Mozilla Firefox or Opera, choose your browser. (21 Viewers)

I use...

  • I'm awesome like icεmαή, Sheik and V so I use Opera

  • I'm a geek like Martin and JCK so I use Mozilla Firefox

  • I like following trends, so I use Chrome

  • I suck. So I use IE.


Results are only viewable after voting.

Emma

Senior Member
Mar 4, 2004
3,753
++ [ originally posted by Martin ] ++
Quite remarkable! According to this study, Mozilla now has 7%+ of the market, while IE is below 90%.. :party:

http://www.onestat.com/html/aboutus_pressbox34.html

===

Mozilla's browsers global usage share is 7.35 percent according to OneStat.com



Amsterdam - November 22 2004 - OneStat.com ( www.onestat.com ), the number one provider of real-time web analytics, today reported that Mozilla's browsers have a total global usage share of 7.35 percent. The new Mozilla's Firefox has a total usage share of 4.58. The total usage share of Mozilla was 2.1 percent at the end of May. Microsoft's Internet Explorer still dominates the global browser market with a global usage share of 88,90 percent which is 5 percent less as at the end of May.



"It seems that people are switching from Microsoft's Internet Explorer to Mozilla's new Firefox browser. The total usage share of Microsoft declined 5 percent and the total usage share of Mozilla increased 5 percent," said Niels Brinkman, co-founder of OneStat.com.



Microsoft's IE 6 is currently the leading browser on the web. Microsoft's IE 6 global usage has increased with 11.65 percent from 69.3 percent to 80.95 percent since May 2004.



Opera's global usage share is 1.33 percent and Safari has a global usage of 0.91 percent.



The most popular browsers on the web are:




1. Microsoft IE 6.0 80.95%
2. Microsoft IE 5.0 4.18%
3. Microsoft IE 5.5 3.66%
4. Mozilla Firefox 0.1 2.79%
5. Mozilla 1.x 2.77%
6. Mozilla Firefox 1.0 1.79%
7. Opera 7.x 1.29%



OneStat.com is the number one provider of real-time web site analytics in the world. Our superior technology powers more than 50,000 websites in 100 countries. With our accurate, detailed & reliable reports we will be able to answer questions about visitor behaviour, site performance and retention.



The OneStat.com solutions provide executives, marketers and webmasters with answers to critical e-business questions such as:



· Who is visiting my website?

· How many pageviews, visits (sessions) and visitors are coming on a daily, weekly, monthly, quarterly or yearly basis?

· What content, products, and services do my visitors prefer?

· How many visitors return to the website and how often?

· What kind of search engine do they use?

· What kind of technology do your visitors use to view the website?

· What is the return on investment of my advertising campaigns?

· How do I identify significant trends?

· How much time do they spent on the website?



Methodology: A global usage share of xx percent for browser Y means that xx percent of the visitors of Internet users arrived at sites that are using one of OneStat.com's services by using browser Y. All numbers mentioned in the research are averages of last week and all measurements are normalised to the GMT timezone. Research is based on a sample of 2 million visitors divided into 20,000 visitors of 100 countries each day.
Much of the people using it are surely only using it because of the additional features. They probably couldnt give a damn about open source etc. IE6 is alot behind but I expect the new IE to be alot better, with all mozillas features. People will soon start to move back, if IE worked well and had mozillas features I'd move back.

With mozilla its annoying how it still dosent work on certain sites, like banking sites, ecommerce sites etc. Whats the point using a browser that cant handle the most important part of the internet?

Bring on IE7 I say. :D

And i love the new MSN search. The image search is fantastic.
 

Emma

Senior Member
Mar 4, 2004
3,753
++ [ originally posted by Majed ] ++
Yeah Martin, do you think the next IE would catch up or surpass Mozilla?

