Part a) Push the limits? I haven't spoken to her directly in weeks (literally). She quoted me, bolded a portion about Tulsi Gabbard, and went on a rant about riots and bad cops which has nothing to do with my post. You don't see the issue there?
Part b) Do you see China as an issue heading into the next couple decades?
a) You're being testy and zesty like a blue-blooded Murican.
b) Yes. American identity is still largely white identity, which is really uncomfortable serving another cultural leader.
I see this even in silly things like AI. When people freak out about generalized AI rising up and enslaving humanity, it's always white dudes. Sure, more white dudes are doing AI research. But I am convinced now that this is because they fear what it means to not be at the top of the power heap. Women, brown people, etc. -- this is just called "life". They get on with it.
This fear is also behind a lot of Trumpsters too ... the silent worry of being tortured, abused, and at least discriminated against the very same ways that many whites have been guilty of for centuries. It's why the Trump cabinet is almost entirely white dudes in suits. That's really the unwritten racial resistance about America's inevitable demographic changes, whether it's because of police containment of blacks, visceral reactions to diversity efforts, to immigration paranoia.
The difference with China is that the US simply cannot bully them into a corner with cops and policies. The best they can do is ban Huawei.
China still has to contend with whether it grows old before it grows rich. But any young person in China sees America as a sick old Boomer who needs to step aside for a young generation that is smarter, faster, more educated, and growing ever more dominant in the world. America to them is a little like how Europe is when Americans snicker about it. They see America's downward trend as inevitable.
China's version of America's caste system Achilles-heel, however, is its Communist Party base. The economy is modern, but the politics are straight outta 1962. A big question is whether that could eventually be a strategic advantage or something harmful. There is a lot to argue that COVID is proving communitarianism as a societal advantage over individual atomism, as reflected in the impacts to China vs the US. I'm a believer that any system isn't nearly as good as the people implementing it -- that you can get a benevolent dictatorship that is far more effective and merciful than a democracy could be. It just depends on who is implementing it in their image.
Because if you are in the governance and politics game these days, the US is a Dumpster fire whereas China's totalitarian state at least seems to be responding better to the challenges of the world today ... i.e, responding at all, versus knifing itself in an alley and getting nothing done as the US is.
This split is going to play out in the next couple of decades. And seeing that the biggest problems in the world are more collectivist problems than individual ones, thus far I am leaning towards the communitarianism side winning out as an evolutionary strategy.
China is awful, how can we strike back?
introduce them to deep fried oreos? i doubt their digestive systems can handle it.
Cheese, man, lots and lots of cheese.
https://ltl-school.com/lactose-intolerance-in-china/
I'll drink to that.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7480358/