Because he is worth at least 10m and should have been sold in the summer. You can say he turned down moves but they seemed to be at the end of the window and he has clearly had a change of heart now. We should have been clear early on that he wasn't in the plans and sold him for funds.
Because he is worth at least 10m and should have been sold in the summer. You can say he turned down moves but they seemed to be at the end of the window and he has clearly had a change of heart now. We should have been clear early on that he wasn't in the plans and sold him for funds.
Which goes back to my first two posts, we are stupid to be in this situation and should have planned far better in the summer.
I'd think we'd still make more money holding him until January and selling then (when strikers are usually in demand and come at a premium) than saving 3 or 4 months salary by releasing now for nothing.
Which goes back to my first two posts, we are stupid to be in this situation and should have planned far better in the summer.
I'd think we'd still make more money holding him until January and selling then (when strikers are usually in demand and come at a premium) than saving 3 or 4 months salary by releasing now for nothing.
i disagree i think its better to offload now then keep paying wage in the hopes someone will cough up 10mil for a 33 y/o who hasnt played in six months
Yes they do. They absolutely do.Don't expect 15 million that Atlanta United paid for that 18 year old a couple of years ago, but Juve could get something for Mario.
and he shouldn't. in fact, marotta never released a player with a considerable book value. mandzukic's current value is around 5-5,5m, and i bet any potential buyer will have to pay that. otherwise we'll just let him sit out his contract.
and he shouldn't. in fact, marotta never released a player with a considerable book value. mandzukic's current value is around 5-5,5m, and i bet any potential buyer will have to pay that. otherwise we'll just let him sit out his contract.