'Murica! (408 Viewers)

[AFL_ITALIA]

Yeah oops Vermont

Of course Bernie was going to beat Trump, as I said, that's Bernie's neck of the woods BUT if you were to whip away all the repub candidates except Trump and Kasich, all those other people would have had to vote for someone, right? So you would see BOTH candidates numbers skyrocket if that was the case and Trump is actually quite close in that regard IMO.

- - - Updated - - -



We should see some more finally bow out. Time to narrow the field.

No that poll is for a general election, not just New Hampshire. But I could see it being a lot closer than that.

 

Buy on AliExpress.com

[Ronn]

We should see some more finally bow out. Time to narrow the field.

Bad news for GOP is except Carson and Fiorina all of the candidates got a piece of the pie. If Christie's money does not run out we'll still have 6 in the race

- - - Updated - - -

Vermont, not New Hampshire . Sanders is expected to beat Trump though, Clinton as well but by a smaller margin.
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/ep...s/general_election_trump_vs_sanders-5565.html

Those polls bear no meaning at all at this point. Those are only for the media

 

[Hust]

No that poll is for a general election, not just New Hampshire. But I could see it being a lot closer than that.

NH or Vermont?

Bad news for GOP is except Carson and Fiorina all of the candidates got a piece of the pie. If Christie's money does not run out we'll still have 6 in the race

Even if 1-2 bow out that would help the process. The debates are annoying with so many people.

 

[GordoDeCentral]

Yeah oops Vermont

Of course Bernie was going to beat Trump, as I said, that's Bernie's neck of the woods BUT if you were to whip away all the repub candidates except Trump and Kasich, all those other people would have had to vote for someone, right? So you would see BOTH candidates numbers skyrocket if that was the case and Trump is actually quite close in that regard IMO.

- - - Updated - - -



We should see some more finally bow out. Time to narrow the field.

That's a biv assumption, why would people vote Republican regardless with a character as polarizing as Trump

 

[Hust]

That's a biv assumption, why would people vote Republican regardless with a character as polarizing as Trump

Ask people in New Hampshire.

 

[AFL_ITALIA]

NH or Vermont?


Even if 1-2 bow out that would help the process. The debates are annoying with so many people.

You were talking about NH originally so I just went with that, but either way .

It makes me laugh when they verbally bitch slap each other, so there's some entertainment value at least.

 

[Hust]

It makes me laugh when they verbally bitch slap each other, so there's some entertainment value at least.

The Christie-Rubio one over the last few days

One thing Christie is good for is his one liners.

 

[Bjerknes]

In all honesty she probably will, unfortunately. Get ready for President Hillary Clinton, everyone


I read this earlier and thought of you immediately
http://money.cnn.com/2016/02/08/news/economy/sanders-income-jobs/

"Friedman, who believes in democratic socialism like the candidate"

That should be the title of the article.

 

[AFL_ITALIA]

The Christie-Rubio one over the last few days

One thing Christie is good for is his one liners.

He's fucking up hard, it's beyond words.

 

[Ronn]

The debates are annoying with so many people.

Debates are annoying regardless, when 2 standing in the middle are Trump and Cruz

 

[icemaη]

O'Malley is still running?

 

[swag]

Sally O'Malley? She's 50.

 

[Ocelot]

O'Malley is still running?

Don't think so.

59.5% to 38% now babyyyyyy

Hope some of that momentum (@Seven) can influence South Carolina & the other southern states.

 

[j0ker]

Why do you guys hate Hillary so much?

 

[Hængebøffer]

Because she's a war mongering maniac.

 

[Maddy]

Why do you guys hate Hillary so much?

/Marstal on

Misogyny.

/Marstal off

 

[Hust]

Sally O'Malley? She's 50.

Mustang Sally?

 

[Ocelot]

Why do you guys hate Hillary so much?

She's not the worst, but she's the epitome of what most people mean when they talk about how bad career politicians are. Virtually completely in the hand of various lobbies & financial interest, very flexible when it comes to her political beliefs, dishonest.

A Hillary presidency wouldn't be catastrophic really, some (mostly social) issues like gay marriage, maybe some steps towards a more sensible drug policy would be handled pretty well. Overall however it would simply be more of the same instead of a change in the positive direction, and she's pretty hawkish when it comes to foreign policy as well.

Not that I wouldn't take her over any Republican candidate 11 times of 10.

 

[Hust]

She's not the worst, but she's the epitome of what most people mean when they talk about how bad career politicians are. Virtually completely in the hand of various lobbies & financial interest, very flexible when it comes to her political beliefs, dishonest.

A Hillary presidency wouldn't be catastrophic really, some (mostly social) issues like gay marriage, maybe some steps towards a more sensible drug policy would be handled pretty well. Overall however it would simply be more of the same instead of a change in the positive direction, and she's pretty hawkish when it comes to foreign policy as well.

Not that I wouldn't take her over any Republican candidate 11 times of 10.

Except for the last part

 

[icemaη]

Except for the last part

Who among the Republicans would you vote for now, since Paul is gone?