Petition to get Claire reinstated (2 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Bjerknes

"Top Economist"
Mar 16, 2004
116,141
#41
++ [ originally posted by jaecole ] ++


Burke was already at it before I joined. Claire didn't even provoke Burke that much, this is a completely unfair statement. Go back and read it. Claire did not provoke Burke first, she didn't make an agenda against Burke. She (quite rightfully) responded to abuse from him. She remained cool while played with his mind and had him breakdown, just like you.

Don't blame Claire for Burke. That's not fair. She should commended for how she handled that. And don't bother putting me in that either, I was just a fellow poster like you were.

That all said. She dosen't even want to be unbanned so this thread although a nice jesture, is a waste of time.
That's ridiculous and you know it. Actually you don't know it because you have only been here since April, so you have no clue what you're talking about. The trouble between Burke and Claire started in February at least, albeit from issues involving Americans to music. I don't know if she was set out to get anybody however it's obvious she was here for one purpose: to provoke people. We have several posters here in this thread who concur with me and they have been here quite longer than you, when the arguments first started. Mind games? Sure, call them what you want, it's still provocation. Like I said before there is no smoke without fire.

You on the other hand have provoked people with racial comments towards Italians, recently calling out Nicole for no reaon when several other members do exactly the same thing, even saying I suck at football without ever seeing me play, among others. Do you consider that provocation jaecole?
 

Buy on AliExpress.com
Apr 12, 2004
77,165
#42
++ [ originally posted by jaecole ] ++


Burke was already at it before I joined. Claire didn't even provoke Burke that much, this is a completely unfair statement. Go back and read it. Claire did not provoke Burke first, she didn't make an agenda against Burke. She (quite rightfully) responded to abuse from him. She remained cool while played with his mind and had him breakdown, just like you.

Don't blame Claire for Burke. That's not fair. She should commended for how she handled that. And don't bother putting me in that either, I was just a fellow poster like you were.

That all said. She dosen't even want to be unbanned so this thread although a nice jesture, is a waste of time.
It was defenitely more Emma than it was Claire that eventually led me down that dark path of righteous banning.
 

JCK

Biased
JCK
May 11, 2004
125,388
#44
++ [ originally posted by jaecole ] ++


Actually that's the first time I've said that. And that's not even what I said. I didn't create this thread and I never asked for her to be unbanned. I don't care. Chill out.
I think Shadowfax said your posts, not your threads.
 

jaecole

Senior Member
Apr 7, 2005
3,017
#45
++ [ originally posted by Shadowfax ] ++


Its interesting that everytime she is banned someone (you , emma or herself in the support forum etc ) pops up and says she doesnt want unbanning anyway... Yet she allways comes back... Yeah she really hates the place and doesnt want to be here :rolleyes:
I'm only telling you what she said. She is done with the forum I guess. Trying to save the hassle of a moderator stepping down for no reason. And yeah it she wanted to come back she could easily do it. No need for all this hassle. But like I said, she is done with Juventuz so there is no need.

++ [ originally posted by Andy ] ++You on the other hand have provoked people with racial comments towards Italians, recently calling out Nicole for no reaon when several other members do exactly the same thing, among others. Do you consider that provocation jaecole?
So has everyone. So have you. Sometimes peoples comments are misplaced or taken badly. That's life. And the only reason I'm even posting on this is because you put my name with hers. I don't know about her plans, I can only say it how I see like you do. But to say I provoked Burke then you might aswell say you provoked Claire. Same thing.
 

jaecole

Senior Member
Apr 7, 2005
3,017
#47
++ [ originally posted by Bürke ] ++


It was defenitely more Emma than it was Claire that eventually led me down that dark path of righteous banning.
There you go. It's unfair to blame Claire for it when she wasn't involved imo but hell let's do it anyway.
 

Respaul

Senior Member
Jul 14, 2002
4,734
#48
++ [ originally posted by jaecole ] ++


I'm only telling you what she said. She is done with the forum I guess. Trying to save the hassle of a moderator stepping down for no reason. And yeah it she wanted to come back she could easily do it. No need for all this hassle. But like I said, she is done with Juventuz so there is no need.
My point was that every single time she says exactly the same thing and then allways comes back... why is this time any different
 

jaecole

Senior Member
Apr 7, 2005
3,017
#50
++ [ originally posted by Shadowfax ] ++


My point was that every single time she says exactly the same thing and then allways comes back... why is this time any different
Did I say it was? I said she didn't want to be unbanned. To make it clear she wasn't sitting around hoping they would unban. To make it clear that this thread isn't needed and nothing needs to be done. Jesus.
 

Bjerknes

"Top Economist"
Mar 16, 2004
116,141
#51
++ [ originally posted by Shadowfax ] ++


My point was that every single time she says exactly the same thing and then allways comes back... why is this time any different
I concur. She has returned from banning three times after saying three times she hates the place and does not want to return.
 

Respaul

Senior Member
Jul 14, 2002
4,734
#52
++ [ originally posted by jaecole ] ++


Sorry?
I said can you please edit your post as you didnt put the name of the person you quoted in the second part... So it appears i said both parts... which i didnt as you quoted me and then quoted andy... thank you
 

JCK

Biased
JCK
May 11, 2004
125,388
#54
++ [ originally posted by Andy ] ++


I concur. She has returned from banning three times after saying three times she hates the place and does not want to return.
Not only the place, each and every member of it.
 

Respaul

Senior Member
Jul 14, 2002
4,734
#55
++ [ originally posted by jaecole ] ++
Right sure. But how is that relevent to what I just said.
Its not relevant to the conversation at all... I jus dont want to be miss represented... If i didnt say something i dont want people thinking i did... jus common decency
 

jaecole

Senior Member
Apr 7, 2005
3,017
#56
Sorry but I'm completely not sure what you are referring to. I looked the post above and see nothing wrong. Quote or something.
 

Elnur_E65

Senior Member
Feb 21, 2004
10,848
#57
++ [ originally posted by Shadowfax ] ++
Out of interest Jae... Have you made a post in recent weeks that doesnt ***** about how mistreated claire and emma are or how great they are ? ... Can you really be that needy
I totally agree.

Jae, your buddies are not here, we don't want them here, and life goes on.

It's as simple as that.
 

Respaul

Senior Member
Jul 14, 2002
4,734
#58
++ [ originally posted by jaecole ] ++
Sorry but I'm completely not sure what you are referring to. I looked the post above and see nothing wrong. Quote or something.
the post directly above where i asked you to edit it... post number 45
 

Elnur_E65

Senior Member
Feb 21, 2004
10,848
#60
++ [ originally posted by Andy ] ++


I concur. She has returned from banning three times after saying three times she hates the place and does not want to return.
... and that, my friends, is called "flip-flopping" :D
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 2)