Nike kits Shown (Part II) (7 Viewers)

Layce Erayce

Senior Member
Aug 11, 2002
9,116
#81
++ [ originally posted by Majed ] ++


what battle?! :confused:
and who the hell do you think you are telling us "enough of that" or what we should talk about.

i never knew you could get so rude Hydde. if you dont like our posts, nobody forced you to read it.our posts are harmless and we have freedom of speach.
majed it was a suggestion not an order or a command. i dont think he was rude or questioning your freedom of speech.
 

Buy on AliExpress.com

Layce Erayce

Senior Member
Aug 11, 2002
9,116
#82
++ [ originally posted by Ale10 ] ++
The first time I saw it i thought the same. Trust me it'll grow on you, plus that isnt the final version. Itll look muc better with the sponsor and shield on.
They usually look worse with all the sponsor logos although in some cases they actually contribute to the overall 'feel' of the shirt.

What annoys me is that we change our sponsors so often- we never get used to the sponsors on our shirt....annoying.
 

baggio

Senior Member
Jun 3, 2003
19,250
#83
There's no harm in a little argument as long as it doesn't get personal here's my 2 cents about this matter:

I also believe that they aren't the pioneers and i understand your feeling that they dont feel like a football maker. your argument that nike is in it now for the money and not the football makes sense, but you have to remember that Adidas grew as a company because they realized that they can make so much money as well. it's all about business. so i dont really see the difference now (if adidas still made shoes for fun, then i'd say that i'd go for adidas). Adidas are also trying to compete in the NFL products. Reebok are also trying with NBA. it's all business.

About nike being a US biased company. i dont think that biased is the proper word becasuse their intention is just business. they have a bigger and they are more settled in the NFL and NBA that it makes sense for them to have a bigger market there. (they've been making risks for many years in getting in to football, but they know that once they're sttled in Europe, they will make so much. That's why i think their football development headquarters is in italy now.

you say that "what they think works for them is all that matters."
it's business. every company in the world looks for it's own benifit. but this is not the reason why they really sucked a long time ago. the reason is that they were new to footbal, they had no experience and they thought they could apply NFL or NBA rules of marketing with football (they were very niave). it's not really about how much they care about football, it's more about their experience in the business.
ESPN also thinks the same. they want to make money, so they are taking big risks in buying righst for europeans soccer games. they might not get enough viewers to match the price they paid for it. that's why they dont want to buy too much of it. so they're going easy into it and they're just waiting for the demand for soccer in the US to increase.

but please keep in mind that i still sgree adidas is better, and i also hated how nike thought they could get away with their older "abyssmal" kits.

:)

I'm sure they are, but if you see their designs, they arent oblivious to what works with respect to those sports as i thought Nike to be. As you might see in some current reebok and adidas designs in us sports. Theyre doing what the us market wud identify with. But i dont think we cud say the same abt nike as far as football goes. (but that is only until now, theyre a lot better than what they used to be).

I see absolutely no harm, if they want to work towards pipping adidas from the top. Yes, absolutely i agree, being a us company, its only right, they focus on sports such as the NFL and NBA. But the thing is, if they want to make money and be in europe, then they shud adapt a similar attitude. Not believe that, becoz football will make them money and the undisputed #1, that shdunt be the only reason they shud be in it.i mean earlier they seemed to be in it, just for the sake of it, just becoz it was football, just becoz it wud get them noticed as a major sponsor in the worlds favourite sport...they shud go all out and work towards it with a little more focus and purpose. . Which is why signing teams like man u and juve now seems like a good step.It will help them develop if theyre really serious abt it.


I think calling them naive, wud do justice to their efforts at that point of time. But they surely were big enuff even when they entered football, they just seemed to have too much attitude i think. Blving its not a US sport, so it cant really be that important, so anything goes here. As for ESPN, well i dont think the two situations can really be compared, but i do blv espn is doing a decent job ard the world. Very commendable. Theyve figured out their stratergies and marketing abilities of the regions theyre cateing to, so theyre ok.

Yes im sure, most ppl are fond of tradition. And i too think very highly of adidas as far as football goes. I think they have some very neat and classy designs. As do KAPPA ;).


need any help ?! ;)
We'll go 50 - 50 on the bonus when i get promoted.:thumb: :LOL:[/QUOTE]
 

baggio

Senior Member
Jun 3, 2003
19,250
#84
++ [ originally posted by Guerillaurbano ] ++


majed it was a suggestion not an order or a command. i dont think he was rude or questioning your freedom of speech.
i agree with guerillaurbano, majed. :)
I dont think hydde was being rude.... hes just bored with our nike argument. :)
 
OP
Majed

Majed

Senior Member
Jul 17, 2002
9,630
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread Starter #85
    ++ [ originally posted by baggio ] ++


    i agree with guerillaurbano, majed. :)
    I dont think hydde was being rude.... hes just bored with our nike argument. :)
    his intentions may have been innocent, but i dont see how you can interpret "Enough of that" to mean something other than an order or command.

    nobody told him he has to read the argument. do you see me going into every form that i'm borred in and stating there that i'm borred and they should talk about something else!!? :rolleyes:

    of course not, because it's rude to use that "enough of that" phrase.
     
