I was not calling you an idiot, only joking. Both Milan and Inter have an equal chance of moving through, and whoever plays better on their designated away match will probably go through.
Buy on AliExpress.com
Nick Against the World (62 Viewers)
- Thread starter IncuboRossonero
- Start date
Buy on AliExpress.com
Roma 0 Milan 2
Did anyone think it would be any different ???
I was hoping that Roma could force a draw, but that was just wishful thinking.
Totti once again doesnt show up for the big game, and all he has to show for it is a silly red card.
Milan have found their stride, and arent looking back. They will win the scudetto this season.
Btw- I think the FIGC should ban the use of flares at the stadiums. Not only are they dangerous, but I couldnt see a damn thing at the beginning of the halves, for about 8-10 minutes.
I might as well have been watching a snow-storm.....
Did anyone think it would be any different ???
I was hoping that Roma could force a draw, but that was just wishful thinking.
Totti once again doesnt show up for the big game, and all he has to show for it is a silly red card.
Milan have found their stride, and arent looking back. They will win the scudetto this season.
Btw- I think the FIGC should ban the use of flares at the stadiums. Not only are they dangerous, but I couldnt see a damn thing at the beginning of the halves, for about 8-10 minutes.
I might as well have been watching a snow-storm.....
It was both Vinman, flares and weather.
With the current pace that Milan are in it seems that they are heading for the Scudetto, but look at their last 5 games:
http://www.juventuz.com/forum/showthread.php?s=&threadid=10042
With the current pace that Milan are in it seems that they are heading for the Scudetto, but look at their last 5 games:
http://www.juventuz.com/forum/showthread.php?s=&threadid=10042
Cafu should have been sent off for that tackle on Cufre; it was absolutely horrible. Did you guys see the wound from the tackle? It was pretty nasty.
If Cafu would have been sent off for that Roma would have had a turn of good fortune. Just goes to show that Juventus are not the only club getting favorable calls or non-calls.
Totti is just a disgrace to football really. Such a good player who gets caught up in the nonsense and has to show that he's some sort of thug. Stupid player really.
If Cafu would have been sent off for that Roma would have had a turn of good fortune. Just goes to show that Juventus are not the only club getting favorable calls or non-calls.
Totti is just a disgrace to football really. Such a good player who gets caught up in the nonsense and has to show that he's some sort of thug. Stupid player really.
OP
++ [ originally posted by Andy ] ++
Cafu should have been sent off for that tackle on Cufre; it was absolutely horrible. Did you guys see the wound from the tackle? It was pretty nasty.
If Cafu would have been sent off for that Roma would have had a turn of good fortune. Just goes to show that Juventus are not the only club getting favorable calls or non-calls.
Cafu should have been sent off for that tackle on Cufre; it was absolutely horrible. Did you guys see the wound from the tackle? It was pretty nasty.
If Cafu would have been sent off for that Roma would have had a turn of good fortune. Just goes to show that Juventus are not the only club getting favorable calls or non-calls.
Yet how you can compare that to a BALL going IN THE NET and the Ref waving NO GOAL is beyond me. This is saying IF he was sent OFF ..IF ROMA WOULD HAVE SCORED, etc.
I'm sure you can see the difference.
I disagree..or I agree...whatever
...well it has been a terrible year for Totti the leader and the character I think his problem is that he wants to stay at Rome and succeed on an international level and realizes he is in his prime. He must decide what he wants to be...the LOYAL player who never leaves but will surely not win any international cups any time soon or take his chance somewhere else where they may or may not put up with his bullsh*t.
Why yes of course I can see the difference, however what Cafu did on that tackle was terrible. That was a two-footed challenge in which Cafu went metal-studs up on Cufre, catching him below the knee. Now tell me what is worse; a player recieving a season-ending injury from a nasty tackle or a goal being disallowed because of a handball. Surely you can see the dfference there. Cafu should have been "expulsione-d" and that could have changed Milan's night for the worse.
I'm not biacthing about the calls because we get our fair share of those as well. I just wanted to make a point to all the Juventus detractors that indeed we're not the only club getting all the calls or non-calls.
Indeed, if Gattuso had made that tackle he would have been off. What else does Cafu have to do to get a red? Resort to spitting his chewing gum at Cufre? Equal standards.
I just think if Totti wouldn't be such a douche on the pitch he would be a much better player. Furthermore all of his fellow Romanisti, especially the supporters, follow his lead and that is certainly not very good. I think his actions over the past couple years have hurt Roma more than help their cause, turning the club into a circus that, when the big matches come up, does anything but play football.
