I think that too much price for him. Strike swap with Miccoli is enough...
d.nico Senior Member Jul 4, 2005 #41 Apr 23, 2003 2,244 Jul 4, 2005 #41 d.nico Jul 4, 2005 I think that too much price for him. Strike swap with Miccoli is enough... Buy on AliExpress.com
- vOnAm - Senior Member Jul 4, 2005 #42 Jul 22, 2004 3,779 Jul 4, 2005 #42 - vOnAm - Jul 4, 2005 yeah, miccoli and Pizzaro are about the same level. but if they dont accept it, I dont mind givin up Blasi.
yeah, miccoli and Pizzaro are about the same level. but if they dont accept it, I dont mind givin up Blasi.
d.nico Senior Member Jul 4, 2005 #43 Apr 23, 2003 2,244 Jul 4, 2005 #43 d.nico Jul 4, 2005 I prefer we give them miccoli + one of montero/birindeli/pesotto
Dominic Senior Member Jul 4, 2005 #44 Jan 30, 2004 16,706 Jul 4, 2005 #44 Dominic Jul 4, 2005 According to udinese, they will only sell Pizarro to any team if they bid for him before the 5th of july. Haha, we'd better hurry up then.
According to udinese, they will only sell Pizarro to any team if they bid for him before the 5th of july. Haha, we'd better hurry up then.
Zlatan Senior Member Jul 4, 2005 #45 Jun 9, 2003 23,049 Jul 4, 2005 #45 Zlatan Jul 4, 2005 If he plays for Udinese in the CL quals we can kiss him goodbye.
Dominic Senior Member Jul 4, 2005 #46 Jan 30, 2004 16,706 Jul 4, 2005 #46 Dominic Jul 4, 2005 The CL qualifiers are exactly the reason why Udinese want to sell him before tomorrow. I don't think such a 'threat' will impress the 'big' clubs though.
The CL qualifiers are exactly the reason why Udinese want to sell him before tomorrow. I don't think such a 'threat' will impress the 'big' clubs though.
- vOnAm - Senior Member Jul 4, 2005 #47 Jul 22, 2004 3,779 Jul 4, 2005 #47 - vOnAm - Jul 4, 2005 I prefer we give them montero + birindelli + a new model Fiat
Mr. Gol Senior Member Jul 4, 2005 #48 Sep 15, 2004 3,472 Jul 4, 2005 #48 Mr. Gol Jul 4, 2005 They can still choose to bench him to increase the chance he will leave. Inter didn´t play Vieri and Cannavaro against Basel last season for the same reason.
They can still choose to bench him to increase the chance he will leave. Inter didn´t play Vieri and Cannavaro against Basel last season for the same reason.
#10 Senior Member Jul 4, 2005 #49 Jul 28, 2002 7,377 Jul 4, 2005 #49 #10 Jul 4, 2005 udi will be stubborn and play him...or if they are already in negotiations then they may drop him.
Edge Senior Member Jul 4, 2005 #50 Jun 14, 2004 800 Jul 4, 2005 #50 Edge Jul 4, 2005 I think if Udinese don't accept a player swap deal from us, then he is off to Inter.
- vOnAm - Senior Member Jul 4, 2005 #51 Jul 22, 2004 3,779 Jul 4, 2005 #51 - vOnAm - Jul 4, 2005 well the reports claim udinese want it all in cash.
#10 Senior Member Jul 4, 2005 #52 Jul 28, 2002 7,377 Jul 4, 2005 #52 #10 Jul 4, 2005 ++ [ originally posted by - vOnAm - ] ++ well the reports claim udinese want it all in cash. Click to expand... But surely tudor/Micco/Enzo would be appealing for them also?
++ [ originally posted by - vOnAm - ] ++ well the reports claim udinese want it all in cash. Click to expand... But surely tudor/Micco/Enzo would be appealing for them also?
- vOnAm - Senior Member Jul 4, 2005 #53 Jul 22, 2004 3,779 Jul 4, 2005 #53 - vOnAm - Jul 4, 2005 ++ [ originally posted by John #10 ] ++ But surely tudor/Micco/Enzo would be appealing for them also? Click to expand... I bet it would be but Im hearing we only want to give them up on co-ownership deals like the one we did with fiorentina. I dont really know why Inter would want Pizzaro, they have a lot of midfield options already.
++ [ originally posted by John #10 ] ++ But surely tudor/Micco/Enzo would be appealing for them also? Click to expand... I bet it would be but Im hearing we only want to give them up on co-ownership deals like the one we did with fiorentina. I dont really know why Inter would want Pizzaro, they have a lot of midfield options already.
