[Peace Cup] JUVENTUS 2-1 Real Madrid, July 31st 2009 (93 Viewers)

Elvin

Senior Member
Nov 25, 2005
36,865
#41
Is DC still injured or what? Ciro and not Siro(yeah, I'm talking to you GolTV announcers) uses Grygera, Brazzo and even the gardener at LB not to start Molinaro. :p

If De Ceglie and Zebina play as we want them to play we could have some fun this year. We look good now. Imagine when we get the fullbacks in the game.
Ugh How do these people get jobs FFS? everytime I heard him say Siro, I felt like punching my speakers lol
 

Buy on AliExpress.com

abejaa

Senior Member
Sep 25, 2006
1,665
#42
Eℓvin;2087225 said:
Ugh How do these people get jobs FFS? everytime I heard him say Siro, I felt like punching my speakers lol
lol it was so annoying, i muted the volume then then started to listening to system of a down, a lot more better :D
 

Alen

Ѕenior Аdmin
Apr 2, 2007
52,574
#46
Eℓvin;2087225 said:
Ugh How do these people get jobs FFS? everytime I heard him say Siro, I felt like punching my speakers lol
I felt like punching them when i heard them how they say Salihamidzic (Salihimovic, Salihamjic etc) but it's tough for foreigners to pronounce his name, so it's a forgivable mistake.
But calling Ciro-Siro and saying Giuve or Giuventus all the fucking time, was a mistake that should get them fired.
 

Suns

Release clause?
May 22, 2009
21,929
#49
Please don't tell me that 4-3-3 formations are like your tedious 4-2-3-1.
4-3-3 and 4-2-3-1 were the formations the best teams in CL last season used. You said that a formation with one forward was bullshit and its actually the opposite.
 

JCK

Biased
JCK
May 11, 2004
123,580
#50
I still insist on formations with one forward is bullshit because 4-3-3 is nothing like 4-2-3-1 or 4-5-1. Now soap it.
 

Alen

Ѕenior Аdmin
Apr 2, 2007
52,574
#51
I wonder how he managed to say "Zero Immobile" without laughing. Yes, he pronounced Immobile like the English word.
He did say that :lol:

He was talking how our 4 main strikers are all +29 and how the 5th one, Siro Immobile (the English word) is still in his teens. :)
 

Alen

Ѕenior Аdmin
Apr 2, 2007
52,574
#52
I still insist on formations with one forward is bullshit because 4-3-3 is nothing like 4-2-3-1 or 4-5-1. Now soap it.
Milan's 4-3-2-1 worked well, but only for a limited period (fortunately for them, it happened at the right time, in the later stages of the 2006/07 season).
4-2-3-1 is indeed a very silly formation, while 4-5-1 sounds so mid-tablish. Perfect for a team like Sampdoria defending against a favorite.

And stupid or not in general, it doesn't really matter, because Juve have 4 forwards of great quality. It will be a crime if we play a 1 forward formation.
 

Suns

Release clause?
May 22, 2009
21,929
#58
I still insist on formations with one forward is bullshit because 4-3-3 is nothing like 4-2-3-1 or 4-5-1. Now soap it.
Yeah, tell that to Liverpool, Chelsea, Man Utd and Barcelona.

4-3-1-2 just has 3 offensive players and 7 defensive players. If Diego has a bad game then we are pretty much fucked. And our fullbacks are not good enough for this formation either.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 92)