Russia - Ukraine Conflict 2022 (56 Viewers)

s4tch

Senior Member
Mar 23, 2015
33,933
russians are using some misters weapons even true experts can't identify:


this little missile is allegedly supposed to mess up with the air defense systems.
 

Nzoric

Grazie Mirko
Jan 16, 2011
37,877
Nato bad, ethnic cleansings good, serbs great. Even if you look at core of Yugoslavian wars - regions wanted to live free, give them autonomy status, let them be, have a dialogue with everyone, but no, lets move our troops there, kill everyone who doesn't want to live under our reign and that's it, but deluded serbs will deny everything and then cry about nato bombings.

- - - Updated - - -

:rofl: Welcome to 1984
:lol:


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

Nzoric

Grazie Mirko
Jan 16, 2011
37,877
Then the Serbs and Macedonians and other west-hating USSR apologists would be ranting and raving to this day about the tyrannical west. Lol
I dont get the joke. It wouldve been good had the US invaded Russia in 1993? :confused:

Russia would have been better off had it been reformed by the US?

Lancelot and the other pro Russkies certainly sound crazy, but you guys are reaching news lows by the minute too lol.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

Post Ironic

Senior Member
Feb 9, 2013
42,253
I dont get the joke. It wouldve been good had the US invaded Russia in 1993? :confused:

Russia would have been better off had it been reformed by the US?

Lancelot and the other pro Russkies certainly sound crazy, but you guys are reaching news lows by the minute too lol.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Invaded? Lol

You been on an all-time low since you first posted in this thread. Embarrassing.
 
Mar 9, 2006
29,039
I dont get the joke. It wouldve been good had the US invaded Russia in 1993? :confused:

Russia would have been better off had it been reformed by the US?

Lancelot and the other pro Russkies certainly sound crazy, but you guys are reaching news lows by the minute too lol.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
1) Invade? For what? There were no country at all
2) Of course, Marshall plan for post soviet russia
3) upload that photo where you lick the pole
 

Post Ironic

Senior Member
Feb 9, 2013
42,253
Honestly I dont get the joke.

And pot calling the kettle black. I had much higher hopes for you than what Ive seen here. Just look at your response to my question :lol:


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Nah, you’re just another useful idiot for Kremlin propaganda. Ever since you entered the discussion going full retard with your nato/us is to blame for this war because you’re still so butthurt over 1999 and Kosovo.

And yes, Russia would be far better off today if the West/US had used sanctions and other tools to force democratic reforms in the ‘90s in exchange for allowing them to participate in the global market. Obviously.
 

Nzoric

Grazie Mirko
Jan 16, 2011
37,877
dude, are you serious?

also, aren't you a serbian living in denmark by accident? may i ask you why you live in the rotting west, and didn't pick russia, belarus or kazakhstan? your wife would be delighted lol

nzoric pls
Isnt it a legitimate question?

And I dont understand your second point either - Ive lived in Denmark for 29/30 years of my life and I love everything about it except for our contributions to invasions, bombings and meddling in other countries affairs.

And whats that about my wife?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

Nzoric

Grazie Mirko
Jan 16, 2011
37,877
Nah, you’re just another useful idiot for Kremlin propaganda. Ever since you entered the discussion going full retard with your nato/us is to blame for this war because you’re still so butthurt over 1999 and Kosovo.

And yes, Russia would be far better off today if the West/US had used sanctions and other tools to force democratic reforms in the ‘90s in exchange for allowing them to participate in the global market. Obviously.
Of course the US played a part in escalating this - that much is obvious to everyone. Doesnt make Russia less of an aggressor, but if we’re talking realpolitik its indeniable that US brinksmanship played a part in the runup to the Russian invasion. Does it make it right? No. Do I hope the Russians win? No.

On exyu I wont even bother.

On the ludicrious notion that the US would have helped Russia with reforms after the collapse of the soviet union there is nothing much to say.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

Elvin

Senior Member
Nov 25, 2005
36,923
Of course the US played a part in escalating this - that much is obvious to everyone. Doesnt make Russia less of an aggressor, but if we’re talking realpolitik its indeniable that US brinksmanship played a part in the runup to the Russian invasion. Does it make it right? No. Do I hope the Russians win? No.

On exyu I wont even bother.

On the ludicrious notion that the US would have helped Russia with reforms after the collapse of the soviet union there is nothing much to say.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Why? It helped Europe, Japan, S. Korea.
Why wouldn't it help Russia too?
 

Nzoric

Grazie Mirko
Jan 16, 2011
37,877
Why? It helped Europe, Japan, S. Korea.
Why wouldn't it help Russia too?
Thats the Marshall plan for rebuilding Europe post WW2. They did help Korea, though. That much has to be said.

Thats about it though - the opposite has predominantly been the outcome for countries reformed by the US. Thats why I found the notion funny lol.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 37)