[Serie A] JUVENTUS 3-0 Roma (Jan. 5th 2014) (47 Viewers)

OP

Mark

The Informer
Administrator
Dec 19, 2003
96,204
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread Starter #589
    it even helped by building our own stadium according to him. :crazy:
     

    Linebreak

    Senior Member
    Sep 18, 2009
    16,021
    I'd give Buffon MOM - his early save was superb and he was ever alert throughout the entire match. One goal for Roma at any stage could've completely changed it and superman didn't allow it.
     

    Lion

    King of Tuz
    Jan 24, 2007
    31,934
    how did de sanctis even let the first goal in.

    no way should vidal have been able to score from that angle. any decent keeper would have blocked that shot.

    it shows what a cack goalie de sanctis really is.
     

    Ali

    Conditioned
    Contributor
    Jul 15, 2002
    19,311
    It hits his elbow, but there is no way that is a penalty... It's just to random, and his arm was not far from his body or by any means in an unatural position, and he did not on purpose move his arm towards the ball... There was contact between arm and ball, but that does not mean there is a penalty... No reason to be blind just because we are biased
    His hand was trailing. He was watching the ball & realised he was in front of it. He folded his hand & blocked the ball with his elbow. I would not blame a ref for giving it. If it was the other way round all would be screaming that we bought the ref.
     

    Linebreak

    Senior Member
    Sep 18, 2009
    16,021
    how did de sanctis even let the first goal in.

    no way should vidal have been able to score from that angle. any decent keeper would have blocked that shot.

    it shows what a cack goalie de sanctis really is.
    Vidal was extremely close to goal and anyone would think it more likely that he'd go across goal rather than near post. It was an intelligent shot by Vidal that fooled the keeper - Can't really blame De Sanctis as Vidal was a few yards away from goal.
     

    Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 47)