Non-Juve transfer news (30 Viewers)

mondo1

Senior Member
May 14, 2006
11,855
Their audacity is out of this world.

They want to offload their trash, but wants the buyers to pay crazy overprice at the same time.

First they wanted us to buy him outright or with an obligation, glad we didn't fall for it. Even if the loan is too high.
Höness forced Eberl to do such a retarded move. Now the coast is even higher than signing someone lol


Gesendet von iPhone mit Tapatalk
 

Hist

Founder of Hism
Jan 18, 2009
11,665
  • Hist

    Hist

How these players are going for those crazy prices while we sell Chiesa for 15 (the freaking loan fee for Jackson) and can’t offload vlahovic for any price is insane.

Surely there must be some Accounting Maneuvers happening between these clubs to inflate the player valuations on each others books.
 

Xperd

Allegrophobic Infidel
Jun 1, 2012
35,768
Their audacity is out of this world.

They want to offload their trash, but wants the buyers to pay crazy overprice at the same time.

First they wanted us to buy him outright or with an obligation, glad we didn't fall for it. Even if the loan is too high.
I really believe what Chelsea are doing is extremely suspicious

Not this particular deal per se but since Boehly has taken over, they've bought and sold hundreds of players for some insane prices.

It's become a very meticulous system with them. Not to mention giving players 7-8 year contracts. This is some highly sophisticated level of book cooking you'll see and its very unlikely they'll ever get punished. They play in the most televised league and don't have a broken system like Italy who used transfermarkt valuations to punish JJ.

If City got away with 115 charges, nothing's happening to them either.

Football is an extremely corrupt sport. It's just that there are teams/leagues who are too powerful and know how to get away with things.
 

JuveJay

Senior Signor
Moderator
Mar 6, 2007
75,814
15m loan doesn't mean anything if the purchase option is, say, 45m. Then it's just an extension for the payment. But 15+80m is obviously not his value and suggests he won't be bought and Bayern just got a bit desperate for someone.
 
Aug 30, 2002
61,868
Bayern are doing this desperately because:

1.Muller/Coman/Sane left
2. Musiala out injured for long long time.
3. Couldn't get Woltemade.


Meaning their approach of replacing/resting Kane with wingers/AMs wont work. There's just kids on the bench for attack now.

So its a MUST for Kane to have a direct replacement. So they can be extorted with the loan fee for sure, especially younger striker in EPL who scores 12-15 goals who will be able to be sold for 40-50m in this current inflated market (Newcastle/Notts/Brentford etc would easily).



The buy option is obviously just a precaution in case he blows up there. It won't be used at all.


He will go back to chelsea or they will renegotiate.
 
May 14, 2006
11,855
Vlahovic earns €12M net. Jackson probably earns a 3rd of that.
I read he’s on 15 mil but no clue if net or gross.
But 15+15 is 30 mil for one year. For Vlahovic they needed what 20 mil gross and 5-7 mil amortization for the transfer fee… plus you get the better player


Gesendet von iPhone mit Tapatalk
 

Xperd

Allegrophobic Infidel
Jun 1, 2012
35,768
I read he’s on 15 mil but no clue if net or gross.
But 15+15 is 30 mil for one year. For Vlahovic they needed what 20 mil gross and 5-7 mil amortization for the transfer fee… plus you get the better player


Gesendet von iPhone mit Tapatalk
Better player is debatable. You have to factor in not just wages but duration of contract as well when buying Vlahovic. It's a hefty cost for someone who contributes very little and is a huge gamble.

Jackson for 1 year with lower wages for a club like Bayern is a lesser risk in comparison. If he turns out great, they'd be more than happy to break the bank for him.
 
May 14, 2006
11,855
Better player is debatable. You have to factor in not just wages but duration of contract as well when buying Vlahovic. It's a hefty cost for someone who contributes very little and is a huge gamble.

Jackson for 1 year with lower wages for a club like Bayern is a lesser risk in comparison. If he turns out great, they'd be more than happy to break the bank for him.
I know we bitch a lot about Vlahovic but he’s easily score 25 goals in the Bundesliga for Bayern. Jackson failed to impress too and I’m sure he’d do worser here than Vlahovic did


Gesendet von iPhone mit Tapatalk
 
Aug 27, 2010
11,077
I read he’s on 15 mil but no clue if net or gross.
But 15+15 is 30 mil for one year. For Vlahovic they needed what 20 mil gross and 5-7 mil amortization for the transfer fee… plus you get the better player


Gesendet von iPhone mit Tapatalk
According to capology Jackson is on 6m gross.
Unfortunateley its already happening that even clubs like Bayern have to hunt on scraps of PL sometimes. The financial gap is getting bigger and bigger by each year.
 

Xperd

Allegrophobic Infidel
Jun 1, 2012
35,768
According to capology Jackson is on 6m gross.
Unfortunateley its already happening that even clubs like Bayern have to hunt on scraps of PL sometimes. The financial gap is getting bigger and bigger by each year.
I don't understand why they bought Luis Diaz for 80M. Thats something JJ would do. That easily funds their pursuit of Isak.

- - - Updated - - -


Oil club level madness

Pool are gonna dominate PL
 
Last edited:

mondo1

Senior Member
May 14, 2006
11,855
According to capology Jackson is on 6m gross.
Unfortunateley its already happening that even clubs like Bayern have to hunt on scraps of PL sometimes. The financial gap is getting bigger and bigger by each year.
Yeah I checked it’s 4 mil net and around 7-8 gross. Don’t know why they said 15 but well they still report woltemade for 85-90 mil


Gesendet von iPhone mit Tapatalk
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 3, Guests: 27)