Patrik Schick - ST - Sampdoria (15 Viewers)
- Thread starter Mark
- Start date
- Status
Really? 
If that is because of the medical where a potential heart condition was found, and he is butthurt over it, then he's more of a prima donna than Keita. At least that kid WANTS to come here.
If that is because of the medical where a potential heart condition was found, and he is butthurt over it, then he's more of a prima donna than Keita. At least that kid WANTS to come here.
Skickat från min SM-G930F via Tapatalk
great way to destroy your potential.
icemaη;5595950 said:
You mad he didn't choose Roma 
I think he's a great and unique player. Reminds me a lot of Morata and such players come once in a blue moon. I'd pick him ahead of Keita quite easily. However, it would be MUCH easiler if we played with 2 strikers, so we could rotate Schick with Dybala/Pipita. IMO playing Schick on a wing in 4-2-3-1 would be a huge waste, so he'd warm our bench quite a lot here.
Icard - Schick is seriously a deadly duo imo. I'm just hoping Inter pulls an Inter and destroys yet another young talent like they have done trillions of times. If he does explode there then holy shit, those two are going to score shitload of goals, Schick is gonna feed him too. Great move by Inter as long as they don't fuck up on him. He would also play on the wing for Roma which is another waste, cause there's no way he'd bench Dzeko. So, imo, it seems he chose a club where he'd play the most in the position that's suited for him.
It's up to the old lady to accept either Keita or Schick as her boyfriend now?
I haven't seen him play much, but I believe you 
I'm mad we didn't sign him here I think he's a great and unique player. Reminds me a lot of Morata and such players come once in a blue moon. I'd pick him ahead of Keita quite easily.
However, it would be MUCH easiler if we played with 2 strikers, so we could rotate Schick with Dybala/Pipita. IMO playing Schick on a wing in 4-2-3-1 would be a huge waste, so he'd warm our bench quite a lot here.
Icard - Schick is seriously a deadly duo imo. I'm just hoping Inter pulls an Inter and destroys yet another young talent like they have done trillions of times. If he does explode there then holy shit, those two are going to score shitload of goals, Schick is gonna feed him too. Great move by Inter as long as they don't fuck up on him. He would also play on the wing for Roma which is another waste, cause there's no way he'd bench Dzeko. So, imo, it seems he chose a club where he'd play the most in the position that's suited for him.
I think he's a great and unique player. Reminds me a lot of Morata and such players come once in a blue moon. I'd pick him ahead of Keita quite easily. However, it would be MUCH easiler if we played with 2 strikers, so we could rotate Schick with Dybala/Pipita. IMO playing Schick on a wing in 4-2-3-1 would be a huge waste, so he'd warm our bench quite a lot here.
Icard - Schick is seriously a deadly duo imo. I'm just hoping Inter pulls an Inter and destroys yet another young talent like they have done trillions of times. If he does explode there then holy shit, those two are going to score shitload of goals, Schick is gonna feed him too. Great move by Inter as long as they don't fuck up on him. He would also play on the wing for Roma which is another waste, cause there's no way he'd bench Dzeko. So, imo, it seems he chose a club where he'd play the most in the position that's suited for him.
According to his morning’s Gazzetta dello Sport, Roma are being asked to pay €30.5m for Schick, while Inter are hoping to take him on loan with an obligation tp buy.
However, the player himself would have no problem remaining at the Marassi for another year, knowing that his €25m release clause will become valid again next summer.
Juve could therefore just wait until next year to sign Schick, who it’s thought has contact with Czech Republic legend Pavel Nedved, the Old Lady’s Vice-President.
However, the player himself would have no problem remaining at the Marassi for another year, knowing that his €25m release clause will become valid again next summer.
Juve could therefore just wait until next year to sign Schick, who it’s thought has contact with Czech Republic legend Pavel Nedved, the Old Lady’s Vice-President.
I'm mad we didn't sign him here I think he's a great and unique player. Reminds me a lot of Morata and such players come once in a blue moon. I'd pick him ahead of Keita quite easily.
However, it would be MUCH easiler if we played with 2 strikers, so we could rotate Schick with Dybala/Pipita. IMO playing Schick on a wing in 4-2-3-1 would be a huge waste, so he'd warm our bench quite a lot here.
Icard - Schick is seriously a deadly duo imo. I'm just hoping Inter pulls an Inter and destroys yet another young talent like they have done trillions of times. If he does explode there then holy shit, those two are going to score shitload of goals, Schick is gonna feed him too. Great move by Inter as long as they don't fuck up on him. He would also play on the wing for Roma which is another waste, cause there's no way he'd bench Dzeko. So, imo, it seems he chose a club where he'd play the most in the position that's suited for him.
I think he's a great and unique player. Reminds me a lot of Morata and such players come once in a blue moon. I'd pick him ahead of Keita quite easily. However, it would be MUCH easiler if we played with 2 strikers, so we could rotate Schick with Dybala/Pipita. IMO playing Schick on a wing in 4-2-3-1 would be a huge waste, so he'd warm our bench quite a lot here.
Icard - Schick is seriously a deadly duo imo. I'm just hoping Inter pulls an Inter and destroys yet another young talent like they have done trillions of times. If he does explode there then holy shit, those two are going to score shitload of goals, Schick is gonna feed him too. Great move by Inter as long as they don't fuck up on him. He would also play on the wing for Roma which is another waste, cause there's no way he'd bench Dzeko. So, imo, it seems he chose a club where he'd play the most in the position that's suited for him.
Post #974
@Hustini @zizinho @Wittl
5 posts per year
- - - Updated - - -
That's not how it works Bro. Not buying him would result in a meltdown
Please disregard my post. I didn't see the FIF forum reference
@Hustini @zizinho @Wittl
5 posts per year
- - - Updated - - -
His thread has reached 60 pages or so in fif. Buying him would be worth it just to see the meltdown over there 
Please disregard my post. I didn't see the FIF forum reference
Honestly, the smart thing to do here is buy and loan out to Samp. His buyout next year is 25m and we had signed him for 30m. We have doubts about his fitness etc. So why not pay 3m now and agree to pay 25m next year pending fitness checks etc. That way Samp get to use him this season, we pay less than what we would have etc. Could be a win-win.
Post #974
@Hustini @zizinho @Wittl
5 posts per year
- - - Updated - - -
That's not how it works Bro. Not buying him would result in a meltdown
Please disregard my post. I didn't see the FIF forum reference
@Hustini @zizinho @Wittl
5 posts per year
- - - Updated - - -
That's not how it works Bro. Not buying him would result in a meltdown
Please disregard my post. I didn't see the FIF forum reference
- - - Updated - - -
That's a good point. Satisfy both parties. Knowing we can simply get him for 25m next summer, why not let us use that clause value now and let Samp having him for another year? They keep their key player and pocket 25m now to strengthen their team for this season. We don't "need" him yet. Seems like a sensible thing to do. I don't see Beppe screwing them like Lazio since Samp is his old club.
- Status