#10 Senior Member Jul 4, 2005 #54 Jul 28, 2002 7,377 Jul 4, 2005 #54 #10 Jul 4, 2005 ++ [ originally posted by - vOnAm - ] ++ I bet it would be but Im hearing we only want to give them up on co-ownership deals like the one we did with fiorentina. I dont really know why Inter would want Pizzaro, they have a lot of midfield options already. Click to expand... since when have inter made sense
++ [ originally posted by - vOnAm - ] ++ I bet it would be but Im hearing we only want to give them up on co-ownership deals like the one we did with fiorentina. I dont really know why Inter would want Pizzaro, they have a lot of midfield options already. Click to expand... since when have inter made sense
#10 Senior Member Jul 4, 2005 #55 Jul 28, 2002 7,377 Jul 4, 2005 #55 #10 Jul 4, 2005 ++ [ originally posted by - vOnAm - ] ++ I bet it would be but Im hearing we only want to give them up on co-ownership deals like the one we did with fiorentina. I dont really know why Inter would want Pizzaro, they have a lot of midfield options already. Click to expand... since when have inter made sense
++ [ originally posted by - vOnAm - ] ++ I bet it would be but Im hearing we only want to give them up on co-ownership deals like the one we did with fiorentina. I dont really know why Inter would want Pizzaro, they have a lot of midfield options already. Click to expand... since when have inter made sense
#10 Senior Member Jul 4, 2005 #56 Jul 28, 2002 7,377 Jul 4, 2005 #56 #10 Jul 4, 2005 ++ [ originally posted by - vOnAm - ] ++ I bet it would be but Im hearing we only want to give them up on co-ownership deals like the one we did with fiorentina. I dont really know why Inter would want Pizzaro, they have a lot of midfield options already. Click to expand... since when have inter made sense
++ [ originally posted by - vOnAm - ] ++ I bet it would be but Im hearing we only want to give them up on co-ownership deals like the one we did with fiorentina. I dont really know why Inter would want Pizzaro, they have a lot of midfield options already. Click to expand... since when have inter made sense
#10 Senior Member Jul 4, 2005 #57 Jul 28, 2002 7,377 Jul 4, 2005 #57 #10 Jul 4, 2005 ++ [ originally posted by - vOnAm - ] ++ I bet it would be but Im hearing we only want to give them up on co-ownership deals like the one we did with fiorentina. I dont really know why Inter would want Pizzaro, they have a lot of midfield options already. Click to expand... since when have inter made sense
++ [ originally posted by - vOnAm - ] ++ I bet it would be but Im hearing we only want to give them up on co-ownership deals like the one we did with fiorentina. I dont really know why Inter would want Pizzaro, they have a lot of midfield options already. Click to expand... since when have inter made sense
#10 Senior Member Jul 4, 2005 #58 Jul 28, 2002 7,377 Jul 4, 2005 #58 #10 Jul 4, 2005 ++ [ originally posted by - vOnAm - ] ++ I bet it would be but Im hearing we only want to give them up on co-ownership deals like the one we did with fiorentina. I dont really know why Inter would want Pizzaro, they have a lot of midfield options already. Click to expand... since when have inter made sense
++ [ originally posted by - vOnAm - ] ++ I bet it would be but Im hearing we only want to give them up on co-ownership deals like the one we did with fiorentina. I dont really know why Inter would want Pizzaro, they have a lot of midfield options already. Click to expand... since when have inter made sense
#10 Senior Member Jul 4, 2005 #59 Jul 28, 2002 7,377 Jul 4, 2005 #59 #10 Jul 4, 2005 ++ [ originally posted by - vOnAm - ] ++ I bet it would be but Im hearing we only want to give them up on co-ownership deals like the one we did with fiorentina. I dont really know why Inter would want Pizzaro, they have a lot of midfield options already. Click to expand... since when have inter made sense btw i think i jus broke the 60 second rule
++ [ originally posted by - vOnAm - ] ++ I bet it would be but Im hearing we only want to give them up on co-ownership deals like the one we did with fiorentina. I dont really know why Inter would want Pizzaro, they have a lot of midfield options already. Click to expand... since when have inter made sense btw i think i jus broke the 60 second rule
- vOnAm - Senior Member Jul 4, 2005 #60 Jul 22, 2004 3,779 Jul 4, 2005 #60 - vOnAm - Jul 4, 2005 so the new Martin erased that rule? Cool ....let me try