    Sep 28, 2002
    13,975
    #86
    ++ [ originally posted by Majed ] ++


    his intentions may have been innocent, but i dont see how you can interpret "Enough of that" to mean something other than an order or command.

    nobody told him he has to read the argument. do you see me going into every form that i'm borred in and stating there that i'm borred and they should talk about something else!!? :rolleyes:

    of course not, because it's rude to use that "enough of that" phrase.
    oh come on majed. hydde also has the right of free speech and he can whatever he wants if he doesn't like what others are saying.
     
    OP
    Majed

    Majed

    Senior Member
    Jul 17, 2002
    9,630
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread Starter #87
    ++ [ originally posted by Fliakis ] ++


    oh come on majed. hydde also has the right of free speech and he can whatever he wants if he doesn't like what others are saying.
    Shut up Fliakis!











    now, does that sound fine?! ;)
    just because it's his right to say what he wants, it doesn't mean it isn't rude!
    you get my point?!!

    i know it's your goddamn "right," but why am i not surprised that you guys would stick your noses into this and turn it into a group issue.
     

    baggio

    Senior Member
    Jun 3, 2003
    19,250
    #88
    ++ [ originally posted by Majed ] ++


    his intentions may have been innocent, but i dont see how you can interpret "Enough of that" to mean something other than an order or command.

    nobody told him he has to read the argument. do you see me going into every form that i'm borred in and stating there that i'm borred and they should talk about something else!!? :rolleyes:

    of course not, because it's rude to use that "enough of that" phrase.
    Take it easy, im sure his intentions were innocent. Not meaning to command us, "enough of that" was just said, implementing that we end the topic....thats all. Dude like u said, every1 here is free to expresss themselves, he just meant that he's seen enuff of it.Im sure when he said "enough of that", more than a command, he just meant, that he himself has had enuff of it. Chill, dont let it get to u.
     

    baggio

    Senior Member
    Jun 3, 2003
    19,250
    #89
    ++ [ originally posted by Fliakis ] ++


    oh come on majed. hydde also has the right of free speech and he can whatever he wants if he doesn't like what others are saying.
    Filakis, im sure, there was a better way of saying what u just said. Cmon guys, calm down.
     

    Hydde

    Minimiliano Tristelli
    Mar 6, 2003
    38,985
    #91
    ++ [ originally posted by Majed ] ++


    what battle?! :confused:
    and who the hell do you think you are telling us "enough of that" or what we should talk about.

    i never knew you could get so rude Hydde. if you dont like our posts, nobody forced you to read it.our posts are harmless and we have freedom of speach.
    Hey wassup!!! i was not talking rude!.

    Hey but you two already discussed that in the other thread!.

    I like your post guys! but lets talk about the jersey!!!!!!!!!.

    And like the other members said, you was the only one that taked the "enough of that", like a command!!.

    It was clear that i was suggesting to talk about the juve shirt itself.

    You see maj!! you are getting mad again!.
     

    Wings

    Banter era connoiseur
    Contributor
    Jul 15, 2002
    21,545
    #92
    Take it easy fellas ....
    Thin stripes, big white patch, cagey collar .... I just to wait and see it on the players.
     

    Slagathor

    Bedpan racing champion
    Jul 25, 2001
    22,708
    #93
    For crying out loud, this thread is turning into a dejà-vu!

    I'm holding my hand on the closing button here - one more word about freedom of speech or whatever and I hit it.

    This thread is about the Nike kit, please try and stay on-topic.
     

    Vinman

    2013 Prediction Cup Champ
    Jul 16, 2002
    11,482
    #95
    The fact that we're locked into 12 years of prison... I mean contract , by Nike

    To think that our uniforms will be the same style as the US National Team.....How disappointing
     

    baggio

    Senior Member
    Jun 3, 2003
    19,250
    #98
    ++ [ originally posted by Alex ] ++
    What's with you people and the kits that stirs such strong emotions? :confused:
    I think the reason we juventini are so fashion conscious is because, Juve have been a team that have probably had the best jerseys in club football in the years gone by. Kappa seemed to be doing a brilliant job. Our jackets made the team look like the MAFIA:D. THEY WERE JUST SOO DAMN CLASSY!
    I think its justt that we sub consciously feel bad, coz its going to be one sponsor for a really long period of time. i.e 12 years.
    So its feeling like we're stuck as far as thast concerned. And sometimes, where long contracts are concerned, sponsors may keep the same jersey for 2 seasons running.......and how we dont want that.:down:
     

    Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 7)