That doesn't make any sense. Are you comparing Lech Poznan to Porto?
i'm comparing wolfsburg diego, that later went to juve, and back to germany.
Diego was very good for wolfsburg, failed at juventus cause in his position we looked for other characteristics, and when he returned to germany, he never got close to his first peak, thus becomming a one club wonder.
We wanted a more decisive player, creativity to link up with players behind him, while creating space for himself to score. Diego was more suited to be a high playmaker that created chances for a much more offensive team then we were, and was average at goalscoring. he wasent quite what we needed on del piero's spot. we needed Aguero.
I think this would be the same for crapandowski.
He is the point in a very fast paced counterattacking team, supported by fastpaced flanks, and gotze who draws alot of attention to him.crapandowski doesnt carry the team, he is more of a one dimensional poacher, that suits dortmund very good. for this reason i also like him to stay i want dortmund to do well.
We are not a faced paced counter team, we are a pressing team that look to a deep target that can draw defenders onto him and still keep possession, that can link with vucinic around him. If we have a player like that, that draws attention, the forward runs of vidal and especially marchisio will become alot more commen. in addition we'd like this target to be competend with any kind of feed. areal bals from the flank or pirlo, trough balls from vidal/marchisio, cut back passes from the wingbacks, combined short passes with vucinic/marchisio.
crapandowski does none of that at dortmund. Llorente on the other hand, is pretty much the archetype of player i just described there.