Paul Pogba (158 Viewers)
- Thread starter Lo-Pan
- Start date
It's the same in Italy. Pogba's sale nets us 105 mil minus fees. The corporate chargeable gains tax only gets charged if we make a profit on the year. But it still means the net positive of the transfer has to take into account the tax allowances and reliefs we have to use to offset that gain.
The exact same thing happens in England.
The net positive from my understanding of corporate tax on chargeable gains doesn't mean we are actually paying the government 20 mil of the Pogba fee. It will be offset by purchases and other spending. But it still has to be taken into account in terms of economic net positive.
The exact same thing happens in England.
The net positive from my understanding of corporate tax on chargeable gains doesn't mean we are actually paying the government 20 mil of the Pogba fee. It will be offset by purchases and other spending. But it still has to be taken into account in terms of economic net positive.
Seems like he was sold a long time ago and we already reinvested the money.
A little underwhelming mercato for me.
Hopefully we sign two good MF, because right now we lost what made us great the last few years, our MF and if we are relying on cripple KHedira and relying on marchisio to come back to his previous form after an ACL injury, we are in for a bad surprise in the CL.
A little underwhelming mercato for me.
Hopefully we sign two good MF, because right now we lost what made us great the last few years, our MF and if we are relying on cripple KHedira and relying on marchisio to come back to his previous form after an ACL injury, we are in for a bad surprise in the CL.
Noooo. I'm not saying you pay taxes on the 10 mil if you lose 10 mil.
I'm saying you have to lose 10 mil in order to not pay taxes on the 10 mil you made.
It's the same in Italy.
The net positive has to take into account that we would pay 21 mil on 105 mil chargeable gain of we didn't have losses equalling that in the rest of our operations for that year.
You have to use reliefs and allowances from losses to cover corporate gains. On your financial statement you still have to show the tax allowances used to offset that gain.
I'm saying you have to lose 10 mil in order to not pay taxes on the 10 mil you made.
It's the same in Italy.
The net positive has to take into account that we would pay 21 mil on 105 mil chargeable gain of we didn't have losses equalling that in the rest of our operations for that year.
You have to use reliefs and allowances from losses to cover corporate gains. On your financial statement you still have to show the tax allowances used to offset that gain.
Or you're agreeing with me. We've both been saying the same thing. Only I've been saying it operates the exact same way in Italy and is still essentially a chargeable gains tax. Even an individual if he could manage to build up tax allowances through losses can offset capital gains tax with those.
Italy is the same as everywhere. Only we release our financials. And on financials you have to account for the allowances used which means the net positive effect goes down 21 million.
We won't actually pay the tax if our corporation comes out even at the end of year and has tax allowances to cover it.
Italy is the same as everywhere. Only we release our financials. And on financials you have to account for the allowances used which means the net positive effect goes down 21 million.
We won't actually pay the tax if our corporation comes out even at the end of year and has tax allowances to cover it.
:
Statistically those who leave us and end up in EPL are cunts, specially those that are not respectful towards the club, so there are bigger pricks than him if I were to wish worst things to someone 
But I don't care much about this transfer tbh. Yeah it's sad we lost one of the most marketable players and a really great CM. But from personality side I was never a fan of his dab shit or his hairstyles or any of his other shenanigans. We got 100+ mil so that ain't bad I guess.
Manchester sold ronaldo, best player in the world with a record fee, that didn't mean they became a seller club, jsut that the player wanted a new challenge at all costs.
In an ideal world he would do a slide tackle and miss but would hit conte and would crush contes balls while fracturing every bone in his body. Other then that I'm indifferent
But I don't care much about this transfer tbh. Yeah it's sad we lost one of the most marketable players and a really great CM. But from personality side I was never a fan of his dab shit or his hairstyles or any of his other shenanigans. We got 100+ mil so that ain't bad I guess.
Manchester sold ronaldo, best player in the world with a record fee, that didn't mean they became a seller club, jsut that the player wanted a new challenge at all costs.
In an ideal world he would do a slide tackle and miss but would hit conte and would crush contes balls while fracturing every bone in his body. Other then that I'm indifferent
I love how you are still keeping the Conte-hate going strong.
According to this link:
https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lijst_van_duurste_voetbaltransfers
David Luiz with 50Meuro to PSG.
https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lijst_van_duurste_voetbaltransfers
David Luiz with 50Meuro to PSG.
