Michele Pazienza (10 Viewers)

[Fake Melo]

Thanks. I hope that's not in order.

Pazienza was not called up to the match against Atalanta. Marrone was.

IIRC Pazzi wasn't called up for the Lecce and Cagliari matches either, no?

 

Buy on AliExpress.com

[Salvatore]

IIRC Pazzi wasn't called up for the Lecce and Cagliari matches either, no?

He was called up for the Cagliari game. Juventus.com didn't publish a list of those called up for Lecce so I don't know about that game.

 

[Fake Melo]

He was called up for the Cagliari game. Juventus.com didn't publish a list of those called up for Lecce so I don't know about that game.

I see. Do you remember if he was on the bench against Cagliari?

 

[Salvatore]

Marrone was on the bench, not Pazienza.

 

[Fake Melo]

Marrone was on the bench, not Pazienza.

Thanks

 

[Ahmed]

no Pazienza for Atalanta...

 

[Hust]

Third time in a row that Marrone is selected above Pazienza. It's good news.

It's good news, indeed.

You know what the that means?

 

[Salvatore]

It's good news, indeed.

You know what the that means?

What?

 

[Albertmare]

Albert.

Use some sense here, son.

He wouldn't distract Marrone's development bro

 

[BIG DADDY!!!]

So our subs for CM are Marrone, Appelt and a new signing?

God forbid we suffer an injury crisis cos our MF is the reason we're currently doing so well.

 

[Hust]

So our subs for CM are Marrone, Appelt and a new signing?

God forbid we suffer an injury crisis cos our MF is the reason we're currently doing so well.

Marrone is fine to cover for anyone in the 3. Appelt is the new Pirlo and Radja the new Edgar davids.

 

[Hust]

What?

Means that we were right...again.

Never get's old, does it?

 

[Lion]

this isn't fm. just becuase a player is promising doesn't mean he will handle the pressure of 1st football easily. not everyone is messi or fabregas.

letting pazienza go is a mistake. he offers us depth and he is reliable player.

 

[YasoR17]

I agree Hust

 

[Mark]

Means that we were right...again.

Never get's old, does it?

Marrone's leaving too though.





















:nerd:

 

[Hust]

this isn't fm. just becuase a player is promising doesn't mean he will handle the pressure of 1st football easily. not everyone is messi or fabregas.

letting pazienza go is a mistake. he offers us depth and he is reliable player.

marrone can easily do anything pazienza can do. no point in keeping paz when we are looking to bring in a better CM than him anyways. Marrone doesn't cost us as much for salary anyways, so why not make a pretty good profit off of paz and/or save on wages for a better player?

simple mathematics here. marrone is our own player, costs us next to nothing...as good as paz. paz came for free...sell him for profit and use for a better CM to reinforce the team.

i don't see the problem.

 

[Hust]

Marrone's leaving too though.




















:nerd:

not funny.

 

[Fake Melo]

Means that we were right...again.

Never get's old, does it?

Right on what?

 

[Salvatore]

Means that we were right...again.

Never get's old, does it?

I'll hold out until February 1st. If Pazienza goes, we'll be left with 4 centre midfielders, it wouldn't make sense to send Marrone out as well.

 

[Lion]

you don't see the bigger picture, hus


we have 3 spots in midfield. most teams have 6 midfielders for those 3 positions. we currently have marrone and pazienza as back up which leaves another spot.

you see pazienza as an obstacle in marrone's development, whichis ridiculos because the same thing could be said for marchisio, vidal and pirlo.

we need depth. paziena is a solid player and would be very useful next season in cl.