[Serie A] JUVENTUS 4-0 Lecce [June 26th, 2020] (1 Viewer)

vote


  • Total voters
    31
  • Poll closed .

Osman

Koul Khara!
Aug 30, 2002
52,238
#21
Everything has been screaming three man backline since the beginning of the season and now we are short on full backs but we know what will happen.
The same issue would be there for 3 back line (even if other cbs were healthy, which they arent), who would play left wing back?
 

Gigiventus

Senior Member
Mar 3, 2017
1,420
#25
Its Lecce, play the U23 leftback, Beruatto or whoever it is. Might as well give a kid a chance against in a home game against a relegation contender.

Szczesny; kidLB, De Ligt, Bonucci, Cuadrado; Rabiot, Bentancur, Ramsey; Ronaldo, Dybala, Bernardeschi

Sub in Matuidi, Pjanic, Costa, and soneone from the bench to give cuadrado a rest
 
OP
OP
Hustini

Hustini

Senior Member
Hustini
May 29, 2005
87,270
#26
Haha i am a big fan of 4-4-2 diamond, but i think ramsey showed that he can't play the trequartista and prefers CM. Beside that i believe it would be not a good idea to change the system again. Let's stick to 4-3-3 and win the CL
Switch him and Pjanic then. Try Pjanic right behind the offense.
 
Jun 7, 2003
2,415
#27
Switch him and Pjanic then. Try Pjanic right behind the offense.
Allegri tried Pjanic behind the offense, but the system was 4-2-3-1. Maybe we should give your idea a try, alltough it is unlikely because Ronaldo wants to play on the Left in 4-3-3. That's what he told Sarri after Napoli, read it somewhere don't know if true.
 
OP
OP
Hustini

Hustini

Senior Member
Hustini
May 29, 2005
87,270
#28
Allegri tried Pjanic behind the offense, but the system was 4-2-3-1. Maybe we should give your idea a try, alltough it is unlikely because Ronaldo wants to play on the Left in 4-3-3. That's what he told Sarri after Napoli, read it somewhere don't know if true.
well pjanic can't be any worse there than he is in front of defense
 
OP
OP
Hustini

Hustini

Senior Member
Hustini
May 29, 2005
87,270
#30
At the beginning of the season he had some good games.
But yeah you are right, i don't think that in front of the defense is his best position and behind the offense is worth a try
well, his slow pace in front of defense causes him to get a lot of yellow cards and he can't recover quickly enough to mop stuff up like Bentancur can. His passing on paper is better than our other midfielders so it would be nice to see if he can start giving our offense better service if he is kept closer to them
 

pavluska

Senior Member
Apr 25, 2013
5,511
#34
Looking at games ahead, this would have been perfect opportunity to rest Bonucci for Rugani but can't now with another big change in defense in Matuidi

Tek
Cuadra deLight Bonucci Matuidi
Ramsey Ben10 Rabiot
Berna Dybala Ronaldo

Try U23 or U20 LB as sub and sub Dybala out for DC.
 

JCK

Biased
May 11, 2004
113,639
#35
The same issue would be there for 3 back line (even if other cbs were healthy, which they arent), who would play left wing back?
I will field an asymmetric formation with Cuadrado on the right. Matuidi on the left but Blaise restricted to stay as CM and allow CR7 more freedom. Ramsey is essential in this 3-5-2
 

Osman

Koul Khara!
Aug 30, 2002
52,238
#36
I will field an asymmetric formation with Cuadrado on the right. Matuidi on the left but Blaise restricted to stay as CM and allow CR7 more freedom. Ramsey is essential in this 3-5-2

What makes this better then just playing Matuidi as LB, which he is as equally comfortable with as LWB? (him being inverted CM dont work, someone need to stay wide). Also, why do you want 3-5-2 in this sitaution? What makes it better? And dont say because Sarri dont like it :D Because in this scenario, only thing a 3-5-2 do is benching Bernadeschi or Costa for Rugani (since Cuadrado would play right wingback), with no CB on the bench to come in for anyone. Which to me sounds like a terrible idea.
 

JCK

Biased
May 11, 2004
113,639
#37
What makes this better then just playing Matuidi as LB, which he is as equally comfortable with as LWB? (him being inverted CM dont work, someone need to stay wide). Also, why do you want 3-5-2 in this sitaution? What makes it better? And dont say because Sarri dont like it :D Because in this scenario, only thing a 3-5-2 do is benching Bernadeschi or Costa for Rugani (since Cuadrado would play right wingback), with no CB on the bench to come in for anyone. Which to me sounds like a terrible idea.
Because we don't have full backs and most of the leakage in defence we had was from the sides. We will now rely on two players not playing in their natural position to cover our weakest positions.
 

Osman

Koul Khara!
Aug 30, 2002
52,238
#40
Because we don't have full backs and most of the leakage in defence we had was from the sides. We will now rely on two players not playing in their natural position to cover our weakest positions.

And your solution to stopping leakage is starting Rugani????


Cuadrado is doing fine as RB, and one can fault Matuidi for anything he does around attacking box, but he doesnt let anything by him defensively.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)