if we get a very creative one, then matri would be better since he's a better finisher.
however, if we get a grinder that doesnt offer much creativity, vucinic would be better since he can create for himself, drop deep, and score aswel
if we get a very creative one, then matri would be better since he's a better finisher.
however, if we get a grinder that doesnt offer much creativity, vucinic would be better since he can create for himself, drop deep, and score aswel
Well yeah I agree, and I agree in general wanting BETTER player then Vuci for sure, but its kinda getting ridicolous how he is underrated here. He is better then both Matri and Quag. But the later two having a good half seasons each with Juve somehow changed peoples opinion to the other spectrum bit drastically. Can gurantee you no one would said last summer they think Quag or Matri is better (most didnt even know of Matri prolly).
Matri and Vucinic are different types of players. Matri is more of the pure finishing CF type that we wanted and looked to find in Dzeko. Matri in theory would work better with Aguero than Vucinic IMO but like its been said, we need creative wingers as well.