I am sorry but that is pure horseshit.
How can you possibly give him a lower mark than Zebina in the same game?
Then you say Dp did not see much of the ball, if you look at my play by play, Dp was almost always on the ball in the 2nd half when he came on.
Marchionni was not quite when he came on he was invisible, for the first 20 mins of his coming on, he never touched the ball.
I am not so sure I understand what goes on in this forum, Molinaro, Criscito, Nocerino are young Italian players but they always seem to get a lot of stick on here.
Chiellini all of a sudden can do no wrong on here.
Molinaro, I do believe is making his first foray in serieA whilst Tiago and Almiron are more experienced but when they have all been given chances to shine Molinaro has obviously performed better that those 2 but he gets mollified.
Then you can go back to criticising him when he plays crap and it might be better if we all stopped looking at ppls fuckups so we can write about it and ignore the good things they do in games
i gave zebina a higher mark because zebina played better offensively and defensively, believe it or not.
dp was not on the ball that much, maybe you seem to think so because you enjoyed his fancy flicks and whatever else, but if we hadn't played so much long balls and actually played it to his feet, we might not have suffered so much.
marchionni was quiet, he DID touch the ball a few times and did shit, but he just came back from a couple long-term injuries.
players get stick when they do shit, get over it! and nocerino normally does play well, and normally gets praise for it.
chiellini, along with trez and gigi has been one of our best players this season, consistently. why would he be criticised?

molinaro was in serie a last year with siena. he gets "molified" but almiron and tiago get it a lot worse, a lot.:rndh:
good perforances get praise, shitty performances get criticism. is this a new concept?
what is it with you and molinaro?