Van persie has much more expirience in europe and domestically, has shown to be able to lead a lesser quality (wich arsenal is after all the sales), grabbing a very nice 30 goal topscorer award in the end, and thats not done by countering the opponent but trying to play football.
He is likely the cheapest in therms of transfer fee of the 3
Currently he is the best of the 3, has the highest chance of getting us far the comming 2 seasons, and has the best commercial options
this offsets an age of 29 and high wages.
I am not saying he is the best option, but i'm only saying, that he would be equally good for us then the other 3.
personally i prefer Higuain but think his fee will be impossible to meet. I would gladly take cavani ahead of van persie because of lower age, alot lower wages, offset against less impact the first 2 years then rvp could
agreed, but i think we arent gonna like the fee that comes for higuain
He is likely the cheapest in therms of transfer fee of the 3
Currently he is the best of the 3, has the highest chance of getting us far the comming 2 seasons, and has the best commercial options
this offsets an age of 29 and high wages.
I am not saying he is the best option, but i'm only saying, that he would be equally good for us then the other 3.
personally i prefer Higuain but think his fee will be impossible to meet. I would gladly take cavani ahead of van persie because of lower age, alot lower wages, offset against less impact the first 2 years then rvp could
agreed, but i think we arent gonna like the fee that comes for higuain
Exactly, he's 29 and if he played out his contract here he'd cost us 90 million € with transfer fee, wages and taxes.
