted right after the red. i'll add one other thing too: two yellows were given to players at risk of suspension. both of those yellows were harsh. oh, and an other one: kalulu is the first player to get a red based on a doorbell camera footage mounted on a satellite
and of course we have alen protecting the ref
you should have sat this one out @Alen
and of course we have alen protecting the ref
you should have sat this one out @Alen
what can we do? we can not fight against it...even if expose them on media it wont make a difference, this shit is rooted inside of this mafia country and it will always be the same...we will argue here forever how this system is against us. We will have to put 20% more than opponents every match and thats all we can do.
So going by your logic, after Kalulu's red the ref became anti-Lazio because he gave them 5 yellows for 3 fouls and he gave us only 1 for 4 fouls? Don't be selective with the facts, you're not Danielsz and you're much better than that.
It's perfectly fine to be subjective in a football forum and about your favorite team. But it's not a sin or a crime to try and be objective.
Like I said, if Kalulu's red was fine, the ref was fine. If it was wrong, then the ref fucked up everything, he decided the match, maybe even next season, and he should get a lengthy ban. But the 7 minutes added time, not giving a yellow for Lazio's fouls in the first half when it's debatable if any of those warranted a yellow, for calling De Gregorio's foul a penalty and so on, don't make this a bad ref performance. It's only about the red card call.
It's perfectly fine to be subjective in a football forum and about your favorite team. But it's not a sin or a crime to try and be objective.
Like I said, if Kalulu's red was fine, the ref was fine. If it was wrong, then the ref fucked up everything, he decided the match, maybe even next season, and he should get a lengthy ban. But the 7 minutes added time, not giving a yellow for Lazio's fouls in the first half when it's debatable if any of those warranted a yellow, for calling De Gregorio's foul a penalty and so on, don't make this a bad ref performance. It's only about the red card call.
