Medhi Benatia - CB - Bayern Munich (19 Viewers)

[JBF]

Im very skeptical about this guy. On one hand there's the Udinese/Roma Benatia while on the other there's the Bavarian one. Yet for some reason I cant help but feel its a Barzagli kind of deal Dejavu.

Or maybe Its just wishful thinking.

 

Buy on AliExpress.com

[gg89]

He will do well in the more traditional Juve backline. His main issue was Pep's defensive line being stationed beyond the midfield center for tactical reasons, a role that didn't suit him (also his never ending injuries didn't help).

You will most likely also get him for a bargain price too because we're FC Charity München and always sell cheap >.> I heard the deal will be some kind of loan deal but there will be some kind of injury clause according to which if he gets injured and doesn't meet an specific target of availability for games, yo don't have to buy him. Sucks for us.

Sent from my XT1064 using Tapatalk

 

[Mohad]

This is the first time I noticed that his name is Medhi and not Mehdi But what the heck? :wth:

The right one is Mahdi (مَهد&#1610 but Medhi? Come on

 

[rakib567]

He will do well in the more traditional Juve backline. His main issue was Pep's defensive line being stationed beyond the midfield center for tactical reasons, a role that didn't suit him (also his never ending injuries didn't help).

You will most likely also get him for a bargain price too because we're FC Charity München and always sell cheap >.> I heard the deal will be some kind of loan deal but there will be some kind of injury clause according to which if he gets injured and doesn't meet an specific target of availability for games, yo don't have to buy him. Sucks for us.

Sent from my XT1064 using Tapatalk

bro, coman goetze swap. what do u think

 

[Juvellino]

Loan with obligation to buy if he meets a appearance/injury clause would be very reasonable IMO.

 

[Sjaban]

Loan with obligation to buy if he meets a appearance/injury clause would be very reasonable IMO.

This

 

[gg89]

Loan with obligation to buy if he meets a appearance/injury clause would be very reasonable IMO.

Very reasonable for you xD very unreasonable for us!

Sent from my XT1064 using Tapatalk

 

[Ronn]

He will do well in the more traditional Juve backline. His main issue was Pep's defensive line being stationed beyond the midfield center for tactical reasons, a role that didn't suit him (also his never ending injuries didn't help).

You will most likely also get him for a bargain price too because we're FC Charity München and always sell cheap >.> I heard the deal will be some kind of loan deal but there will be some kind of injury clause according to which if he gets injured and doesn't meet an specific target of availability for games, yo don't have to buy him. Sucks for us.

Sent from my XT1064 using Tapatalk

Lord Nostradamus does not approve

 

[Juvellino]

Very reasonable for you xD very unreasonable for us!

Sent from my XT1064 using Tapatalk

Hopefully the rumors are true :xfinger:

 

[Zacheryah]

Very reasonable for you xD very unreasonable for us!

Sent from my XT1064 using Tapatalk

Why ? Juventus is the only true top team aside bayern that will pay a top price for non scoring defenders. With his unlucky injury history, it will be hard for you to sell him.


Now that you have Hummels, you can scrap Benatia's wage for at least a season. If he stays injury free, he's sold, if he doesnt, juventus still will consider an offer.



Welcome to 2016. Where defence doesnt matter

 

[gg89]

Why ? Juventus is the only true top team aside bayern that will pay a top price for non scoring defenders. With his unlucky injury history, it will be hard for you to sell him.


Now that you have Hummels, you can scrap Benatia's wage for at least a season. If he stays injury free, he's sold, if he doesnt, juventus still will consider an offer.



Welcome to 2016. Where defence doesnt matter

Not complaining haha Hummels+Renato is like an early Christmas, don't mind about Benatia, Rode and Götze leaving. I would just like us to get a bit more money for the players we sell once in a while (the Mario Gomez transfer was the worst). Would also be happy if Benatia stayed as a backup CB, anyway, but his injuries have made him a nuisance tbh.

Wish we could sell to the EPL for 300% of the player's value once in a while

Sent from my XT1064 using Tapatalk

 

[Juvellino]

Not complaining haha Hummels+Renato is like an early Christmas, don't mind about Benatia, Rode and Götze leaving. I would just like us to get a bit more money for the players we sell once in a while (the Mario Gomez transfer was the worst). Would also be happy if Benatia stayed as a backup CB, anyway, but his injuries have made him a nuisance tbh.

Wish we could sell to the EPL for 300% of the player's value once in a while

Sent from my XT1064 using Tapatalk

I think Bayern sells players for less to clubs they have done business with. I remember people saying they sold Mario Gomez for less because of the Luca Toni transaction and I think the Benatia sale is because of the Vidal and Coman transactions.

 

[gg89]

I think Bayern sells players for less to clubs they have done business with. I remember people saying they sold Mario Gomez for less because of the Luca Toni transaction and I think the Benatia sale is because of the Vidal and Coman transactions.

I think it has more to do with a policy of letting players go wherever they want to go. Gomez, for example, could probably have fetched a pretty nice sum in England, but he wanted to go enjoy the sun at Fiorentina, so... we took whatever they wanted to give us. It's fine to let players get their preferred destinations and all I guess.

Sent from my XT1064 using Tapatalk

 

[Juvellino]

I think it has more to do with a policy of letting players go wherever they want to go. Gomez, for example, could probably have fetched a pretty nice sum in England, but he wanted to go enjoy the sun at Fiorentina, so... we took whatever they wanted to give us. It's fine to let players get their preferred destinations and all I guess.

Sent from my XT1064 using Tapatalk

I sort of like that Juve and Bayern seem to do that.

 

[king Ale]

The right one is Mahdi (مَهد&#1610 but Medhi? Come on

Is Mehdi also incorrect? Do Mehdi and Mahdi have different meanings in Arabic?

 

[Mohad]

Is Mehdi also incorrect? Do Mehdi and Mahdi have different meanings in Arabic?

Yeah, the pronunciation is different in Arabic, Mehdi means gifts provider while Mahdi means preacher or mentor.

 

[zizinho]

Yeah, the pronunciation is different in Arabic, Mehdi means gifts provider while Mahdi means preacher or mentor.

i always thought its the same name (with same letters and signs) but only that its read differently in different parts of the arabic world. for example, ive heard and read both Mohammad and Mohammed (or other examples like Ahmad and Ahmed, Abu Bakr and Ebu Bekr etc.). the ones with "e" are correct from what i know but some people still use "a"

 

[Hist]

Yeah, the pronunciation is different in Arabic, Mehdi means gifts provider while Mahdi means preacher or mentor.

Mehdi/mahdi means gift receiver not provider or the guided one. Hadi would be gift provider or guide.

I have no idea what is medhi

 

[viking1897]

Imam mahdi

 

[Mohad]

Mehdi/mahdi means gift receiver not provider or the guided one. Hadi would be gift provider or guide.

I have no idea what is medhi

You are an Arab right? You should know better.

http://www.almaany.com/ar/dict/ar-ar/مهدي/