Patrik Schick - ST - Sampdoria (16 Viewers)

[JuveJay]

http://m.tuttojuve.com/calciomercato/gazzetta-fatta-per-schick-non-solo-soldi-374991

What a troll.

 

Buy on AliExpress.com

[Gep]

So they'd pick 2 between Orsolini, Favilli, Romagna and Mandragora.

I don't really mind that. I'd like us to keep and give some chances to Bentancur.

I think sending Bentancur out on loan for 1 season will be beneficial for both us and player. Toughen him up and hopefully play more than he would do with us anyway. Better him playing at least 60% of games than a mere 10% with us. He can get to know the rest of our team next season.

 

[Gagi]

Shick, loan, what? Getting a player on loan with an obligation sounds like avoiding FFP trouble. We just had a great financial year and haven't signed anyone yet. Are we about to spend really big on other targets?

 

[Gep]

Shick, loan, what? Getting a player on loan with an obligation sounds like avoiding FFP trouble. We just had a great financial year and haven't signed anyone yet. Are we about to spend really big on other targets?

Yes. It's Verratti and Costa.

 

[thirteen]

wat?

Makes no sense at all lol.

Exactly. Samp burdens the risk in this deal. I bet other clubs like inter would just pay the clause.

 

[Gagi]

Bear in mind that we're still paying a lot of money for players that are already here. We don't do cash deals.

 

[Dostoevsky]

Bear in mind that we're still paying a lot of money for players that are already here. We don't do cash deals.

That's not the case with us only but pretty much with every single team out there. Even when it's reported 20, 30 or even 70mln euro transfers they are all done in installments.

 

[PhRoZeN]

That's not the case with us only but pretty much with every single team out there. Even when it's reported 20, 30 or even 70mln euro transfers they are all done in installments.

But it's a different matter when it comes to release clauses right?

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

 

[JCK]

wat?

Makes no sense at all lol.

Of course it does, it is only a way to regulate transfer budget. It means we are doing a big signing this season and delaying the payment for Schick for next summer.

- - - Updated - - -

But it's a different matter when it comes to release clauses right?

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

Release clauses can also be paid in instalments.

 

[Salvo]

Sounds good, Samp will get there money next year and we can strengthen them with two youngsters for next season. It's a win win.

Sent from my Nexus 6P using Tapatalk

 

[Osman]

Shick, loan, what? Getting a player on loan with an obligation sounds like avoiding FFP trouble. We just had a great financial year and haven't signed anyone yet. Are we about to spend really big on other targets?

Was about to say same. If we insist on loan with obligation, it means we about to go Ham in net spending

Skickat från min SM-G930F via Tapatalk

 

[Durden]

So they'd pick 2 between Orsolini, Favilli, Romagna and Mandragora.

I don't really mind that. I'd like us to keep and give some chances to Bentancur.

Do we still own Favilli? I thought we sold him some years ago

 

[Gagi]

Beppe has a history of offering players we don't own

 

[JuveJay]

Do we still own Favilli? I thought we sold him some years ago

Ascoli own Favilli, he was only on loan here. I'd be surprised if we don't have some kind of agreement though, we are very close with Ascoli.

 

[Durden]

Beppe has a history of offering players we don't own

the great Master

- - - Updated - - -

Ascoli own Favilli, he was only on loan here. I'd be surprised if we don't have some kind of agreement though, we are very close with Ascoli.

 

[RAMI-N]

Was about to say same. If we insist on loan with obligation, it means we about to go Ham in net spending

Skickat från min SM-G930F via Tapatalk

Verratti

 

[piotrr]

Was about to say same. If we insist on loan with obligation, it means we about to go Ham in net spending

Skickat från min SM-G930F via Tapatalk

Bernadeschi for 60m.

 

[lgorTudor]

it means we about to go Ham in net spending

 

[Juve_fanatic]

Dont want this player..... He doesnt have a defencive contribution

 

[Mark]

you still haven't wrote defensive right once.