Serie A 2023-24 (39 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Ronn

Mes Que Un Club
May 3, 2012
20,867

s4tch

Senior Member
Mar 23, 2015
33,583
Thank you, but this ain't it. It refers to 'L’indicatore di Liquidità" which should be at least 0.5, "L'indicatore di Indebitamento" which should be less than 1.2, and "L’indicatore di Costo del Lavoro Allargato" which should be less than 0.8. how these indicators are calculated is apparently referenced somewhere else.
those are standard financial ratios, if one ever participated in any financial course, they should know how to calculate them based on the financial report (balance sheet for the first two, income statement for the 3rd one)

so yes, these are the criteria. as for the ratios, feel free to investigate whether figc publishes them somewhere
 

Ronn

Mes Que Un Club
May 3, 2012
20,867
those are standard financial ratios, if one ever participated in any financial course, they should know how to calculate them based on the financial report (balance sheet for the first two, income statement for the 3rd one)

so yes, these are the criteria. as for the ratios, feel free to investigate whether figc publishes them somewhere
Thank you for the permission.
 

Ronn

Mes Que Un Club
May 3, 2012
20,867
you're welcome for the rules you asked for and you were too lazy to find yourself. won't happen again
I don't speak Italian and when I asked that question the answer I was looking for was a far simpler one. I'm not going to learn another language to fact check random twitteratti obviously.
None of this is your problem of course, but a simple "I don't know" answer would've been more appropriate. You obviously don't know beyond doubt whether Inda violated FIGC rules but your are willing to accept what that Twitter user said. I always aspire to have higher standards regarding what I read in social media.
 

s4tch

Senior Member
Mar 23, 2015
33,583
...You obviously don't know beyond doubt whether Inda violated FIGC rules but your are willing to accept what that Twitter user said. I always aspire to have higher standards regarding what I read in social media.
problem is that i never said that inda violated any rule. i said i didn't know how figc could let inda start the season as this is a company that's been having a negative shareholders' equity for years and is drowning in debt. financial rules were established to prevent that. inda most probably (i don't know, i assume) didn't violate any rule, because figc changed the rules post covid. they changed it after the lockdown when clubs found paying wages and inda was about to violate it, and they changed them again for the next seasons so that clubs (probably not just inda, i don't know) could participate.

see, this is your game and that's why i'm reluctant to talk to you lately: you assume stuff, you judge, then you ask your questions accordingly

one other small remark: the twitter user i quoted never said anything about the rules either. he quoted some relevant numbers from the financial report inda recently released and added what gds commented on inda's financial report. again, i said that i didn't know how figc could let inda start the season, and it was an opinion, not a fact. so an other thing you just assumed and it turned out you were completely wrong about it. it's all right, it's just a bit funny especially with your moral high horse on your standards (or i'm wrong, and your extremely high standards only apply to social media, and you don't consider tuz a social media)
 

juve123

Senior Member
Aug 10, 2017
16,638
For the Consob, the financial statement as of June 30th does not comply with accounting principles. In the evening, Juventus issued a statement: "We do not agree with the assessment, we believe we have acted in accordance with the law." The findings of the Consob are based on interpretations of suggestive elements and the application of accounting rules, judgements and assessments.

[@sportface2016)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 36)