What do you know about it?
Tabbed browsing
Built in msn search feature
Actually works with secure sites
Skinable
Some Nice Skins unlike Firefox :D
 

Majed

Senior Member
Jul 17, 2002
9,630
++ [ originally posted by Emma ] ++


Tabbed browsing
Built in msn search feature
Actually works with secure sites
Skinable
Some Nice Skins unlike Firefox :D
Mozilla:

has tabbed browsing (old stuff)
Works only with sites that follow standard set desgin rules.
Skinable
'Nice' is in the eye of the beholder :p (that definition is close enough to "beautiful" )
 
OP
Martin

Martin

Senior Member
Dec 31, 2000
56,913
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread Starter #428
    ++ [ originally posted by Majed ] ++
    Yeah Martin, do you think the next IE would catch up or surpass Mozilla?

    What do you know about it?
    From what I've heard about it, it doesn't sound like it. Of course we won't know until it comes out.

    ++ [ originally posted by Emma ] ++
    Actually works with secure sites
    Meaning? Even lynx implements ssl fully. The only reason certain websites don't work as they should in gecko is that the web designers who built them are/were braindead.
     

    Emma

    Senior Member
    Mar 4, 2004
    3,753
    ++ [ originally posted by Martin ] ++


    From what I've heard about it, it doesn't sound like it. Of course we won't know until it comes out.



    Meaning? Even lynx implements ssl fully. The only reason certain websites don't work as they should in gecko is that the web designers who built them are/were braindead.
    No it seems to be sites that require a certain security.

    Sites like:
    www.national-lottery.co.uk - My lottery site :D
    www.halifax.co.uk - My banking site

    Im pretty sure the people who designed these sites are pros :D

    Firefox also has problems when sending a file with an attachment in gmail.

    Even this forum has a problem :D. The new private message open in a new window popup dosent work.

    I dont mean to bash it, but if it dosent work I cant smile say its a fantastic product.
     
    OP
    Martin

    Martin

    Senior Member
    Dec 31, 2000
    56,913
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread Starter #431
    What's wrong with those sites vis-a-vis Firefox?

    The PM thing could be just blocked by the popup blocker.. turn that off and try again.
     

    Emma

    Senior Member
    Mar 4, 2004
    3,753
    ++ [ originally posted by Martin ] ++
    What's wrong with those sites vis-a-vis Firefox?

    The PM thing could be just blocked by the popup blocker.. turn that off and try again.
    National Lottery site just dosent work at all. Invalid browser or something. I guess it just hasnt been designed for firefox.

    Halifax and GMAIL both try to work, takes forever before finally timing out.

    Sucks to have to keep switching back to IE to use certain sites. Many people must have this problem.

    PM thing your probably right. Its not worth losing popup blocking ;)

    All im saying though is people will use what works best for them, so if Firefox dont fix these things then people like me arent gonna hang around when a new IE has the same features. Which it will, they would be extremely dumb not to add them.
     

    mikhail

    Senior Member
    Jan 24, 2003
    9,576
    ++ [ originally posted by Emma ] ++
    PM thing your probably right. Its not worth losing popup blocking ;)
    You can turn that off for specific sites. When it blocks the window, double click on the icon it displays on the taskbar. Allow site. Or is that specific to Mozilla?
     
    OP
    Martin

    Martin

    Senior Member
    Dec 31, 2000
    56,913
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread Starter #434
    Incompatible Web Browser
    To allow us to give you secure access to this section of The National Lottery website you must use a PC or Mac running one of the following web browsers:

    * Internet Explorer 5.01 SP2, 5.2, 5.5 SP2 and 6.
    * Netscape 7 or AOL 7 and above

    You can download the latest version of Internet Explorer from Microsoft here .
    :howler::dielaugh:

    Nothing says incompetence louder than this message. Netscape 7 is derived from the same codebase as Firefox and also uses Gecko, thus the browser engine is exactly the same. And just because web designers who are "pros" produce websites that work in IE doesn't mean they aren't braindead or at least lazy to validate their code.

