Oh My God, They Killed Kenny (41 Viewers)
- Thread starter Alen
- Start date
Yeah very convienent, or just explaining the basics to hoarde of rookies who are too lazy to read the rules. As I said in pre-game thread on my second post in this page: http://forum.juventuz.com/showthread.php?32952-Mafia-anyone&p=3052498&viewfull=1#post3052498
I preferred if people asked questions about how things work BEFORE the game. So it cant be conveniently used against me like you are trying to do right now.
And oh well you have try harder then that, just voting randomly and seeing if he reacts, and how will he react when its a single vote which cant pressure him, and when you even state your intent like above making even easier to ignore. Plus, besides analyzing Nate, your half-hearted effort can also be analyzed as bit of a G tactic, randomly voting for a civilian with no effort or reason other then to seem proactive.
Or possibly a G friend who indirectly distance yourself from by voting on a G. But for latter thinking, I think its way more likely that a G friend of yours would be Melo, because guy has lied through his teeth, been super suspicious in behaviour the more he posts, and finally the fucking D he knew (one of 2 individuals who did) suddenly dies, and you only say he is too obvious to be a G?
Ok, I got it to a point yesterday when we only had his crazy posts to base it on (despite acting off and lying as heck), but even after the D he knew gets offed, you say he is too crazy to be a G? Really. IMO its extremely likely some of those who voted no lynch last night was Gs covering for him, and your offhanded way to dismiss suspicion from him likewise is bit weird.
I preferred if people asked questions about how things work BEFORE the game. So it cant be conveniently used against me like you are trying to do right now.
And oh well you have try harder then that, just voting randomly and seeing if he reacts, and how will he react when its a single vote which cant pressure him, and when you even state your intent like above making even easier to ignore. Plus, besides analyzing Nate, your half-hearted effort can also be analyzed as bit of a G tactic, randomly voting for a civilian with no effort or reason other then to seem proactive.
Or possibly a G friend who indirectly distance yourself from by voting on a G. But for latter thinking, I think its way more likely that a G friend of yours would be Melo, because guy has lied through his teeth, been super suspicious in behaviour the more he posts, and finally the fucking D he knew (one of 2 individuals who did) suddenly dies, and you only say he is too obvious to be a G?
Ok, I got it to a point yesterday when we only had his crazy posts to base it on (despite acting off and lying as heck), but even after the D he knew gets offed, you say he is too crazy to be a G? Really. IMO its extremely likely some of those who voted no lynch last night was Gs covering for him, and your offhanded way to dismiss suspicion from him likewise is bit weird.
Yeah true, not saying its the same scenario as last night, or was enough to lynch on, but entirely too many where going with the thinking that Melo is too crazy/too ditzy to be G last night, despite his behaviour. That kinda puts him and posters similar to him off the spot semi-automatically. Judging on factors that are outside the game. I dont want the same happening when the D he knew about was whacked last night.
Yeah, you do make some sense Osman. As usual.
But why would I now "protect" Melo? If it was up to me, he would have been lynched yesterday, as proven by my vote. Alas, it didn't happen & now I can't shake the feeling that it's all a bit obvious. Precisely of all that's become clear in the meantime.
But, I have to admit, it won't take a lot to convince me to vote for Melo again
But why would I now "protect" Melo? If it was up to me, he would have been lynched yesterday, as proven by my vote. Alas, it didn't happen & now I can't shake the feeling that it's all a bit obvious. Precisely of all that's become clear in the meantime.
But, I have to admit, it won't take a lot to convince me to vote for Melo again
But the thing is Buck, you are mainly just saying few platitudes and vague thoughts (almost playing it TOO safe), not clarifying your actual thoughts of him. What do you think of that he inflitrated the confidence of the detective without any proof of his identity, and then that same day/night, the detective gets whacked? Whats the odss of the detective getting offed randomly out of us all? Treq was barely active and saying much. Only Melo and TWW knew his role. Saying Melo is too obvious to be G is a copout, especially after such a thing.
And you voting for Melo doesnt mean much considering it didnt seem that likely he was getting lynched yesterday (can be used as a dummy vote for a G, to cover his ass if Melo gets lynched another day "see I voted for him), first same votes as Motorhead, then early on the day it got clear most of us were going for no lynch, no one was willing to put in the effort to weed out suspects, so they just voted no lynch. We can mainly read peeps behaviour through how they think in posts, or way more difficult, in just votes, which most are doing. I'm pretty sure the few who voted for no lynch have few Gs in them, atleast 1 one of them is for sure.
And you voting for Melo doesnt mean much considering it didnt seem that likely he was getting lynched yesterday (can be used as a dummy vote for a G, to cover his ass if Melo gets lynched another day "see I voted for him), first same votes as Motorhead, then early on the day it got clear most of us were going for no lynch, no one was willing to put in the effort to weed out suspects, so they just voted no lynch. We can mainly read peeps behaviour through how they think in posts, or way more difficult, in just votes, which most are doing. I'm pretty sure the few who voted for no lynch have few Gs in them, atleast 1 one of them is for sure.
Honestly, I think that was well done of him & also incredibly stupid of Treq. The fact that Treq was whacked does make it very weird, but why would Melo brag so much about knowing his role, if that gives away his own identity?
Again, you (not you, Osman) can't possibly be that clueless.
Here's the thing though. Before the forum went offline, there was still a pretty decent chance that Melo would end up being lynched. I was definitely not the only one voting for him.
Apparently, the forum was back online sometime yesterday, but I myself was not around yesterday. So protecting Melo by changing my vote if necessary was not an option...
And no, "..." doesn't mean I'm a G
Again, you (not you, Osman
) can't possibly be that clueless.Here's the thing though. Before the forum went offline, there was still a pretty decent chance that Melo would end up being lynched. I was definitely not the only one voting for him.
Apparently, the forum was back online sometime yesterday, but I myself was not around yesterday. So protecting Melo by changing my vote if necessary was not an option...
And no, "..." doesn't mean I'm a G
That is possible for sure Red, random shit like that I seen happen. But I dont see why Treq would randomly chosen as a civilian to get taken out, he was anonymous and seemed like a rookie who followed whatever everyone else was doing (meaning can be played by Gs indirectly). That mainly makes that scenario bit harder to consider for me. Quite bit more possible that a random new guy who didnt post much like Treq, would get offed because he was found out to be the D.
