Mutu for me. I dislike the finisher type of striker that is of Di Vaio's type. On the hand it is always exciting to watch a striker of Mutu's calibre not only because the work rate he puts in is awesome and the constant threat that he poses but the fact that he can also give fantastic assists. It's not my idea of fun to watch a striker who is absent for 85 minutes & then scores the winner.
whats up i cant vote...its like ur session is i dont know what...
anywyas id say di viao i find him a better player than mutu..
and besides do you think mutu will have any patience whatsoever is he was on the sub most of the time...
++ [ originally posted by -CSD- ] ++
yeah, but the Di Vaio is the kinda guy that will score even if he's off-form (most of the time)
Mutu on the other hand, if he's off form, he's useless
yeah, and what if he became like Di Vaio last season.
i think Diva didnt perform well becoz he needed to adapt to a whole new playin style. and Mutu woulda suffered too IMO
Deej Mutu is more creative than DV hence he would adapt faster. Mutu tends to get deep & collect the ball & do something with it while DV will just wait, wait, wait ..... until the ball gets to him.
i wouldn't say Mutu's not Juve caliber. Scoring 18 goals (most of them pretty brilliant) in Serie A has gotta be some indication of a player's quality.
as for juve need a creative player we already have del piero for that, i think di viao was the best choice, moggi knows what hes doing when it comes to buyin his players...and look at di viao now! he has scored so much for juve!
it dosent matter what he didlast season di viao all that matter is he is doin amazing now! forza di viao
++ [ originally posted by Zizou ] ++
They're both different players. I would have loved to have both of them in our team. Imagine: DP, Trez, Miccoli, DV and Mutu (instead of Zala).