Wow, i don't think we have a member who's smart enough to have all this info.
Or do we?
Or do we?
Buy on AliExpress.com
Mock a forum member (17 Viewers)
- Thread starter Zé Tahir
- Start date
Buy on AliExpress.com
Pango Bieskiatsky is a good player
- I disagree.
He scored some neat goals, yes but he is an AM that drifts around the best, so defensive covering isnt his forte. He is not very creative although he can play left wing, AMC and forward, so not restricted to the right. He is prolly another bad player, meaning all about the flair and tricky dribbling, but without any end product.
What you're saying is utterly bizarre.
Pango Bieskiatsky is NOT a good player
- I disagree.
He scored some neat goals and he is an AM that drifts around the best. Defensive covering is also his forte. He is very creative and he can play left wing, AMC and forward, so not restricted to the right. He is prolly another great player, with flair and tricky dribbling, and great end product.
What you said is utterly bizarre.
Pango Bieskiatsky is a good player and not a good player
- I disagree.
He's a bad player and not a bad player.
He scored some neat goals and he is an AM that drifts around the best, so defensive covering isnt his forte. He is very creative and he can play left wing, AMC and forward, so not restricted to the right. He is prolly another bad player, meaning all about the flair and tricky dribbling, but without any end product.
What you said is utterly bizarre.
- I disagree.
He scored some neat goals, yes but he is an AM that drifts around the best, so defensive covering isnt his forte. He is not very creative although he can play left wing, AMC and forward, so not restricted to the right. He is prolly another bad player, meaning all about the flair and tricky dribbling, but without any end product.
What you're saying is utterly bizarre.
Pango Bieskiatsky is NOT a good player
- I disagree.
He scored some neat goals and he is an AM that drifts around the best. Defensive covering is also his forte. He is very creative and he can play left wing, AMC and forward, so not restricted to the right. He is prolly another great player, with flair and tricky dribbling, and great end product.
What you said is utterly bizarre.
Pango Bieskiatsky is a good player and not a good player
- I disagree.
He's a bad player and not a bad player.
He scored some neat goals and he is an AM that drifts around the best, so defensive covering isnt his forte. He is very creative and he can play left wing, AMC and forward, so not restricted to the right. He is prolly another bad player, meaning all about the flair and tricky dribbling, but without any end product.
What you said is utterly bizarre.
BURKE.
If not, then some American. Enron or someone. I give up anyway.
"In 1234, priests in a church in Saint etienne thought about making passionate gay love to each other. Now these thoughts were believed to have occured at 12:34 p.m on a Tuesday. Because of this unholy coincidence, all gay people were burned in Saint Ettiene."
If not, then some American. Enron or someone. I give up anyway.
"In 1234, priests in a church in Saint etienne thought about making passionate gay love to each other. Now these thoughts were believed to have occured at 12:34 p.m on a Tuesday. Because of this unholy coincidence, all gay people were burned in Saint Ettiene."