    I don't know about your bank or gmail but Firefox seems to work very well for most people who use it, otherwise it wouldn't be systematically capturing market shares, after all IE is preinstalled so why install Firefox if it doesn't work?

    Having said that, I think anyone should use what works best for them. A lot of companies are switching because of the many severe vulnerabilities in IE, that always was and still is a huge problem. Testiment to that is all the spyware you have running after using IE for a while..
     

    Emma

    Senior Member
    Mar 4, 2004
    3,753
    ++ [ originally posted by Martin ] ++


    :howler::dielaugh:

    Nothing says incompetence louder than this message. Netscape 7 is derived from the same codebase as Firefox and also uses Gecko, thus the browser engine is exactly the same. And just because web designers who are "pros" produce websites that work in IE doesn't mean they aren't braindead or at least lazy to validate their code.

    I don't know about your bank or gmail but Firefox seems to work very well for most people who use it, otherwise it wouldn't be systematically capturing market shares, after all IE is preinstalled so why install Firefox if it doesn't work?

    Having said that, I think anyone should use what works best for them. A lot of companies are switching because of the many severe vulnerabilities in IE, that always was and still is a huge problem. Testiment to that is all the spyware you have running after using IE for a while..
    I dont mean it dosent work at all. Yeah I like it as much as you, I jsut want it to work with everything. Is that to much to ask? :D
     

    Emma

    Senior Member
    Mar 4, 2004
    3,753
    ++ [ originally posted by Martin ] ++
    Graham is quite the missionary.. :D
    Sure he works hard but how many people has he really converted?

    myself approximately 20 people. I install it on anyones computer ive used. I also recommended it to lots of my classmates. :D
     
    OP
    Martin

    Martin

    Senior Member
    Dec 31, 2000
    56,913
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread Starter #437
    But it doesn't work with everything and the reason is that there is a portion of IE-specific code out there. If 95% of all cars were Fords and Ford decided to invent a new road standard where the road was skewed instead of straight just to screw all the other auto makers, those building roads would have the choice between using Fords' standard, which they would know 95% of all cars could drive on, and using the internationally accepted standard. But since Ford's cars were so f. up, this would take a bit more work for them because they would have to build the roads so that normal cars could drive on them, as well as do certain things specifically for Fords. Competitors would then have a choice between build their cars to Ford's f. up standard, with all the bugs that implies. Or to build them to the actual standard.

    Incompatibilities then are inevitable and it's not because Firefox is badly constructed, it's because certain websites just don't follow standards.
     

    Emma

    Senior Member
    Mar 4, 2004
    3,753
    ++ [ originally posted by Martin ] ++
    But it doesn't work with everything and the reason is that there is a portion of IE-specific code out there. If 95% of all cars were Fords and Ford decided to invent a new road standard where the road was skewed instead of straight just to screw all the other auto makers, those building roads would have the choice between using Fords' standard, which they would know 95% of all cars could drive on, and using the internationally accepted standard. But since Ford's cars were so f. up, this would take a bit more work for them because they would have to build the roads so that normal cars could drive on them, as well as do certain things specifically for Fords. Competitors would then have a choice between build their cars to Ford's f. up standard, with all the bugs that implies. Or to build them to the actual standard.

    Incompatibilities then are inevitable and it's not because Firefox is badly constructed, it's because certain websites just don't follow standards.
    good point.

    So you think websites will start to follow the standards? Or are we screwed forever?
     
    OP
    Martin

    Martin

    Senior Member
    Dec 31, 2000
    56,913
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread Starter #439
    ++ [ originally posted by Emma ] ++


    good point.

    So you think websites will start to follow the standards? Or are we screwed forever?
    I think with all the noise Firefox is making now, people everywhere are starting to take notice. I don't think there are that many websites being created today that are so IE specific that they refuse to work in Firefox. But of course many of the people who make them have had some kind of training, where they may have been taught to code a certain way.

    In some cases, like online banking, the customers have made so much noise that the sites decided to do something about it.
     

    Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 21)