I'll say it again, it is very very very unlikely that any other coach can get higher results with this group of players than Allegri. Even Conte couldnt match his results and he is a coach that at least initially makes players punch well above their weight and fills them with confidence and self-belief (until l he falls out with management over transfers that is). That is not to say that he doesnt make mistakes in specific games, I am just saying that overall he gets results and usually makes us punch above our weight. This is a limited group of players compared with the big clubs and sadly more rich clubs are emerging with better squads and so the gap will naturally grow.
I see two possible alternate strategies that we could employ to keep growing. This is the naive optimist in me:
1) We change coaches and hire a very attractive but competent coach (Jardim, Sarri, Pep type). We would then get slightly lesser results (we'd probably still win the league as we have the best squad by a mile and all serie A clubs are poor af) but would make big gains aesthetically.
The football would be so aesthetically pleasing that we'd dominate lesser teams with big scores and players like Dybala, Costa and Higuain will be super entertaining to follow and we'd make more money as a result and close the financial gap on the rich by becoming an attractive brand that neutrals follow. The fundamental assumption of this strategy is that we could make huge commercial gains if we play dominant attractive football all the way till we meet a Barca/Bayern/Madrid and get smashed in the CL. This could very well be false because Dybala, Costa and Higuain might not be capable of being attractive enough in an offensive setup. PSG could use this strategy because they could buy Neymar, Ibra etc from owners money and then wait for commercial revenues to pay them back but we dont have that money and will have to use the players we got and can afford.
2) More of the same but adopt a harsher stance on selling key players. Basically this means we keep Allegri or employ a similar coach like Simeone or Inzaghi who plays ugly but can get the team to punch above their weight most of the time. This means we commercially continue with the same brand of football we have been using but slow down the degradation of our squad by keeping the Vidals, Pogbas and Dybalas no matter what. The fundamental assumptions of this strategy are (A) that we can keep those players performing despite forcing them to stay which I believe is very plausible and (B) if we keep those players, then the gap with the rich (in footballing and not financial terms) would shrink and be small enough that facing them with our master tactician coach would be a 50/50 and that would be enough to win the CL.
These assumptions could be false especially B, given the existence of Messi and Ronaldo who having them is like having 2 extra players on the pitch and given their superior buying power in general. Maybe we wont always find steals like Vidal and Pirlo and Pogba.
In short, the gap with Madrid/Barca/Bayern is growing, and there looks to be more teams joining that ultra rich club at least on paper like PSG and City, while our relative buying power is decreasing and our squad quality is degrading. This is bad but we can survive this well if we either become an entertaining but still competent team and make big commercial revs or we can do more of the same but stop losing key players every season and hope our tactician coaches can get us to punch above our weight and win the CL (which will have a good impact on commercial revs as well).
The sad part is that both scenarios seem unlikely given what Marotta has been saying.
I see two possible alternate strategies that we could employ to keep growing. This is the naive optimist in me:
1) We change coaches and hire a very attractive but competent coach (Jardim, Sarri, Pep type). We would then get slightly lesser results (we'd probably still win the league as we have the best squad by a mile and all serie A clubs are poor af) but would make big gains aesthetically.
The football would be so aesthetically pleasing that we'd dominate lesser teams with big scores and players like Dybala, Costa and Higuain will be super entertaining to follow and we'd make more money as a result and close the financial gap on the rich by becoming an attractive brand that neutrals follow. The fundamental assumption of this strategy is that we could make huge commercial gains if we play dominant attractive football all the way till we meet a Barca/Bayern/Madrid and get smashed in the CL. This could very well be false because Dybala, Costa and Higuain might not be capable of being attractive enough in an offensive setup. PSG could use this strategy because they could buy Neymar, Ibra etc from owners money and then wait for commercial revenues to pay them back but we dont have that money and will have to use the players we got and can afford.
2) More of the same but adopt a harsher stance on selling key players. Basically this means we keep Allegri or employ a similar coach like Simeone or Inzaghi who plays ugly but can get the team to punch above their weight most of the time. This means we commercially continue with the same brand of football we have been using but slow down the degradation of our squad by keeping the Vidals, Pogbas and Dybalas no matter what. The fundamental assumptions of this strategy are (A) that we can keep those players performing despite forcing them to stay which I believe is very plausible and (B) if we keep those players, then the gap with the rich (in footballing and not financial terms) would shrink and be small enough that facing them with our master tactician coach would be a 50/50 and that would be enough to win the CL.
These assumptions could be false especially B, given the existence of Messi and Ronaldo who having them is like having 2 extra players on the pitch and given their superior buying power in general. Maybe we wont always find steals like Vidal and Pirlo and Pogba.
In short, the gap with Madrid/Barca/Bayern is growing, and there looks to be more teams joining that ultra rich club at least on paper like PSG and City, while our relative buying power is decreasing and our squad quality is degrading. This is bad but we can survive this well if we either become an entertaining but still competent team and make big commercial revs or we can do more of the same but stop losing key players every season and hope our tactician coaches can get us to punch above our weight and win the CL (which will have a good impact on commercial revs as well).
The sad part is that both scenarios seem unlikely given what Marotta has been saying.
if we play dominant attractive football all the way till we meet a Barca/Bayern/Madrid and get smashed in the CL.
I dont think we need neymars or mbappes for this to work... but a good organization and mentality for it. yesterday we saw how vulnerable they can be if you attack them with commitment. Sometimes more akind to 90s juve and 2012 bayern rather than to tiki takas spaniards
Winning with this style will breed only more confidence in our gameplay. Will make players have confidence in themselves when attacking and knowing how to pounce and and when. Maybe we will not eb as stellar in defence as the prime of BBC, but we all know a prime BBC is no whats needed to win in europe. I think we are all pretty clear that this has been debunked many times over.
