Russian Thread (13 Viewers)

ZoSo

Senior Member
Jul 11, 2011
41,656
Juventino[RUS];3748599 said:
So what? He can go through the swapm? :lol: and? :lol:
Show a video of T-90 doing that.

Juventino[RUS];3748601 said:


yep, they like to take a shower ;)


And abrams WAS NOT tested in Syberia but T-90 WAS so who knows how abrams will act when it there will be a lot of snow on the battlefield and temperature will be around -30C




Most likely it would be fine.


Nah man, shit can't fly, shit can't swim. It's shit.
shhhh
 

X Æ A-12

Senior Member
Contributor
Sep 4, 2006
87,979
Yes, how does a video of the tank driving around prove anything?


If you fire a RPG at an Abrams it leaves a scratch.

---------- Post added 09.07.2012 at 02:46 ----------



I meant it's most likely more common in use in forces today. And a M4 would probably be more likely to hit it's target than an AK.

---------- Post added 09.07.2012 at 02:47 ----------



http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=d82_1325841377
Depends what you mean. On single shot, held properly, an AK is far more accurate on the first shot. The M4 has less recoil and less space between moving parts so on automatic you would get a smaller spread but, having used both, I consider the AK much more accurate for practical purposes at least.
 
OP
Juventino[RUS]

Juventino[RUS]

Senior Member
Mar 9, 2006
29,039
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread Starter #1,546
    OP
    Juventino[RUS]

    Juventino[RUS]

    Senior Member
    Mar 9, 2006
    29,039
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread Starter #1,548
    OH to destroy iraqian 30 years old cars it's so hard :lol:


    Swamp you say......



    Check our armored troop-carrier destroying Mercedes S Class W140 :lol:


    And tank on ur pictures goes on the ROAD, not on the snow :lol:
     

    ZoSo

    Senior Member
    Jul 11, 2011
    41,656
    Juventino[RUS];3748621 said:
    http://smotri.com/video/view/?id=v2000513d855

    in the middle of the video, 1000 time bigger swamp

    Plus t-90 have anti-rocket system that move away rockets from tank, abrams what? :lol: And ur pictures were takin' when? In 1970s? its 21st century today
    dude that's not bigger.

    yep sure mr. propaganda.

    has the T-90 even been against another tank? Abrams has been proven in combat.
     
    OP
    Juventino[RUS]

    Juventino[RUS]

    Senior Member
    Mar 9, 2006
    29,039
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread Starter #1,550
    dude that's not bigger.

    yep sure mr. propaganda.

    has the T-90 even been against another tank? Abrams has been proven in combat.
    Against what? Against Old Iraq's tanks and technique that USSR brought to them in 1960-80s of previous century? :lol: Oh, yes, good job :lol:


    Russian offroad technique is the best ever

    Even americans were shocked, what more can i say
     

    ZoSo

    Senior Member
    Jul 11, 2011
    41,656
    Russia hasn't moved on much since then, they've been broke since the 90s. Only now are they starting to upgrade the military again. T-90 is built be to good in large numbers and Abrams is better overall as an individual tank.
     
    OP
    Juventino[RUS]

    Juventino[RUS]

    Senior Member
    Mar 9, 2006
    29,039
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread Starter #1,552
    Russia hasn't moved on much since then, they've been broke since the 90s. Only now are they starting to upgrade the military again. T-90 is built be to good in large numbers and Abrams is better overall as an individual tank.
    :sergio: T-90 Best tank,


    Russian Rocket system "GRAD"

    americans have better warships, that's true, but who cares about them
     

    ZoSo

    Senior Member
    Jul 11, 2011
    41,656
    Juventino[RUS];3748654 said:
    :sergio: T-90 Best tank,


    Russian Rocket system "GRAD"

    americans have better warships, that's true, but who cares about them
    Nazi WW2 rocket system


    Who cares about them??? Ships are much more important than tanks. Tanks are not even that important anymore. They are an easy target for planes and helicopters.
     
    OP
    Juventino[RUS]

    Juventino[RUS]

    Senior Member
    Mar 9, 2006
    29,039
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread Starter #1,554
    Nazi WW2 rocket system


    Who cares about them??? Ships are much more important than tanks. Tanks are not even that important anymore. They are an easy target for planes and helicopters.
    You can't come close to russia with ur ships :sergio: Our atomic submarines + rocket systems will destroy them all easily
     

    ZoSo

    Senior Member
    Jul 11, 2011
    41,656
    :sergio: are they supposed to film that? follow the missile with a plane??

    ---------- Post added 09.07.2012 at 03:41 ----------

    actually nvm, here is a video of a test

     

    Nzoric

    Grazie Mirko
    Jan 16, 2011
    37,877
    You two are getting fucking annoying. I have no problem with you flirting over the internet, but stop looking like fools. All this military BS is irrelevant, if Russia or the NATO pact are drawn into a conflict where their weapons will be pointed at each other and not through a third party cold war, it's all over. Regardless of how many tanks, how impressive a navy. Flip of a button and we're all blown to smithereens, now go fuck already.
     

    Bisco

    Senior Member
    Nov 21, 2005
    14,420
    You two are getting fucking annoying. I have no problem with you flirting over the internet, but stop looking like fools. All this military BS is irrelevant, if Russia or the NATO pact are drawn into a conflict where their weapons will be pointed at each other and not through a third party cold war, it's all over. Regardless of how many tanks, how impressive a navy. Flip of a button and we're all blown to smithereens, now go fuck already.
    :heart: nicely put for some reason conversations in this thread start out well and awesome but soon become a dick measuring contest :D guys lay it off honestly and discuss things to do with cultures you would be surprised to learn a thing or two to add to yr knowledge.
     

    Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 12)