Mirko Vučinić - Forward - AS Roma (15 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Suns

Release clause?
May 22, 2009
22,086
The problem is though, if we get him as a non-champion and put him on the left flank in a 4-3-3 that would be awesome. But getting him and putting him on the left in a 4-4-2(Yeah, its 4-4-2, not 4-2-4) would not be as good.

All I know is that we could need quality players besides Rossi(or Aguero).
 

Alen

Ѕenior Аdmin
Apr 2, 2007
53,924
The problem is though, if we get him as a non-champion and put him on the left flank in a 4-3-3 that would be awesome. But getting him and putting him on the left in a 4-4-2(Yeah, its 4-4-2, not 4-2-4) would not be as good.

All I know is that we could need quality players besides Rossi(or Aguero).
If we plan to play 4-3-3 then I can't see buying Vucinic and Rossi without selling Quagliarella.

Vucinic-Rossi-Krasic could be the staring trio, with Del Piero (where will he play in 4-3-3 though?), Matri and Pepe/Martinez as their subs. There is really no place for both Matri and Quag on the bench.

Or maybe buy Vucinic, not buy Rossi, keep Quag, play 4-3-3 and buy the champion for the midfield (the third man next to Pirlo and Vidal), but who would that guy be? We're not linked to any top midfielder and it's pretty clear from our actions that we're looking for the champion in attack.

I fear that it's a 4-4-2 we're gonna play and Conte is looking for Vucinic as a winger. That is why Vucinic doesn't exclude the champ in attack and that is why we're not seriously pushing for Bastos, Vargas or whoever that could play on the wing. I'd like to think it would be a genius move by Conte, but everything tells me that it's gonna be a disastrous experiment.
 

Luca

Senior Member
Apr 22, 2007
12,749
Vucinic is incredibly inconsistent and a bit lazy tbh, if we are to play him at lw then our midfield is going to have no balance and Vidal will look awful. We need a hard worker like Bastos or Vargas to help Vidal out because let's face it, Pirlo won't really be doing it.
 

Suns

Release clause?
May 22, 2009
22,086
If we plan to play 4-3-3 then I can't see buying Vucinic and Rossi without selling Quagliarella.

Vucinic-Rossi-Krasic could be the staring trio, with Del Piero (where will he play in 4-3-3 though?), Matri and Pepe/Martinez as their subs. There is really no place for both Matri and Quag on the bench.

Or maybe buy Vucinic, not buy Rossi, keep Quag, play 4-3-3 and buy the champion for the midfield (the third man next to Pirlo and Vidal), but who would that guy be? We're not linked to any top midfielder and it's pretty clear from our actions that we're looking for the champion in attack.

I fear that it's a 4-4-2 we're gonna play and Conte is looking for Vucinic as a winger. That is why Vucinic doesn't exclude the champ in attack and that is why we're not seriously pushing for Bastos, Vargas or whoever that could play on the wing. I'd like to think it would be a genius move by Conte, but everything tells me that it's gonna be a disastrous experiment.
Quag would be excellent in a 4-3-3. He's so versatile and could play in all the 3 spots. He could replace Krasic, Rossi and Vucinic. Selling him would be stupid if we really go for a 4-3-3.

Krasic/Quag - Rossi/Matri - Vucinic/Pepe

Also you can throw in Capitano too.
 

Zacheryah

Senior Member
Aug 29, 2010
42,251
Quag would be excellent in a 4-3-3. He's so versatile and could play in all the 3 spots. He could replace Krasic, Rossi and Vucinic. Selling him would be stupid if we really go for a 4-3-3.

Krasic/Quag - Rossi/Matri - Vucinic/Pepe

Also you can throw in Capitano too.
Capitano wont play, wheelchairs are forbidden
 

Alen

Ѕenior Аdmin
Apr 2, 2007
53,924
Quag would be excellent in a 4-3-3. He's so versatile and could play in all the 3 spots. He could replace Krasic, Rossi and Vucinic. Selling him would be stupid if we really go for a 4-3-3.

Krasic/Quag - Rossi/Matri - Vucinic/Pepe

Also you can throw in Capitano too.
I know that it would be the best, but my point was that we are not gonna have 4 of Krasic, Quag, Matri, Rossi, Vucinic, Pepe and Del Piero on the bench all the time.

This is what we aim at for the future. To have top quality on the pitch and good quality on the bench for every position. But at this moment I don't think we're in position to handle such depth. Financially we can't and neither we could handle the egos and demands for more playing time when all we have is serie A.

This is why I see one of Quag/Matri leaving if we bring both Rossi and Vucinic.
 

Luca

Senior Member
Apr 22, 2007
12,749
Quag>Vucinic.
Vucinic is great when he's played upfront and he's on his game but on overall consistency it's Quag all day long. What do other people think?
 

Alen

Ѕenior Аdmin
Apr 2, 2007
53,924
Quag>Vucinic.
Vucinic is great when he's played upfront and he's on his game but on overall consistency it's Quag all day long. What do other people think?
I won't comment the Quag>Vucinic part. That's about preferences and since there isn't visible difference in qhat they offer overall, it's hard to argue anyone's preference.

As for the other part, I disagree. Not with the fact that Vucinic is inconsistent (because he really is) but with the part that Quag beats Mirko on overall consistency. Come on, Quag is actually Vucinic's biggest rival in "Who's serie A most inconsistent player?" :D

P.S: If they were both consistent, then they'd have been real beasts. They both play marvelous for 2-3 months and then drastically drop form for the next 2-3 months. If they could keep the good form throughout the season, they'd be amazing. But on the other hand, if they were consistent, they'd have already been in the best La Liga and EPL teams.
 

Maddy

Oracle of Copenhagen
Jul 10, 2009
16,545
The biggest diffenrence between Vucinic and Quagliarella is how they perform in the big matches. Vucinic is a game changer. Quagliarella never will be.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 13)