Is it really necessary to belittle other people's opinions? Gets a bit tiring after a while.
That's how he operates. Other people are wrong, he is right. He doesn't acknowledge what other people say, I wonder if he even reads it, he simply disregards and makes his reply from scratch.
But hey, he's a spoilt brat.
The fact he was a real asset for us 2 years ago says a lot V. That was 2 years ago. What about all of last year and even this year where he is almost as invisible as Trezeguet. He prevented a lot sure, I am not arguing that but he also hindered us by giving silly balls away and resulting in endless counterattacks and lost possession, the VERY thing you said he was so good at preventing.
Hey, I don't think I've ever defended Sissoko till now. He was horrid last year, no doubt about it. But he's a one-dimensional player, just like Trezeguet for example. Is it Trezeguet's fault he doesn't recieve a useful ball? No. Just like you can't expect to recieve a useful ball from Sissoko. He needs good passers around him. And having a Felipe Melo instead of a Cristiano Zanetti beside you makes for a world of difference. Not to mention a Pavel Nedved and Camoranesi on the wings to complete a 4-4-2 midfield, as opposed to Marchisio and Diego in a 4-3-1-2.
Oooh, "people me like me", tough guy? OK tough guy.
All this shit based on ONE comment. That's all you got? The one time that a couple people claimed Amauri did well to fight off a couple defenders in the match against Bari?
You just don't "get it", but you never do. "People like me", if that's how you want to refer to us, would not be against objective criticism towards the player. As a matter of fact, I've said several times that we should sell Amauri because he isn't good enough, bringing in another poacher. But on the other hand, you have clowns claiming that Amauri doesn't even try, or he's our worst player no matter what no matter the outcome of the game, which always tends to happen in Amauri's thread. It NEVER happens in Sissoko's thread, probably because those who critique him aren't so shortsighted to blame him solely for everything that plagues this team. Amauri gets it from all angles on a daily basis.
That's the difference.
And another thing you don't understand, strangely, is that Sissoko is partly the reason why we don't create many chances for our strikers. It seems rather idiotic to blame the strikers for not scoring when the midfield can't even conjure up a few chances for them, but hey, some might not really understand how this game works.
It gives me great joy to see every post of mine, aimed at exposing your hypocrisy, hit the nail on the head. I don't see how you figured I was a tough guy from that post, but OK, if it works for you.
And people like you? What's wrong with that? Did I say retards like you? Did you expect me to start naming names? Sorry, this way was easier. Don't be such a girl.
There you go proving my point I said to Buck. Completely disregarding the gist of the post, you focus on one bit and start labeling things shit and crap.
And objective and criticism coming from you? Are you freaking kidding me? Do you read the things you post? You instult, belittle and talk shit 99% of the time in your posts. Sorry but that's not constructive criticism. Read the exchange me and Hustini are doing, that's called constructive criticism.
If you truly said,
"I've said several times that we should sell Amauri because he isn't good enough, bringing in another poacher."; my hats off to you. We can put that on the empty sheet reserved for sensible posts you wrote. I'd appreciate a quote, though. I don't think I've ever said Amauri doesn't try, my beef with him is he doesn't score. Not near enough. But enough of him.
As for the last part, read my reply to Hustini. And I would be the last of all people to criticize strikers who don't score because of a lack of service...I mean really.
And if you blame Sissoko for us not creating chances, than you should really wonder which one of us knows how the game works.
Buy on AliExpress.com