I'm not biacthing about the calls because we get our fair share of those as well. I just wanted to make a point to all the Juventus detractors that indeed we're not the only club getting all the calls or non-calls.
Indeed, if Gattuso had made that tackle he would have been off. What else does Cafu have to do to get a red? Resort to spitting his chewing gum at Cufre? Equal standards.
I just think if Totti wouldn't be such a douche on the pitch he would be a much better player. Furthermore all of his fellow Romanisti, especially the supporters, follow his lead and that is certainly not very good. I think his actions over the past couple years have hurt Roma more than help their cause, turning the club into a circus that, when the big matches come up, does anything but play football.
OP
What is worse? CALL WISE? Its hard to UNDERSTAND how a linesman who has one job : WATCH THE BALL says it never went in the net.
The tackle? You are playing games Andy..obviously a player being hurt is worse in the scheme of things but we are talking about blatant calls here...
players like Materazzi, Zebina and Montero have gotten away with playing rough week after week. Its not surprise that an official is hesitant to make a call on a Cannavaro, Nesta or Maldini. I didn't say it was a good call..it was a RED NO DOUBT.
However, it is much more understandable calling it yellow than calling a GOAL a NO-GOAL.
That is my point.
More over, the key word is COULD HAVE...the other calls in question (Cannavaro's offside goal...the NO PK call against Rome..no NO GOAL AGAINST CHIEVO) did not have any IFS...the conclusion would have been simple: JUVE WOULD NOT HAVE GOTTEN THEIR POINTS.
However, since you are on this game....remember that Cafu took no part in either of the two last goals....
juve does not get calls in their favor...they get GOALS in their favor...
The tackle? You are playing games Andy..obviously a player being hurt is worse in the scheme of things but we are talking about blatant calls here...
players like Materazzi, Zebina and Montero have gotten away with playing rough week after week. Its not surprise that an official is hesitant to make a call on a Cannavaro, Nesta or Maldini. I didn't say it was a good call..it was a RED NO DOUBT.
However, it is much more understandable calling it yellow than calling a GOAL a NO-GOAL.
That is my point.
More over, the key word is COULD HAVE...the other calls in question (Cannavaro's offside goal...the NO PK call against Rome..no NO GOAL AGAINST CHIEVO) did not have any IFS...the conclusion would have been simple: JUVE WOULD NOT HAVE GOTTEN THEIR POINTS.
However, since you are on this game....remember that Cafu took no part in either of the two last goals....
juve does not get calls in their favor...they get GOALS in their favor...
OP
That said, the BOYS surprised me today..I thought a tie was looming at L'Olimpico tonight...
BUT..NOT AN INCH GOBBI'S....
you have to work for your supposed "title"
p.s. think back to all the "MILAN IS NOTHING WITHOUT SHEVA" theorists and the AHAHAH MILAN SIGNED CRESPO posters back in August :cheesy:
BUT..NOT AN INCH GOBBI'S....
you have to work for your supposed "title"
p.s. think back to all the "MILAN IS NOTHING WITHOUT SHEVA" theorists and the AHAHAH MILAN SIGNED CRESPO posters back in August :cheesy:
OP
++ [ originally posted by Zlatan ] ++
Milan didnt permanently sign Crespo, they loaned him... a pity, you rely on other club's players do your work...
Milan didnt permanently sign Crespo, they loaned him... a pity, you rely on other club's players do your work...
So then Nedved who came from another club is technically also another club's player...difference is they purchased him?
So if Crespo is purchased this summer by Milan (as it looks to be) his real season will only count NEXT YEAR?
Yeah makes a lot of damn sense there Zlatty.
More over, in case you didn't notice, Crespo barely played at Chelsea and everyone called him finished last season. In addition, everyone called Ancelotti a fool for having Milan sign Crespo rather than a young defender. Guess that is why he is where he is and everyone else is criticizing from the outside.
Irrelevant. Its the same thing as signing a player to one-two years to plug in the weak points of the team: Pancaro, Cafu, Zebina, etc. Basically the fact that the TEAM does not own the rights to him doesn't make you sleep at night (so to speak) but if they straight out owned him then it puts him on a different level?
Irrelevant because usually if they succeed in their 'loan' year the team will do MUCH to buy him.
COME ON ZLATTY.