Pablo Armero - LWB - Udinese (81 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.
v1rtu4l

v1rtu4l

Senior Member
#589
Mar 4, 2008
6,349
#589
Gerd said:
You don't pay the money this year , say you have 12 mil left , and you need a lb and another players let's say a cm who also costs 10 mil . You can get the lb with this method and you are left 10 mil for the cm and you can have both players in the same season .
Second reason is because you don't pay the full amount in one year , you split installments which allows you not to make a minus in the account books
Click to expand...
you have to add to that, that the funds of transfers are coming from a different budget than the funds for the loans (which will get paid from the "wage budget").

so if you have spend all your transfer budget but you do have a few millions left in the wage budget you can simply acquire a player by loaning him with the remaining funds of wage budget.
in the end you should always use your full wage budget, because if you don't next season someone might cut the budget, because you was OK with less budget the season before.
 
MikeM

MikeM

Footballing Hipster celebrating 4th place with Tuz
#595
Sep 21, 2008
12,493
#595
And you all laughed at Marotta's signings of Motta and Pepe. Pay $1 too much then and save $5 down the road when we go for their actual good players.
 
Nicholas

Nicholas

MIRKO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
#596
Jan 30, 2008
38,737
#596
MikeM said:
And you all laughed at Marotta's signings of Motta and Pepe. Pay $1 too much then and save $5 down the road when we go for their actual good players.
Click to expand...
We hardly saved :p

It just means we have the advantage in any negotiations with their players as is showing with Armero.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 79)