I'm sorry, but that's stupid, and that's not how it works or is supposed to work. Why the fuck should Dybala be the one singled out?
Also, why are we potentially setting ourselves up for failure? I don't like this loser mentality with too many ifs and buts.
But that is how you calculated risk.
And for the Rabiot and Ramsey, they actually only in range 5m, because we actually paying their transfer fee to them as bigger salary.
And it will be better if Juve using salary + bonus method (6m base, 1m serie A, 3m UCL)
You lower the risk of overpay using bonus if we not win. But if we win we actually have all the money to pay that bonuses. Maybe for UCL it can be progreasive, starting 500k for group stage, 1M total for QF, 2M total for SF win
It happen in work too, company paid lower base salary but bigger bonus if the employee achieve their target. With employee achieve the target (ex: sales target), company get more income and can pay that big bonus
So the employee still get better income.
But it will affect the amount of severance pay, especially the one with longer service period.
Sometimes, company using so much other income as long as not increase the basic salary. Because severence pay are calculated base on base salary (not include other income)
Sent from my RMX1921 using Tapatalk