Just think of those fish in the Pacific who are suffering from the lack of water.
Buy on AliExpress.com
'Murica! (157 Viewers)
- Thread starter Fake Melo
- Start date
- Tags afl_italia's cousins forza trump smocking gun
Buy on AliExpress.com
Trump most racist evil person in the wor......wait hold uphttps://www.businessinsider.com/bid...would-create-a-racial-jungle-2019-7?r=DE&IR=T
Trump most racist evil person in the wor......wait hold uphttps://www.businessinsider.com/bid...would-create-a-racial-jungle-2019-7?r=DE&IR=T
Don't you agree with that though?
I'm 'racist' in the way that I don't mind pointing out that blacks are the most criminal race in America
Conclusively there is a higher percentage of garbage people among the blacks but the good ones are just as good as the whites/olives. (after the filtering of shit is done)
Is the media biased against Trump? It definitely is. Are the Democrats corrupt? They definitely are.
That’s no reason to support Cheetolini. The guy lies at a record breaking pace. You cannot trust anything that comes out of this administration. Besides, he is clearly not mentally stable to be a finger away from the nuclear launch codes.
That’s no reason to support Cheetolini. The guy lies at a record breaking pace. You cannot trust anything that comes out of this administration. Besides, he is clearly not mentally stable to be a finger away from the nuclear launch codes.
That's a fair criticism in general, but that's not the same thing.
The same people lamenting that she's a radical leftist are also pointing out that she's a hawkish prosecutor for people of color. That to me suggests just desperation. A starving kid sitting in a sandbox in a soiled diaper who is grabbing anything it can and throwing it, hoping something sticks. It reflects a complete lack of thinking.
Or a party of single 36 year-old women, as eloquently stated above.
I wish we had a resource for facts and objectivity, but unless we're going to collect taxes to run it like the BBC that clearly isn't happening.
Because as you know, that's not what the role of the media is today. Most people are delusional or completely ignorant of the media as a business.
Long gone are the days in the 1960s where the FCC granted licenses to broadcast only if they provided a minimum level of public service. Media is a business, and it must live or die on profit and loss. The media is not in the business of objectivity. Nobody gets financial rewards for being objective.
The media makes money to grab attention and sell that to advertisers. Period. This is America. This is what every God given right people have to do to make money. That's what "freedom" really means in America anyway ... the freedom to make money any way you want, as long as it is quasi-legal. So by that definition, the media is one of the most American industries there is.
Thus we can't hold it to some fact and objectivity standards. There ain't no money in that. That's the fast lane to going broke and failing as a business.
Good on her for stepping up to get hers for her eventual nursing home care there.
Absolutely true. What's really hypocritical is all these media sites that have sprung up hating on the media, because they disagree with some outlet's point and then dismiss the whole media business as a result ... even if by their very existence they too are the media they supposedly detest.
This is the business equivalent of the bathroom stall toe-tapping congressman who is always pushing anti-gay bills.
But their job is to help their media companies make money. As is the job really of most anybody employed for a for-profit business in happy capitalist America.
You got something against capitalism?
Or are you proposing tax hikes to support a media business with a bureaucratic regulatory agency to measure objectivity and fact-checking? If not, just how do you propose this facts-only entity somehow gets funded and operates?
Well put. Congress is like Sugar Daddy nation.
Yup. Every time there's a government handout, it is mostly not going to you but to some profiteering capitalist looking for leverage a la Russian oligarchs.
I guess dwarf tossing is out of the question though.
All credit to Trump for staying out of unnecessary wars. That said, let's also be realistic and remember that Bin Laden's 9/11 aim was pretty much to achieve what Trump has been trying to do too.
Speaking of which, since 2016 was the "Flight 93 Election", can we officially conclude that the plane has indeed crashed already in a Pennsylvania field yet?
The same people lamenting that she's a radical leftist are also pointing out that she's a hawkish prosecutor for people of color. That to me suggests just desperation. A starving kid sitting in a sandbox in a soiled diaper who is grabbing anything it can and throwing it, hoping something sticks. It reflects a complete lack of thinking.
Or a party of single 36 year-old women, as eloquently stated above.
I wish we had a resource for facts and objectivity, but unless we're going to collect taxes to run it like the BBC that clearly isn't happening.
Because as you know, that's not what the role of the media is today. Most people are delusional or completely ignorant of the media as a business.
Long gone are the days in the 1960s where the FCC granted licenses to broadcast only if they provided a minimum level of public service. Media is a business, and it must live or die on profit and loss. The media is not in the business of objectivity. Nobody gets financial rewards for being objective.
The media makes money to grab attention and sell that to advertisers. Period. This is America. This is what every God given right people have to do to make money. That's what "freedom" really means in America anyway ... the freedom to make money any way you want, as long as it is quasi-legal. So by that definition, the media is one of the most American industries there is.
Thus we can't hold it to some fact and objectivity standards. There ain't no money in that. That's the fast lane to going broke and failing as a business.
Good on her for stepping up to get hers for her eventual nursing home care there.
Absolutely true. What's really hypocritical is all these media sites that have sprung up hating on the media, because they disagree with some outlet's point and then dismiss the whole media business as a result ... even if by their very existence they too are the media they supposedly detest.
This is the business equivalent of the bathroom stall toe-tapping congressman who is always pushing anti-gay bills.But their job is to help their media companies make money. As is the job really of most anybody employed for a for-profit business in happy capitalist America.
You got something against capitalism?
Or are you proposing tax hikes to support a media business with a bureaucratic regulatory agency to measure objectivity and fact-checking? If not, just how do you propose this facts-only entity somehow gets funded and operates?
Well put. Congress is like Sugar Daddy nation.
Yup. Every time there's a government handout, it is mostly not going to you but to some profiteering capitalist looking for leverage a la Russian oligarchs.
I guess dwarf tossing is out of the question though.All credit to Trump for staying out of unnecessary wars. That said, let's also be realistic and remember that Bin Laden's 9/11 aim was pretty much to achieve what Trump has been trying to do too.
Speaking of which, since 2016 was the "Flight 93 Election", can we officially conclude that the plane has indeed crashed already in a Pennsylvania field yet?
Last edited:
I disagree with the bias thing on Trump. As soon as it was clear Trump was going to get the nomination, they began slandering him as a racist and then shortly after started with the Russia hoax nonsense. That laid the framework for the narrative that was repeated by MSM. Then Trump went pretty hard back at them.
- - - Updated - - -
It could be literally anyone receiving the handout, not just business. You also have government contractors everywhere. There's no way to defend against rent-seeking other than to keep government out of the marketplace period.
So you're saying Bin Laden wanted to Make America Great Again, too?
- - - Updated - - -
It could be literally anyone receiving the handout, not just business. You also have government contractors everywhere. There's no way to defend against rent-seeking other than to keep government out of the marketplace period.
So you're saying Bin Laden wanted to Make America Great Again, too?
Last edited: