Premier League 2019/20 (15 Viewers)

[X Æ A-12]

Yo Paratici,

one Kevin De Bruyne please.

Thank you

 

Buy on AliExpress.com

[Nejc]

How many of us believe in backing off at 5-0 (or maybe 6 or 7-0) so as to not completely humiliate your rival.

At that point it is the conceding teams duty to leave.

 

[JuveJay]

85th min: 8:0.
I've never seen a 10:0 in top class football.

I remember 9-0 Man Utd vs Ipswich.

 

[Ronn]

Yo Paratici,

one Kevin De Bruyne please.

Thank you

sure son. Here you go:

Spoiler

 

[Dantes]

Ouch

Played well enough to win, and would have been 2-0 up with 25 mins to go against a good Leicester if it weren't for a terrible VAR intervention.

There is no way that the manual pausing of frame-by-frame video tech can be this accurate where decisions are given on the matter of millimetres. The thickness of the vertical line is larger than the margin of offside FFS. At worst this is 'level' and the benefit of the doubt should go to the attacker.

PL really struggling with VAR this season.

 

[fredrik]

Offside is offside

 

[Dantes]

Offside is offside

And you can be certain this is offside? No. You cannot. Don't be flippant.

 

[kappa96]

Played well enough to win, and would have been 2-0 up with 10 mins to go against a good Leicester if it weren't for a terrible VAR intervention.

There is no way that the manual pausing of frame-by-frame video tech can be this accurate where decisions are given on the matter of millimetres. The thickness of the vertical line is larger than the margin of offside FFS. At worst this is 'level' and the benefit of the doubt should go to the attacker.

PL really struggling with VAR this season.

Clear offside although there are only 1 maybe 2 cm. Though call, but the right one. The angle makes it harder to spot it.

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

 

[Dantes]

Clear offside although there are only 1 maybe 2 cm. Though call, but the right one.

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

 

[fredrik]

Clear offside although there are only 1 maybe 2 cm. Though call, but the right one. The angle makes it harder to spot it.

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

Yeah, but if you look at the screen from a 60 degree angle its clearer

 

[kappa96]

For me it's clear, because I see it objectively.
We had one against Parma, when Ronaldo scored. Though, but fair.
Do you need him to be half a meter at least or10 cm? Make a memorandum to the pl officials to start calling them that way that offised should be counted starting from there. You have video proof. What more do you want.

- - - Updated - - -

Yeah, but if you look at the screen from a 60 degree angle its clearer

You need to look at it from an objective point a view for that to be obvious.

 

[Cerval]

Played well enough to win, and would have been 2-0 up with 25 mins to go against a good Leicester if it weren't for a terrible VAR intervention.

There is no way that the manual pausing of frame-by-frame video tech can be this accurate where decisions are given on the matter of millimetres. The thickness of the vertical line is larger than the margin of offside FFS. At worst this is 'level' and the benefit of the doubt should go to the attacker.

PL really struggling with VAR this season.

You guys need to play better in the second half. Olympiakos, Leicester, etc.

 

[juventus4life]

Watford was being Khalifa'd. That's what happens when a club let a pornstar getting in players' dressing room.

 

[JuveJay]

Which part of the Spurs player is offside? I don't understand what the line is showing.

 

[il brutto]

Which part of the Spurs player is offside? I don't understand what the line is showing.

Shoulder

 

[AllegriGOAT]

What a joke. EPL stans need to look at themselves first before bragging their 'superior' league

 

[Dantes]

And this from Leicester supporters ...

 

[il brutto]

And this from Leicester supporters ...

Didn't see you complaining when it benefitted you against City.

VAR rocks. Clarifying correct decisions against Man City for Spurs in 2019 x2+.

Sure they can roll over the likes of West Ham 4-0. But we ain't scrubs. Two shots on target. Two goals. I'll take that away from home. LOL.

 

[Dantes]

Didn't see you complaining when it benefitted you against City.

When the decision was correct and unnambiguous? No.

It's gone against us in other matches, but this is the first time we've been royally fucked by ridiculous application.

It's been quite farcical this season. In another game Raheem Sterling’s effort was adjudged to have been 2.4 cm offside for City against West Ham when he was running so fast he would have moved 13 cm between frames.

Need to build in a margin of error, and give the benefit to the attacker (or this nonsense will keep happening).

 

[il brutto]

When the decision was correct and unnambiguous? No.

It's gone against us in other matches, but this is the first time we've been royally fucked by ridiculous application.

It's been quite farcical this season. In another game Raheem Sterling’s effort was adjudged to have been 2.4 cm offside for City against West Ham when he was running so fast he would have moved 13 cm between frames.

Need to build in a margin of error, and give the benefit to the attacker (or this nonsense will keep happening).

Please. Handballs are rarely unambiguous. The decision is only "correct" and "unambiguous" when it benefits your team.

It doesn't really matter as long as the rules are the same for everyone. I don't really know how what you're proposing changes anything. You add a 10 cm margin of error and next the likes of you will cry that it's only 10.5 cm offside so how do we know that it's not a mistake by VAR.