Michael Ballack? (15 Viewers)

Holygr4le

Senior Member
Aug 4, 2005
2,539
Zlatan said:
We might not ned him, but fact is we could make very good use of him.
Yes we could. But consistancy is a good thing for a team and with a team with Emerson, Viera and Ballack we would´nt get that. Add cammo, neddy and Mutu fighting over the other posts.
 

Orgut

Senior Member
Dec 31, 2002
18,224
Well if it won`t work out we could try luring Adriano by offering them Ballack and Cassano which we will be gaining for free
 

Maher

Juventuz addict
Dec 16, 2002
13,521
I dont know where is the position that he play in , why are you comparing him with viera and emerson , he is not a defensive midfielder ??
 

Holygr4le

Senior Member
Aug 4, 2005
2,539
m_elayyan said:
I dont know where is the position that he play in , why are you comparing him with viera and emerson , he is not a defensive midfielder ??
So Viera and Emerson is? They do great in defense and I can agree on that Emersons defensive skills are better then his offensive ones, but still they are both playmakers in a way. With Viera in the team Emerson has taken one step back and plays a bit different from last year. If Ballack would enter the team we would have 3 simular players on the pitch. It would be a disaster. I can promise you that you´ll never see them on the pitch together.

We would loose speed, movement and creativity. The wings would suffer and attack as well. You need creativity in form of players as Cammo, Neddy or Mutu on those positions. Viera would not enjoy his game as he does today with Ballack fighting over the same space, the same balls and over the same position.

In other words: If we loose Emerson or Viera it would be great to have Ballack. If not he will never come. Juve would not even consider it.
 

Bjerknes

"Top Economist"
Mar 16, 2004
111,701
Yep, nobody has a clue about what sort of player Ballack is except for Burke and a couple others.

Emerson would be the holding midfielder for Juventus, Vieira and Ballack would roam forward more and support the attack. If we play with four in midfield Ballack would take a role next to Emerson or Vieira, whichever one Capello prefers. If Ballack is able to adapt, he could play on the left side of midfield as well.

So what does this mean? Ballack can play almost anywhere in midfield. Is that so hard to understand people?
 

Zlatan

Senior Member
Jun 9, 2003
23,049
RochemBeck said:
Yep, nobody has a clue about what sort of player Ballack is except for Burke and a couple others.

Emerson would be the holding midfielder for Juventus, Vieira and Ballack would roam forward more and support the attack. If we play with four in midfield Ballack would take a role next to Emerson or Vieira, whichever one Capello prefers. If Ballack is able to adapt, he could play on the left side of midfield as well.

So what does this mean? Ballack can play almost anywhere in midfield. Is that so hard to understand people?


IMO he wouldnt have to play left midfielder, he would just play in front of Emerson and Vieira, with Zambrotta covering the left by himself, and Zlatan helping him as he likes to drift out wide.
 

Bjerknes

"Top Economist"
Mar 16, 2004
111,701
Zlatan said:
IMO he wouldnt have to play left midfielder, he would just play in front of Emerson and Vieira, with Zambrotta covering the left by himself, and Zlatan helping him as he likes to drift out wide.
You really think Capello will use the 4-3-1-2? He barely even used that formation with Totti and Roma..
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 14)