Quick intakes from Italia vs Frane match.
It was always going to be cagey affair with both teams having too much to loose by loosing the match, and the game eventually ended predictable 0-0 draw.
But worrying for Azzurri, I cant but admit France looks likely superior squad at this stage. In 2000-2002, I personally think Italia was stronger of the two, despite popular conception that France was better, but the tide has turn, and this Italian teams in a mid-way between transition. I still believe Inzaghi and Ale can give many more to the Azzurri, but as a pair they are terrible. If both of them couldnt get it done all those years, they are not going to do it now. Without Totti, I think Italia are missing fantasista who can unlock defence with a moment of magic. So I dont know what hit Donadoni, but why he did not call up most talented Italian in Rosina, only god knows why. With likes of Escude, L. Diarra, and Abidal, and Thuram at the back, Rosina could have made them shit in their pants with direct dribbling and ligthening quick feet. Abidal looks far better than I initially thought, and Thuram, what player even at his age. I would take him in a heart beat in current Juve set-up.
Defence looked great for Italia, and another golden oldie, Cannavaro was simply captain immense. Henry who?:eyebrows: It seems when it comes to club mathes Henry owns Canna, vice verse in International stage. Barzagli did no harm for his reputation. I dont know why he gets so smuch stick. Playing with likes of Pisano, Cassani, Fontana, and Guana its like asking Gigi to save all the shots in the match. As a member of quality team, Barzagli is more than good enough. I am not too sure abou his price, but quality is there. And in midfield, Pirlo was pick of the bunch. Alongside Ribery, Thuram, and Canna, Pirlo was the star of the show. He would have been voted as my MOM, had he made more of set-pieces. Its an irony that he recognized the importance of deadball prior to the match, only to send many of those even I could have done better. But his distribution in the match was superb, and even carrying the ball to some extent.
As for France, Ribery looks like the part, and its probably debatable as for who is actually France best player ATM. Ribery has superb technique, which combined with his speed, makes him deadly at counter-attacks. He can also carry the ball up the field with great efficiency, and one thing I like about him is that he doesnt seem to matter which defender he is facing. Big game player no doubt. Bayern got themselves a real bargain, which is pity, because one may ask why we were investing similar some on Tiago Mendes, when Ribery is probably many times the player of superior quality.
And good luck to Scotland. I still feel Italia and France will go through, but they have done their nation will proud. If they qualify after playing 6 games against Italia, France and Ukraine, they may not be the best team in the world, but you cant do that based on luck alone. It shows the game is more than just being good with a ball, physically quick and strong. Good work by their manager of player, something which Azzurri could learn. Despite their desire in the match, it is blatantly clear Donadoni doesnt have the nous of Lippi when it comes down to managing. Di Natale is good player, but nowhere near the calibre of players he left behind. And why Lucarelli came on I don't know. Much maligned Gilardino is still player of highest quaity, with goal record to prove his case. He could have been useful against France IMO. I feel pitty for Donadoni since this Italian team is in a period of transition, but given the sheer quality in the youth set-up, and some of the decisions of old guards, he could have shaken the team a bit, which he hasnt, and he may find that costly mistake.