Okay, I have to say this cause you people are relentless. Now, I realize that Bond started in the 60s and we didn't have a long history of film making back then. But at least now, in 2008, we know something, we've learned something.
A movie based on a book is not made for the people who love the book. There, I said it. I think we've seen time and time again that a movie that tries to stay true to the story in a novel ends up being deeply flawed in all sorts of ways. It's like trying to flush your cat down the toilet, it's possible (I assume) but noone would admire you for it. The movie is made for a different audience, a new one, a larger one. It gives people who never heard about the book a chance to enjoy the story, not the exact same story, but a similar story.
So Broccoli didn't make Bond like Ian Flemming wrote. Why would I care? I saw the movies, I liked them, especially as a teenager, that's really all I need to know. I haven't read the books and I have no plans to read them. The movies themselves make a perfectly good foundations to base opinions about Bond on