Nick Against the World (67 Viewers)

Apr 12, 2004
77,165
Vinman said:
France became a better team instantly when Zidane and company came back (they still have the skill and prowess to be considered for second)

S&M I would put right behind Australia, if not tied with them

France might not even be top 5 right now, Zidane is not half as good as he was.

Thuram is old, Gallas is old, Vieira is sucking right now, their team is past its best, except for Henry who tapping into a gold rush of form.
 

Geof

Senior Member
May 14, 2004
6,740
Vinman said:
France became a better team instantly when Zidane and company came back (they still have the skill and prowess to be considered for second)

S&M I would put right behind Australia, if not tied with them
I'd put France at 5th place or something.

They got the players, no question, but they didn't really convince me so far.
Of course they got their fair chance for the WC. Remember '98, theysucked big time and almost fired Aimé Jacquet just before the WC...
 

swag

L'autista
Administrator
Sep 23, 2003
84,784
I don't know. USA at #5 doesn't seem so ridiculous when you compare them to Spain at #6 (perennial chokers/underachievers) and Mexico at #7 (ditto). But I would hardly put them ahead of England and Italy, for instance. Or Spain and Mexico ahead of them for that matter.
 

Bjerknes

"Top Economist"
Mar 16, 2004
116,166
Here is what the ranking SHOULD look like:

1. Brazil
2. Argentina
3. Italy
4. England
5. Holland
6. Czech Republic
7. France
8. Spain
9. Germany
10. Portugal
11. USA
12. Serbia and Montenegro
13. Sweden
14. Ukraine
 

Geof

Senior Member
May 14, 2004
6,740
Andy said:
Here is what the ranking SHOULD look like:

1. Brazil
2. Argentina
3. Italy
4. England
5. Holland
6. Czech Republic
7. France
8. Spain
9. Germany
10. Portugal
11. USA
12. Serbia and Montenegro
13. Sweden
14. Ukraine
that's more like it. but who's number 15?


ßömßärdiër said:
Similies?

You are like a Belgian waffle.

Something like that?

:D
Well the Waffle you refer to is what we call the Brussels Waffle. There's also the Liege Waffle which is quite different:

Wikipedia said:
# The Belgian waffle (also referred to as the "Brussels waffle") often refers to a waffle that is thicker, lighter, crispier and has larger partitions than the traditional waffle. They are often served as a breakfast, with the same topping choices as a traditional waffle. More often than the traditional waffle however, they are served with fruits, whipped cream or ice cream, sometimes served as a dessert. While the thickness is the most commonly accepted difference between the Belgian waffle and the traditional waffle, the use of yeast and beaten egg whites in most Belgian waffle recipes, as opposed to baking powder in the traditional waffle recipe, gives them a lighter and crispier texture.
# The Liège waffle (from the city of Liège, eastern Belgium) is a waffle usually bought and eaten warm on the street. They are usually freshly made in small street side shop, but it is also possible to buy them in supermarkets. They are smaller, sweeter and denser than "Belgian waffles" and have a carmelized sugar coating on the outside, giving it a lightly sweet flavor. Most are served plain, but some are vanilla or cinnamon flavoured, and can be served with toppings like fruits, creams, and chocolate. The Liège waffle was invented by a cook of the prince-bishop of Liège in the 18th century.
 

Enron

Tickle Me
Moderator
Oct 11, 2005
75,665
Andy said:
Here is what the ranking SHOULD look like:

1. Brazil
2. Argentina
3. Italy
4. England
5. Holland
6. Czech Republic
7. France
8. Spain
9. Germany
10. Portugal
11. USA
12. Serbia and Montenegro
13. Sweden
14. Ukraine
I think USA should be top ten, especially after Klose learns the pain the Oguchi Onyewu brings.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 65)