Paulo Dybala (189 Viewers)

Legend or Rookie? ***non-official poll***


  • Total voters
    140
  • Poll closed .

LiquidPLP

Senior Member
Jun 9, 2012
12,237
People gonna crucify me, but I'd honestly trade Dybala for the little Koala :D
At this point it wouldn't make sense one bit. We've got Pjanic who is doing very well and losing Dybala not only creates a hole but leaves us with Pjanic being redundant. Also Verratti doesn't have the impact Dybala has. Marketing potential is important here as well.

I think we should be past the point where we cash in on players to bring new ones. Sure it means we have to pay bigger wages to our players and we won't be buying WC players every next window but we don't have to. We need stability more than anything at this point. I mean no other big club does so much reshuffling as we do, at least not the ones we aspire to.

I'd love to have Verratti here :)tuttosport:) but not at the expense of Dybala, no way.
 
Jan 22, 2016
2,188
At this point it wouldn't make sense one bit. We've got Pjanic who is doing very well and losing Dybala not only creates a hole but leaves us with Pjanic being redundant. Also Verratti doesn't have the impact Dybala has. Marketing potential is important here as well.

I think we should be past the point where we cash in on players to bring new ones. Sure it means we have to pay bigger wages to our players and we won't be buying WC players every next window but we don't have to. We need stability more than anything at this point. I mean no other big club does so much reshuffling as we do, at least not the ones we aspire to.

I'd love to have Verratti here :)tuttosport:) but not at the expense of Dybala, no way.
How about Sanchez+Verratti?
 

Ocelot

Midnight Marauder
Jul 13, 2013
18,943
Ffs :sergio;

Insta-ban for this peasant pls.
I'd prefer to have both of course, but I think it'd be a good trade in the long run.

- - - Updated - - -

At this point it wouldn't make sense one bit. We've got Pjanic who is doing very well and losing Dybala not only creates a hole but leaves us with Pjanic being redundant. Also Verratti doesn't have the impact Dybala has. Marketing potential is important here as well.

I think we should be past the point where we cash in on players to bring new ones. Sure it means we have to pay bigger wages to our players and we won't be buying WC players every next window but we don't have to. We need stability more than anything at this point. I mean no other big club does so much reshuffling as we do, at least not the ones we aspire to.

I'd love to have Verratti here :)tuttosport:) but not at the expense of Dybala, no way.
I wouldn't sell Dybala at all if he doesn't want to leave, but the main reason I disagree with you is the following: With Verratti, our midfield would be settled for the next decade. Can't see that happening for Dybala and our attack, simply because I don't believe he'll stay here forever anyways.

And I probably rate Verratti a bit higher than you.
 

zizinho

Senior Member
Apr 14, 2013
51,816
At this point it wouldn't make sense one bit. We've got Pjanic who is doing very well and losing Dybala not only creates a hole but leaves us with Pjanic being redundant. Also Verratti doesn't have the impact Dybala has. Marketing potential is important here as well.

I think we should be past the point where we cash in on players to bring new ones. Sure it means we have to pay bigger wages to our players and we won't be buying WC players every next window but we don't have to. We need stability more than anything at this point. I mean no other big club does so much reshuffling as we do, at least not the ones we aspire to.

I'd love to have Verratti here :)tuttosport:) but not at the expense of Dybala, no way.
I dont see a problem with Pjanic and Verratti tbh. We would simply move Pjanic up to AM and play Verratti and Marchisio behind (talking about the 4231)
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 159)