Well, it's a pretty random metric to emphasize one trophy that only one manager can win per year but also say that people who win that trophy also might not be tier 1 thus telling us that:
> This metric is VITAL/ABSOLUTELY important to be a Tier 1 manager
but also
>Shit managers win it too
LMAO ok....................
Well, obviously a manager can fluke his way to a CL title (Di Matteo, Benitez, Riijkard, etc,,,) but none of them are Tier 1 managers. Again, assessing coaches is subjective.
It's not too far-fetched to suggest that Tier 1 coaches must have won at least one domestic title, one European crown and maintained a consistent/sustainable level of success over the past decade. Does that sound reasonable?
- - - Updated - - -
Nor does it mean a coach who has failed to beat significantly stronger teams in CL finals is less than Tier 1. Allegri was absolutely tier 1 during his previous tenure. Will he get back there? Maybe not.
You know the difference between Klopp and Allegri is that Klopp got to play Tottenham in his third CL final. Before that he was 0-3 in European finals. Allegri played two of the greatest CL teams of all time.
Again, Allegri is unfortunate. I would have definitely placed Allegri as Tier 1 had he won one CL title, but that simple fact and the 4-1 shellacking against Madrid makes it hard for me to do so - the biggest game of his career and he shit the bed. Also, the fact that he has been away from the game for 2+ years and is not exactly covering himself in glory this season counts against him.
Both Allegri and Moaninho can get back to Tier 1, and new coaches can be added. Again, this is my list. I don't expect everyone to agree with it. Heck, I don't even fucking care. I am just trying to rationalize and explain why I chose the coaches I did as Tier 1. Now, if Zidane doesn't coach for the next 2-3 years, he's definitely falling out.