But why is one useless RIP better than another? It does nothing, right? And the only thing we really care about is things that affect us, so all the Western tourists in Thailand and stuff when the tsunami occurred. And yes, you can't differentiate between the tourists and the locals in good faith, especially because there were so many tourists and locals who helped each other and all that. But otherwise would there be such an uproar? If it wasn't our favorite holiday destination? What about Bali, lots of Western (well, Australian, but they qualify as one of us) tourists there too.
I agree that this psychology of sympathy is pretty interesting, because people don't know how to react. Heck, when I see these things I don't know what I should be doing myself. If someone shoots themselves isn't that sad? I mean the circumstances that must have led them to do this can't be happy can they? They must either have gone through a rough time or had mental health issues, neither of which are particularly cheerful. So what is wrong with sympathizing with that? Isn't that maybe something we relate to more easily than a natural disaster we could do nothing about?
Fuck no, Martin. You're just avoiding the issue here, plus contradicting yourself. You say we shouldn't mourn people for different issues but then sympathize who blow people's brains out. I mean, this should be a clear cut issue.
So who wrote it, where was he from? If he was European I'm fairly confident he was comparing you with Europe, and maybe a couple of other countries like Japan etc that we feel have a similar standard of living. In other words "our world". Not with Myanmar, in fact people who would argue the US is less civilized than Myanmar probably don't exist, because they don't know what Myanmar is.
And talk about "civil" - over here in the US, we actually have our meteorological data publicly available. Let me ask you, Martin. How many powerful hurricanes or tornadoes does Europe experience per year compared to the USA? Sure, you lot have powerful low pressure windstorms that smash in from the North Sea, but you do not have Category 4 hurricanes smashing into your coastlines on a monthly basis in the peak season. Absolutely not. The highest you've ever encountered is something comparable to a Cat 2 hurricane, and that happened a couple times I believe.
So therefore, even if the author was from Europe, he has no right to compare the civility seen after Katrina in the South to anything seen in Europe because the latter has never had to deal with a storm THAT POWERFUL. Until a Cat 4 storm slams into one of Europe's low lying cities, he has no argument.
I don't mean to sound like I'm taking this personal, and you know that I am a spoken critic of my own nation. But this criticism is fucking off the richter scale, which reeks of illogic and meteorological misunderstanding. If you want to talk about the engineering that goes into protecting cities, such as seen in Holland, that's certainly another matter.
