Roberto Pereyra - Midfielder - Udinese (34 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.

mondo1

Senior Member
May 14, 2006
11,468
Pereyra is a good deal, unless you look to peasant eyes.


Its a squat player, the can cover the central midfield and both wings, and we only have to pay for him next year, when we'll have much more budged then this summer


But there are people offcourse who believe we could have signed Sanchez instead, and bitch and moan about everything
Yet our bench has no impact at all.... We've signed padoin pelusos and Co just to sign pereyras and Co to replace them as they all have been pretty much useless...i dont care how much positions a player can Cover when he sucks at most of them.
 

Buy on AliExpress.com

JCK

Biased
JCK
May 11, 2004
125,395
Yet our bench has no impact at all.... We've signed padoin pelusos and Co just to sign pereyras and Co to replace them as they all have been pretty much useless...i dont care how much positions a player can Cover when he sucks at most of them.
:tup:
 

mukumsplau

Senior Member
Jul 9, 2008
4,443
spending exorbitantly on one player + his wages means not being able to cover other areas sufficiently (weather these players are starters or rotation players - good rotation players)...oftentimes last season we needed players that can come in where some impact was needed...i dont care of ppls need for that messiah striker..that aint comin close to equipping ourselves properly to face the season

u want a big name? here's 30mil(obscenely minimum)
u want two? another 30mil(obscenely minimum)

so 60mil +lets say 20mil gross for the two 'big time' players

we aint speding 60mil on two players in one transfer market when technical requirements call for proper reinforcement in other areas...

i am good with whatever we are building because i am sure we are utilising monies the best way possible

process engineering is my vocation so i cannot not think of things optimally...yes u want to spend for the very best but compromise has to be made especially after considering the advantages of one scenario over another...would it be that great?

how mch better would we be with sanchez + same old cast rather than a team reinforced properly in multiple areas

we need fucking depth..reinforced in all areas

those against spend money on makeup for their gf face yet her pum pum stink and panty dutty...pussy givin dick gangreen but they dont mind tho...face nice to look at
 

j0ker

Capo di tutti capi
Jan 5, 2006
22,892
Yet our bench has no impact at all.... We've signed padoin pelusos and Co just to sign pereyras and Co to replace them as they all have been pretty much useless...i dont care how much positions a player can Cover when he sucks at most of them.
Have you seen him play?

Tell us more about him.
 

mukumsplau

Senior Member
Jul 9, 2008
4,443
Yet our bench has no impact at all.... We've signed padoin pelusos and Co just to sign pereyras and Co to replace them as they all have been pretty much useless...i dont care how much positions a player can Cover when he sucks at most of them.
u say sucks with so much authority as if u see him play on a regular

u dont so it invalidates ur argument. wheel and come again
 

Jem83

maitre'd at Canal Bar
Nov 7, 2005
22,870
Because Pogba and Vidal are dying to sit on the bench.

Do you even know you have written?
He means that if you sign a top player, it pushes someone else to the bench, thus creating depth.

His point is valid. His problem is just that he can't see that we can't afford certain players right now :D
 

Maddy

Oracle of Copenhagen
Jul 10, 2009
16,545
Because Pogba and Vidal are dying to sit on the bench.

Do you even know you have written?
Pardon? Make sense please.

- - - Updated - - -

He means that if you sign a top player, it pushes someone else to the bench, thus creating depth.

His point is valid. His problem is just that he can't see that we can't afford certain players right now :D
Glad you ain't as thick as the other guy. I'm aware we aren't flooded with cash. Tho not convinced that we can't sign better players than we do.
 

mondo1

Senior Member
May 14, 2006
11,468
Have you seen him play?

Tell us more about him.
u say sucks with so much authority as if u see him play on a regular

u dont so it invalidates ur argument. wheel and come again
Who told u i haven't watched him? Maybe i shouldn't have used the term sucked, but it wasn't only on pereyra, i meant it more generally. In my view our bench hardly makes an impact. Yet i hear every Summer the same excuses "could cover several roles" " is just a bench Option" etc... And a year on we need to replace those players cause they had no impact, plus wie can't get rid of them.
 

j0ker

Capo di tutti capi
Jan 5, 2006
22,892
He means that if you sign a top player, it pushes someone else to the bench, thus creating depth.

His point is valid. His problem is just that he can't see that we can't afford certain players right now :D
I get his point, but we are talking about a player that mostly plays as a CM, do we need players better than Pogba and Vidal for that position?

No, we don't and that's why we are after a sub / rotation player.
 

mukumsplau

Senior Member
Jul 9, 2008
4,443
He means that if you sign a top player, it pushes someone else to the bench, thus creating depth.

His point is valid. His problem is just that he can't see that we can't afford certain players right now :D
there are players in our lineup that can be pushed to the bench...namely in defense

midfield not so sure..maybe pirlo due to age and his allegri allergy

forward..i want llorente and tevez to continue to do well

fullbacks yes...wingers yes

but like u said...we gots no money
 

Maddy

Oracle of Copenhagen
Jul 10, 2009
16,545
I get his point, but we are talking about a player that mostly plays as a CM, do we need players better than Pogba and Vidal for that position?

No, we don't and that's why we are after a sub / rotation player.
It was clearly a general statement. One could argue that in this situation (depending on the formation of Allegri) using transfer funds on a midfielder might be overkill seeing we got Pirlo, Pogba, Vidal, Marchisio, Asamoah + all the deadwood. Instead we should use the few euros we got on a player that'll strengthen the starting lineup.
 

j0ker

Capo di tutti capi
Jan 5, 2006
22,892
It was clearly a general statement. One could argue that in this situation (depending on the formation of Allegri) using transfer funds on a midfielder might be overkill seeing we got Pirlo, Pogba, Vidal, Marchisio, Asamoah + all the deadwood. Instead we should use the few euros we got on a player that'll strengthen the starting lineup.
I agree about the last part, but I still belive we will do that, but hopefully with Isco, Shaqiri and co and not with the likes of Candreva.
 

Xperd

Allegrophobic Infidel
Jun 1, 2012
35,150
It was clearly a general statement. One could argue that in this situation (depending on the formation of Allegri) using transfer funds on a midfielder might be overkill seeing we got Pirlo, Pogba, Vidal, Marchisio, Asamoah + all the deadwood. Instead we should use the few euros we got on a player that'll strengthen the starting lineup.
Just wait until we 'splash' 25m on Candreva.All dem experds will be silenced totally.We cant afford 20m+ signings bla bla bla.
 

mukumsplau

Senior Member
Jul 9, 2008
4,443
Who told u i haven't watched him? Maybe i shouldn't have used the term sucked, but it wasn't only on pereyra, i meant it more generally. In my view our bench hardly makes an impact. Yet i hear every Summer the same excuses "could cover several roles" " is just a bench Option" etc... And a year on we need to replace those players cause they had no impact, plus wie can't get rid of them.
ive seen pereyra play quite alot as i followed udinese wen they play our rivals...always thought to myself this is a player we could definitely use off the bench or rotation..certainly not duds like pepe/padoin/marrone...was happy that we were linked with him and he could very well surprise us given the quality of players that would be around him...i think another way u can purchase a starter is when ur comfortably with the quality of your backup/rotational players..so if during the season lets say for example pereyra at CM is bossing, only then the board might be more inclined to accept a deal for a starter like vidal to splurge on a top quality player for that position or maybe elsewhere if pereyra is so convinving...just a thought...just my 2cents
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 34)