Philipp Lahm (11 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Mark

The Informer
Administrator
Dec 19, 2003
97,652
#22
He has problems to renew his contract with Bayern and we are showing interest him recently.

Someone mentioned before (Mark?) that Zanetti could end up in Bayern at the end of the season?Is this what is our staff is planning?Some swap + :money: ? Or maybe we are going to let Bayern sign Flamini...


Anyway what do you think of him?
never mentioned this and that rumor sounds like BS.
 

Luca

Senior Member
Apr 22, 2007
12,750
#23
^ Mark why are you ruining our summer transfer window with that avatar?
Anyway Lahm would be great, who would you go for between him and Evra?
 

Lion

King of Tuz
Jan 24, 2007
36,185
#28
Lahm would be better in the sense that if we get him and once De Ceglie can hold his own, we can shift him to RB and get rid of Zebina.

However as of right now LB is the weakest link in the team so any decent LB will do. It would be a bonus if that LB is in the caliber of someone like Evra or Lahm
 

Luca

Senior Member
Apr 22, 2007
12,750
#29
I had Sissoko and Mellberg this winter.
ah touché my friend, touché.
which oher player did you have? I forgot who it was but there was definatly 3, was it a palermo player?

I hope your jinxes don't work the opposite way to what you intend them :wallbang:
 

Lion

King of Tuz
Jan 24, 2007
36,185
#31
yeah, but the difference is that you didn't want any of those players (yet we ended up with 2 of them, and could get the last)

while every time you put up an avatar of a player you WANTED, we ended up not getting him.

so folks, if we lose out on Flamini and Huntelaar you know who we can crucify :D
 

Luca

Senior Member
Apr 22, 2007
12,750
#33
yeah, but the difference is that you didn't want any of those players (yet we ended up with 2 of them, and could get the last)

while every time you put up an avatar of a player you WANTED, we ended up not getting him.

so folks, if we lose out on Flamini and Huntelaar you know who we can crucify :D
My pitch fork and torch is already out, Mark :D
 

Mark

The Informer
Administrator
Dec 19, 2003
97,652
#34
yeah, but the difference is that you didn't want any of those players (yet we ended up with 2 of them, and could get the last)

while every time you put up an avatar of a player you WANTED, we ended up not getting him.

so folks, if we lose out on Flamini and Huntelaar you know who we can crucify :D
My pitch fork and torch is already out, Mark :D

Aquilani and Amauri wouldn't be that bad. :D
 
OP
Dostoevsky

Dostoevsky

Tzu
Administrator
May 27, 2007
88,998
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread Starter #35
    never mentioned this and that rumor sounds like BS.
    Weird.I thought you were the one who said Zanetti could go to Bayern.Doesn`t matter I guess.

    yeah, but the difference is that you didn't want any of those players (yet we ended up with 2 of them, and could get the last)

    while every time you put up an avatar of a player you WANTED, we ended up not getting him.

    so folks, if we lose out on Flamini and Huntelaar you know who we can crucify :D
    Be aware,Mark.

    :D
     

    Mark

    The Informer
    Administrator
    Dec 19, 2003
    97,652
    #36
    Weird.I thought you were the one who said Zanetti could go to Bayern.Doesn`t matter I guess.



    Be aware,Mark.

    :D
    I'll ban all your asses and send you to xtratime just before the official announcement of Flamini to Bayern and Huntelaar to Milan. :D
     

    Lion

    King of Tuz
    Jan 24, 2007
    36,185
    #38
    and then once I am banned, I will go there and trash talk about you, and when I come back pretend that I didn't trash talk you.
     

    Luca

    Senior Member
    Apr 22, 2007
    12,750
    #39
    Aquilani and Amauri wouldn't be that bad. :D
    it wouldn't be too bad but you your self prefer huntelaar, is that right?
    and who could resist a combination of sissoko flamini when we can potentially call them sissini or flamoko? :D
     
    Status
    Not open for further replies.

    Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 11)