'Murica! (100 Viewers)

[ZoSo]

I don't use reddit. We all understand you spend all your time at R/The Donald, but don't project your own inadequacies upon others.

Every single article I post is easily available with a quick "Donald Trump" search in Google.

Please continue with your puerile nonsense though. You look more and more foolish with each passing day. At least Andy and Zach aren't actual Trump supporters. You should be ashamed. It's alright though, one day, you'll use "alternative facts" to claim you didn't support Trump like the vast majority of his deplorables.

I spend far less time browsing r/The Donald than you spend virtue signalling here

This 'shaming' tactic is pretty pathetic, trying to make someone feel bad because they don't support your views. I'm fine not circlejerking myself into hysteria for a President of a country I'm not even in And unlike you, I couldn't care less what some anonymous forum posters think of me so I don't plan on claiming I never supported Trump anytime soon (or ever)

- - - Updated - - -

If someone legitimately uses the word "libtard," they are unfortunately beyond help and cannot hold a discussion.

'Deplorables' is fine though

 

Buy on AliExpress.com

[AFL_ITALIA]

I spend far less time browsing r/The Donald than you spend virtue signalling here

This 'shaming' tactic is pretty pathetic, trying to make someone feel bad because they don't support your views. I'm fine not circlejerking myself into hysteria for a President of a country I'm not even in And unlike you, I couldn't care less what some anonymous forum posters think of me so I don't plan on claiming I never supported Trump anytime soon (or ever)

- - - Updated - - -



'Deplorables' is fine though

It's at least an actual word

 

[Enron]

I spend far less time browsing r/The Donald than you spend virtue signalling here

This 'shaming' tactic is pretty pathetic, trying to make someone feel bad because they don't support your views. I'm fine not circlejerking myself into hysteria for a President of a country I'm not even in And unlike you, I couldn't care less what some anonymous forum posters think of me so I don't plan on claiming I never supported Trump anytime soon (or ever)

- - - Updated - - -



'Deplorables' is fine though

To be fair. I don't think I can recall you ever explaining your viewpoint in anything other than memes or youtube videos with the occasional random article here and there.

So maybe participate more, troll less?

 

[IliveForJuve]

Zissy

 

[GordoDeCentral]

@GordoDeCentral @Osman @Seven

“As democracy is perfected, the office of president represents, more and more closely, the inner soul of the people. On some great and glorious day the plain folks of the land will reach their heart's desire at last and the White House will be adorned by a downright moron.”

No doubt, we deserve our leaders

 

[ALC]

Really? he was the commander in chief. And he was already in Afghanistan. Don't you think he ultimately was responsible?

Like AFL said above, that was decided by his cabinet. The President is a figurehead for the most part.

 

[Post Ironic]

Like AFL said above, that was decided by his cabinet. The President is a figurehead for the most part.

Although Trump would have you believe otherwise. Back in 2012 he bashed Obama for issuing executive orders. Called them "major power grabs of authority". Lo and behold, Trump is breaking records for a President, post WWII as far as number of executive orders issued.

 

[Ronn]

Like AFL said above, that was decided by his cabinet. The President is a figurehead for the most part.

No debating that his cabinet fucked up big time, but if you don't have what it takes to be independent-minded you should never run for president. The least damage you could do is to lower the bar.

 

[Enron]

"Miller, who was influential in drafting the ban, told CBS News’ John Dickerson that it was “crazy” for judges to rule on the constitutionality of laws".

 

[Seven]

"Miller, who was influential in drafting the ban, told CBS News’ John Dickerson that it was “crazy” for judges to rule on the constitutionality of laws".

The worst part is that a lot of people don't even realise how insanely dangerous such ideas are. Trump trying to destabilise the judiciary is the first step towards dictatorship.

But according to Andy this is trivial. And I guess it is. As a camp guard you have more pressing concerns.

 

[Post Ironic]

http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/fe...nada-escape-donald-trump-170212074112604.html
@Fr3sh

This is why a Trump presidency, although funny at times, is mostly just fuk'n tragic.

 

[lgorTudor]

American media should try to unite ppl, not divide them. Like the Danes

 

[Enron]

Our media should be more like Hitler was with the Germans. United.

Naw nigga, people should just do better.

 

[king Ale]

Such uncanny parallels

An American citizen who loses a job to a low-skilled immigrant has a lot to think about/work on before blaming immigrants.

there are far more important concerns to address, which Trump should realize as well.

Yup! Ivanka's line.

 

[Enron]

A draft dodging chicken hawk.

 

[king Ale]

Bush wasn't bad. The war wasn't really on his shoulders, the government would've gone to the Middle East anyways.

Sure, he had moments that made him seem ridiculous but overall, he was solid.

Only in the US can you invade a country, kill innocents and destroy lives, and still be praised and considered "solid". In other parts of the world you are labeled terrorists, dictators, war criminals, "killers".

Even the orange in chief who was supposedly against that war was only upset because the "dummies left Iraq (and Libya) without the oil". The biggest thugs and bullies of the modern day.

- - - Updated - - -

haven't seen you like this before

That's not me come on

 

[Enron]

Bush was pretty bad.

 

[Quetzalcoatl]

 

[Ronn]

He's referring to Tanker War http://www.historyofwar.org/articles/wars_tanker.html
And it's funny that he's not debating that US has to protect Saudi Arabia, but they have to pay for the service.

 

[Quetzalcoatl]

He's referring to Tanker War http://www.historyofwar.org/articles/wars_tanker.html
And it's funny that he's not debating that US has to protect Saudi Arabia, but they have to pay for the service.

I just find it interesting that he had the same message he has now, so long ago.