'Murica! (193 Viewers)

swag

L'autista
Administrator
Sep 23, 2003
84,779
Wasent Bin Laden caught under Obama's reign, after a terrorist leaked vital information when beeing waterboarded ?
I thought that was long refuted. The CIA refuted it, even though the Senate intelligence committee questioned the CIA's statement.

Do you know that there haven't been a single terrorist attack in North Korea in decades?
Gotta have our model societies, yo.
 

Zacheryah

Senior Member
Aug 29, 2010
42,251
Do you know that there haven't been a single terrorist attack in North Korea in decades?
:D
I thought that was long refuted. The CIA refuted it, even though the Senate intelligence committee questioned the CIA's statement.



Gotta have our model societies, yo.
certainly the USA couldnt have killed its number one enemy by getting information from torture, especialy under a democrat who are less "acta exitus probat"
 

DAiDEViL

Senior Member
Feb 21, 2015
64,704
Are Answers given under torture reliable? I highly doubt it.

One of the interesting features of the torture debate is that many in the military and intelligence communities seem decidedly unconvinced about the effectiveness of torture. Ali Soufan, a former FBI special agent with considerable experience interrogating al-Qaeda operatives, pointed out in Time that:

"When they are in pain, people will say anything to get the pain to stop. Most of the time, they will lie, make up anything to make you stop hurting them. That means the information you're getting is useless."

He isn't alone in this assessment – a number of former intelligence people have expressed similar views, and his words are echoed by the US Army Training Manual's section on interrogation, which suggests that:

"…the use of force is a poor technique, as it yields unreliable results, may damage subsequent collection efforts, and can induce the source to say whatever he thinks the interrogator wants to hear."

...Suppose I start beating you around the head, demanding that you tell me that Justin Bieber is in fact a supremely talented artist. Eventually, although it may take several days of torture to get there, you'll tell me what I want to hear, but that doesn't make it true.

The second major problem is that human memory just isn't reliable. Take a bunch of witnesses from any major news event: a bombing, 9/11, a car crash, wherever. The more people you interview, the more different stories you'll get, because our recall of past events isn't always very accurate. On top of that, there is a vast body of scientific literature telling us that one way to make a person's memory even less reliable is to deprive them of sleep, or put them under great stress, or otherwise confuse them. You know, like you do with torture
https://www.theguardian.com/science/the-lay-scientist/2010/nov/04/2
 

Zacheryah

Senior Member
Aug 29, 2010
42,251
The reason why waterboarding is effective, is because its not pain related. there is no such thing as fear of the pain.


Its the effect you are drowning, feeling of actually going to die.



They'll get bs info if the terrorist indeed knows little. But someone who does, will speak.



If you capture a guy you know has info, he will give it up at some point.
 

Enron

Tickle Me
Moderator
Oct 11, 2005
75,664
The reason why waterboarding is effective, is because its not pain related. there is no such thing as fear of the pain.


Its the effect you are drowning, feeling of actually going to die.



They'll get bs info if the terrorist indeed knows little. But someone who does, will speak.



If you capture a guy you know has info, he will give it up at some point.
Have you been water boarded?
 

Enron

Tickle Me
Moderator
Oct 11, 2005
75,664
Just in:

Trump wants to charge 20% tariff on imported goods from Mexico to pay for the wall.

Not sure if he can actually do that. Guess we will see.
 

Seven

In bocca al lupo, Fabio.
Jun 25, 2003
39,343
The reason why waterboarding is effective, is because its not pain related. there is no such thing as fear of the pain.


Its the effect you are drowning, feeling of actually going to die.



They'll get bs info if the terrorist indeed knows little. But someone who does, will speak.



If you capture a guy you know has info, he will give it up at some point.
Sorry, but that makes no sense.
 

Seven

In bocca al lupo, Fabio.
Jun 25, 2003
39,343
Just in:

Trump wants to charge 20% tariff on imported goods from Mexico to pay for the wall.

Not sure if he can actually do that. Guess we will see.
That means Americans are paying for the wall. Mexicans don't even indirectly pay for it in that scenario.
 

Seven

In bocca al lupo, Fabio.
Jun 25, 2003
39,343
So americans buying from mexico pay for the wall.


Is there another, say alternative ( :D ), way of looking at it, cause i dont see it
Nope, there isn't. But there is also no other way. If you build a wall, you have to pay for the wall. And it will cost billions.

No idea why this got him votes.
 

DAiDEViL

Senior Member
Feb 21, 2015
64,704
Its absolutely amazing how you managed to read it so wrong tbh. Ill +rep for that
How did i read it wrong? Is there an alternative way of reading it?

You said "The reason why waterboarding is effective, is because its not pain related. there is no such thing as fear of the pain.

Its the effect you are drowning, feeling of actually going to die."
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 15, Guests: 154)