Such an irrelevant argument. Real Madrid and Barcelona had two best players ever in their primes for 10 years in superstar stacked teams. And before that they had Ronaldinho, Rivaldo, Romario, Ronaldo, Raul, Zidane etc. That same Bayern lost 2/3 finals to inferior teams while being the attacking side. Ancelotti's Real was a strictly counter-attacking team. Real Galacticos had a dream team and didn't go further than 1/8 final 8 years in a row. Guardiola has all the money in the world and didn't sniff the CL since Barcelona. And even then they won the 2nd by committing daylight robbery vs Chelsea. Klopp is playing great offensive football and lost 2 finals. Lippi's Juventus won only 1 title out of 4 and they were favorites in every single one while attacking and playing offensive football.
My point isn't that this or that football is better or gets you what you want. It's that there are absolutely no guarantees and for every 'defending a 1 goal lead' team loss there are 10 more 'playing for a goal more' teams knocked out yet we only hear how bad defensive teams are.
So pointing out that the winners of the tournament are almost always offensively built is an irrelevant argument?
2018 winners Real: offensive gameplan
2017 winners Real: offensive gameplan
2016 winners Real: offensive gameplan
2015 winners Barca: offensive gameplan
2014 winners Real: offensive gameplan (Ancelottis sTrIcTlY cOuNtEr AtTaCkInG tEaM crushed teams like Gala and Schalke by 6 goals, Bayern by 4 btw)
2013 winners Bayern: offensive gameplan
2012 winners Chelsea: defensive gameplan
2011 winners Barca: offensive gameplan
2010 winners Inter: defensive gameplan
2009 winners Barca: offensive gameplan
2008 winners United: offensive gameplan
2007 winners Milan: offensive gameplan
2006 winners Barca: offensive gameplan
...