out now?


  • Total voters
    166
  • Poll closed .

Post Ironic

Senior Member
Feb 9, 2013
42,253
Probably because Zaza and Mandzukic will be so poor he doesn't have a choice, which is silly to begin with.
He pulled the same bullshit with Morata-Llorente last year. Luckily we had Tevez covering for the shitstorm that was Llorente's first half.

This year, we have no one who can carry our attack like that, and he doesn't even partner Morata properly. The match against Bologna, we played Dybala and Morata up front, and no surprise, Morata had a goal, an assist, and won a penalty which Dybala scored.

So what does Allegri do? Let's put Dybala on the bench and start fucking Zaza, because he wouldn't want Dybala-Morata to work on that super performance and further develop their partnership. And then, let's sub Morata off first, so Dybala doesn't even see the field with him.

Genius tactics.
 

baggio

Senior Member
Jun 3, 2003
19,250
But that's ridiculous if Allegri is really being that petulant about this. Dybala is top scorer, Alex Sandro was probably one of our 3 best players over the 2 matches he started... and Allegri seems to despise playing them.
Honestly he's a dumbass if he's being petulant about it but I just don't see that. Let's say we fault him for not playing Dybala, you'd still have as much a case for Evra as you would Sandro, which just means that the rest of the subs remain as are, which is still a lot of money riding the bench and the point still stands. In my view he wanted to set the team up slightly differently. That said, even if Dybala started, the real problem to me was in the midfield, more than the attack. We grew into the game but largely in the second half. A good account of ourselves, but this team is not decisive enough to win the Scudetto even with Dybala starting every game.

More fucking points dropped we just don't know how to win these games anymore
No Tevez. No Vidal. Those guys epitomised the grinta you need to win games like these. When you lack that you gotten have a far more fluid game and I think we were a bit off the pace today. Probably Lemina instead of Marchisio would've been the way to go.
 

Post Ironic

Senior Member
Feb 9, 2013
42,253
Honestly he's a dumbass if he's being petulant about it but I just don't see that. Let's say we fault him for not playing Dybala, you'd still have as much a case for Evra as you would Sandro, which just means that the rest of the subs remain as are, which is still a lot of money riding the bench and the point still stands. In my view he wanted to set the team up slightly differently. That said, even if Dybala started, the real problem to me was in the midfield, more than the attack. We grew into the game but largely in the second half. A good account of ourselves, but this team is not decisive enough to win the Scudetto even with Dybala starting every game.



No Tevez. No Vidal. Those guys epitomised the grinta you need to win games like these. When you lack that you gotten have a far more fluid game and I think we were a bit off the pace today. Probably Lemina instead of Marchisio would've been the way to go.
Was the midfield the problem in the first half? They gave Zaza several good chances to make something happen where he just uselessly fired over the bar or gave away the ball with appalling touch. I think the problem in the first half was leaving to much space between the mids and defense, and it allowed Inter to comfortably hold the ball whenever they gained possession.

Again though, we lacked end-product. Zaza and Cuadrado were wasteful to the extreme, and the formation basically marginalized Morata, because Zaza is not the type of forward that works with another forward playing centrally beside him.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 252)